RoamingScott wrote:
I still have no idea why anyone would buy the Z 35/1.2 just to get a lens that has more CA than its Chinese competition.
CA be damned, it is rarely apparent in use. The images simply appear superior from the Z lens than from the Viltrox. After testing both, the Viltrox was sent back, even given the weight and hefty price of the Z 35 1.2. The images in that review reinforce my conclusion. The Viltrox is also a garbage video lens.
I’d probably go Viltrox if the price difference is really that big. The Sigma is nicer to carry, but the Viltrox seems to have excellent IQ and AF for the money. The weight would be my only concern coming from the 35 GM
