I am not comparing resolution of Hasselblad and Leica lenses per se but comparing their optical qualities like wide open performance, distortion, subject isolation, micro contrast etc. I misspoke when I said the pixels are the same, I should have said the pixel sizes are the same between X2Dii and SL3.
Anyway to answer your question, I am not sure about the 2 posted images as they are web resolution. But if you compare 35-100 and V series lenses, their rendering, distortion, aberrations and contrast is the same. The Hasselblad image pipeline is one of the best (if not the best) but the V lenses or the zoom do not do justice. They are designed to be small and light. Some will be fine with the comprises but personally I do not care for these compromises. Hope this makes it clear.
