fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman

  
 
patotts
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


As users and enthusiasts of Leica, it is hard to miss the brand's prominent featuring of Phil Penman as a thought-leader, teacher, and S-tier street photographer. While I have a great deal of respect for anyone reaching success at that level, I wonder why no one seems to factor in his background.

If I understand his trajectory correctly, Phil spent the first 15–20 years of his career as a paparazzi, aggressively chasing celebrities by bicycle and car, "hunting" celebs with long zoom-lenses. I know this industry is driven by societal supply and demand, but I still find it difficult to condone that line of work as a legitimate foundation for artistic humanism.

For the last 7–8 years, Phil has been recast as a Leica black-and-white storyteller and philosopher, heavily backed by Wetzlar’s marketing engine. I recently watched a Leica interview where he pontificated on the pseudo-spiritual service he provides to the public. A particularly stark moment was when he related a story about a stranger approaching him after being photographed to say, 'Thank you for noticing me.' Personally, I found that hard to believe.

While I don't want to derail this into a generic debate on the definition of street photography, it feels rich that someone with a long background as a commercial celebrity-hunter is now a leading corporate voice and educator on the ethics and soul of the street.

I don't know. It just doesn't sit right with me.

Thoughts? Comments?



Jul 12, 2026 at 01:32 PM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


In Italy "Thank You" is the most common response, other than no response, I get when people catch me taking their picture while I am street shooting. The Italians seem genuinely flattered that you would take their picture. Yes, there is the occasional person that objects but it is relatively rare here. The immigrant community being the ones who object the most often.


Jul 12, 2026 at 02:07 PM
retrofocus
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I guess this fits the line "Follow the money, and you always get your answer". Possible that he made the career change when selling celebrity photos to be published in paper journals weren't paying the bills anymore. Leica instead might pay some of their influencers well....


Jul 12, 2026 at 03:07 PM
Avntgardist
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I prefer to judge artists by their art and not their character.

So for me it's a deeply felt "meh".



Jul 12, 2026 at 03:37 PM
johnvanr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I like what I’ve seen of his street work, though it sometimes looks unreal to the point of having me wonder if it’s actually real.

About paparazzi work, I think it depends on the actual nature of that work. A lot of what we call paparazzi style is actually a celebrity’s agent getting the word out where that celebrity will be at a certain time, so that he/she can be “secretly” photographed. It’s just a play to stay in the limelight.

It’s sad that in our society you can make ton of money taking such meaningless images, but that’s a whole other story.



Jul 12, 2026 at 03:53 PM
RomanMF
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


Paparazzi are lame AF, and if that’s how he paid his bills in the early aughts, I don’t really gaf what he’s on about now tbh. Back when pap shots were the rage on tabloids mags, you could earn a proper living off of photography in many more honorable avenues than you can today.


Jul 13, 2026 at 12:30 AM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


patotts wrote:
As users and enthusiasts of Leica, it is hard to miss the brand's prominent featuring of Phil Penman as a thought-leader, teacher, and S-tier street photographer. While I have a great deal of respect for anyone reaching success at that level, I wonder why no one seems to factor in his background.

If I understand his trajectory correctly, Phil spent the first 15–20 years of his career as a paparazzi, aggressively chasing celebrities by bicycle and car, "hunting" celebs with long zoom-lenses. I know this industry is driven by societal supply and demand, but I still find it difficult to condone
...Show more →

Well, you asked for comments so here you go. I really don't get this compulsion some people seem to have to judge people. Penman is a professional photographer. I say let his work speak for itself. In Penman's case I find the work interesting, compelling and of a high quality.

He is a formally trained photographer from a respected UK College. He worked for the tradition press with prestigious organizations and publishers covering traditional news and events. He also worked for a celebrity press (I guess what you call paparazzi). All are legitimate photographic endeavors driven by market demand for the product. It seems that he has pivoted with the market and is now doing street photography content, publishing his work, teaching, holding workshops. Again all legitimate ways to make an honest living as a photographer.

So where is the beef? Judge his work, judge his books, judge his art, judge his teaching and speaking abilities. To negate those things based on some dislike for a particular genre of photography he participated in the past, or his association with industry companies that see value in his talent seem a bit petty and full of hubris to me. In the end his books, his prints, his workshops, his sponsorships, his speaking engagements grow from, and are all recognition of, respect for his work by a large enough audience to have value. Really, it is that simple.



