fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
  

a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?

  
 
Wurjex
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #1 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


I recently started getting into photography, and it turns out it's really cool. I want to buy myself a professional camera once I earn some money. I want a camera with zero lag. Sony A9 III – what do you think, is it worth getting this camera for a beginner? It has a big plus that all the sensors read light simultaneously, but one minus – I won't be able to easily pull details out of the photos.



Aug 30, 2026 at 12:47 PM
aCuria
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #2 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


Wurjex wrote:
I recently started getting into photography, and it turns out it's really cool. I want to buy myself a professional camera once I earn some money. I want a camera with zero lag. Sony A9 III – what do you think, is it worth getting this camera for a beginner? It has a big plus that all the sensors read light simultaneously, but one minus – I won't be able to easily pull details out of the photos.


Well, if the majority of your subjects require above base ISO, zooms, or primes with the aperture wide open, there may not be much extra detail to excavate out of the lens.

However, if you shoot subjects where you can use base ISO, primes stopped down, tripods, and especially if you use pixel shift then yes you will see more detail from the high res sensors.

Its a pity the A9iii does not support pixel shift



Aug 31, 2026 at 02:21 AM
Wurjex
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #3 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


Yeah, that makes sense. Thanks for the insight and for the conversation!


Sep 03, 2026 at 03:59 PM
seaSharp
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #4 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


aCuria wrote:
Well, if the majority of your subjects require above base ISO, zooms, or primes with the aperture wide open, there may not be much extra detail to excavate out of the lens.

However, if you shoot subjects where you can use base ISO, primes stopped down, tripods, and especially if you use pixel shift then yes you will see more detail from the high res sensors.

Its a pity the A9iii does not support pixel shift


Given the speed of the sensor - is there any technical reason that it doesn't? Or did Sony just not get around to that?



Sep 03, 2026 at 05:01 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

aCuria
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #5 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


seaSharp wrote:
Given the speed of the sensor - is there any technical reason that it doesn't? Or did Sony just not get around to that?


I have no idea. Probably artificial product segmentation.



Sep 04, 2026 at 12:38 AM
j4nu
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #6 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


Because it has an optical low-pass filter, which removes the ultra-fine detail needed for pixel shift to produce results...


Sep 04, 2026 at 04:21 AM
Manu-K1
Online

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #7 · a9iii for $3500 is just wow... but why?


The A9 III has no competitor. It was released almost 3 years ago, and the other brands still don't have an answer to it. It was and still is revolutionary.

These days, I like shooting birds, and yes, the A9 III lacks some cropability power (but not as much as most people think), but many times I wish, especially for small birds, that I could do 120fps. I have the 30 fps A1, and even that is not fast enough in this scenario.

I'm still waiting for the price to drop, but at 3500 USD I may have chosen it instead of a used A1.




Sep 06, 2026 at 04:16 AM
1       2              end






FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account