Jul 13, 2026 at 01:55 AM
johnvanr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


1bwana1 wrote:
Well, you asked for comments so here you go. I really don't get this compulsion some people seem to have to judge people. Penman is a professional photographer. I say let his work speak for itself. In Penman's case I find the work interesting, compelling and of a high quality.

He is a formally trained photographer from a respected UK College. He worked for the tradition press with prestigious organizations and publishers covering traditional news and events. He also worked for a celebrity press (I guess what you call paparazzi). All are legitimate photographic endeavors driven by market demand for the
...Show more →

Overall, I agree with you, though I do think there would be some kind of behavior that would go too far for me to appreciate a person's work again in the future. If we stick with paparazzi, the people indirectly involved in Princess Diana's fatal accident in my mind went too far. The guys staking out a restaurant waiting for Taylor Swift to emerge, fine by me.

To me, it's more in music where these things come up, like when Cat Stevens turned muslim and joined the fatwa against Salman Rushdie (which he later retracted).

Edited on Jul 13, 2026 at 02:53 AM · View previous versions



Jul 13, 2026 at 02:42 AM
Ne314satel
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


patotts wrote:
Thoughts? Comments?


Who cares who he was? He could have been in prison, even a criminal, but we'll judge him by his photos. A paparazzi was always a better man than a politician.



Jul 13, 2026 at 02:52 AM
panos.v
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


Ne314satel wrote:
Who cares who he was? He could have been in prison, even a criminal, but we'll judge him by his photos. A paparazzi was always a better man than a politician.


Exactly that. So what, he was a pap. I didn't even know that. Should we look at the genealogical tree of everyone before we decide if they are worthy or not? Are we in the British Emprie of the 1800s?

As said, he could be a convicted criminal who found photography in prison. He paid his dues and now does good. Or what if he was a doctor who saved children in the Congo and was then fed up with death and danger. Should we think less of him of doing something less "worthy" now? Etc etc.

Look at the art. If you like it you like it. If you don't move on.



Jul 13, 2026 at 06:00 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

patotts
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I knew this post could/would come across of as judgemental, and with a risk posting. Not everyone can have the life journey of Sebastio Salgado. I still find Penman's background and position relevant, at least in my eyes.

Edited on Jul 13, 2026 at 07:34 AM · View previous versions



Jul 13, 2026 at 07:09 AM
johnvanr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


Ne314satel wrote:
Who cares who he was? He could have been in prison, even a criminal, but we'll judge him by his photos. A paparazzi was always a better man than a politician.


The last sentence literally makes no sense as a general statement.



Jul 13, 2026 at 07:22 AM
Luke_Miller
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I love my Nikon and Leica gear, but I just realized those two companies made optics for the German and Japanese militaries during WWII. Guess I will have to move to Hasselblad.


Jul 13, 2026 at 08:30 AM
RoamingScott
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


Since when does a street photographer (or any photographer at that rate) have to subscribe to any particular set of morals or values?


Jul 13, 2026 at 08:44 AM
johnvanr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


RoamingScott wrote:
Since when does a street photographer (or any photographer at that rate) have to subscribe to any particular set of morals or values?


I think the OP isn’t saying a street photographer has to be anything, but that he finds it a bit far-fetched that this particular street photographer is now being heralded by Leica and others as someone we should pay attention to because of his particular view or insights, not just because of his photographs.

There’s a difference between whether we appreciate someone’s work and leave it at that or also think that person has wisdom to share that we should take seriously.

Personally, there are photographers whose work I admire but who I think are full of it otherwise. It’s why I like Seanloup Sieff, who was a great photographer and refused to take himself or his profession too seriously.



Jul 13, 2026 at 09:26 AM
raizans
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


I respect the hustle, but then again, so many other photographers hustle and don’t get the recognition they deserve. The best thing Phil Penman has going for him is being a British male in a male-dominated industry. He’s got no real personal vision from what I can see at a cursory glance, and his work is mediocre for a full time photographer. If more women and POC photographers could be as mediocre and still get the same success, I’d feel differently. So yes, background does matter, but in a different way.


Jul 13, 2026 at 09:41 AM
RustyRus
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


raizans wrote:
I respect the hustle, but then again, so many other photographers hustle and don’t get the recognition they deserve. The best thing Phil Penman has going for him is being a British male in a male-dominated industry. He’s got no real personal vision from what I can see at a cursory glance, and his work is mediocre for a full time photographer. If more women and POC photographers could be as mediocre and still get the same success, I’d feel differently. So yes, background does matter, but in a different way.



So he is white and male that is why he is where he is- Got it-

Or maybe his BIO? His words but my guess is him just being a white dude isn't the whole picture.

The British-born, New York-based photographer Phil Penman has dedicated over 25 years documenting the ever-changing scene of New York City's streets. His distinctive black-and-white approach to street photography has cemented his reputation as one of the most significant visual chroniclers of the modern metropolis.


Before rising to prominence for his personal street work, Penman built a substantial career as a news and magazine photographer. His reportage has appeared in prestigious international publications, including The Guardian, Paris Match, National Geographic, Time Magazine,The Independent, and The New York Review of Books. Throughout this period, he photographed major public figures and captured historical events.

His dedication to documenting history is perhaps most evident in his powerful work following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the World Trade Center. This searing reportage has been featured across major news outlets like NBC's Today show, the BBC, the History Channel, and Al Jazeera, and his compelling images are now preserved within the archives of the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, serving as a vital record of that tragic day.

Penman's contributions to documenting modern American history have continued to earn high-level recognition. His poignant images covering the pandemic lockdown in New York City were acquired by the U.S. Library of Congress. This acquisition places his contemporary documentation alongside the work of legendary Depression-era documentarians such as Walker Evans and Dorothea Lange, underscoring the cultural and historical value of his photographs.

His signature street photography, characterized by its sharp contrasts and evocative sense of moment, has been widely exhibited. His work has been displayed in Galleries around the world. Most recently his work was shown as part of the 100 Year anniversary of Leica.

Penman is also an enthusiastic educator, touring the world to teach photography workshops for the renowned Leica Akademie. His expertise and influence in the field have been formally recognized; he was recently named among the “52 Most Influential Street Photographers,” a list that honors him alongside genre legends like Henri Cartier-Bresson, Sebastião Salgado, Diane Arbus, and Garry Winogrand.

His books have successfully brought his work to a broader audience:


Street (2019): This best-seller captured the raw energy and diverse life of New York's boroughs.

New York Street Diaries (2023): This follow-up also achieved best-seller status and was featured at the prestigious Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York, further establishing his place in the fine art photography world. The book sold over 7500 Copies in its first two years after release.

Big New York (2024): Where his work was featured alongside photographic legends Elliot Erwitt and Thomas Hoepker.
Street Scenes (2025): His most recent book launched as the number one Street Photography book on Amazon and continues to be sold around the world.



Jul 13, 2026 at 10:35 AM
patotts
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


Yes, always believe people's bios... just like you believe peoples descriptions of their careers on LinkedIn.


Jul 13, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Ne314satel
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman


raizans wrote:
If more women and POC photographers .


You know, I was born in a country where there was never any discrimination based on skin color or gender. What you're saying is complete bullshit. Just because a black man from Africa wins a marathon doesn't mean we need a quota for white men, and vice versa. If your photos sell, you're doing great. If not, there's no point in changing your gender or skin color.



Jul 13, 2026 at 10:43 AM
1bwana1
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #20 · Does a [street] photographers background matter? > Phil Penman



raizans wrote:
I respect the hustle, but then again, so many other photographers hustle and don’t get the recognition they deserve. The best thing Phil Penman has going for him is being a British male in a male-dominated industry. He’s got no real personal vision from what I can see at a cursory glance, and his work is mediocre for a full time photographer. If more women and POC photographers could be as mediocre and still get the same success, I’d feel differently. So yes, background does matter, but in a different way.


I strongly disagree that Penmans identity is somehow relevant to his success. He has clearly earned that success over many years, and through quality work. So sad that you fell the way you do about things.

As far as his relationship with Leica goes his race, and the fact that he is male is not relevant to his success. I think looking at what Leica does to encourage, finance, recognize, and reward female photographers, would be educational. Leica makes great efforts in this area. There are no male only programs. There are women and POC nominees, winners and judges. Of course when looking at the images one has no idea about photographer's identity as it is not relevant.




Edited on Jul 13, 2026 at 11:36 AM · View previous versions



Jul 13, 2026 at 11:20 AM
       2       3       end






FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register