fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

  

Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8

  
 
MichaelErlewine
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8


Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8

Just a quick note to say how fine a lens the Hasselblad XCD 135mm f/2.8 lens is on the Hasselblad X2D Mark II. Yes, it very heavy, very bulky, and expensive too, yet it produces IMO incredible photos.

Here is the original and an enlargement of a photo of a female Bullfrog in one of the endless marshes of northern Michigan where I live. It also comes with a 1.7x teleconverter that is as fine an add-on as I know but still takes its little piece of IQ and light, so I seldom use it. I had and sold this lens but lived to regret it and saved and bought it back.






A crop







Original size




May 29, 2026 at 05:30 AM
MichaelErlewine
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8


With the XD 135 lens, I can’t see much difference (or enough to worry about) between the lens with and without the 1.7x TC. I am certain there is a difference, just not one that makes a difference. Oh yes, I will shoot without the TC most of the time, when I can. Yet, if I need a little extra closeness, I am confident that the TC does not sacrifice much of the image quality.

However, it does make the whole operation more clumsy to have the TC and the mount ring. If I can get away with handhold that is better, but without a tripod I have to go to AUTO ISO or auto something to compensate for my own shakiness and that does cost me image quality.

Here is another photo WITH the 1.7TC and I don't see much loss in quality.







May 31, 2026 at 06:59 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8


With TC's (in general), the degradation comes from them "spreading the light" (to achieve the magnification).

As the angular (trig) dispersion moves farther from the central axis, the "spread" becomes greater. Hence, when the subject / focal plane is on / closer to central axis (Zone A) ... it retains the least amount of degradation from the TC ... Zones B / C progressively more so.



May 31, 2026 at 07:14 AM
MichaelErlewine
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8


I appreciate your taking the time to explain how these TCs work. Here is one with the Nikon Z8 with the Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Lens + 1.7 TC. The color is quite good although less crop room.





Nikon NIKKOR Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Lens




Jun 11, 2026 at 06:13 AM
flash
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Hasselblad XCD 135mm, f/2.8


The XCD 1.7x is dedicated to the 135. It’s a part of the optical design of the lens. That’s why there’s almost no IQ loss at any aperture at any distance. They were literally made to be with each other. You could consider the TC as part of the optical design but removable.

Fun fact. If you’re using HC lenses with the non optical lens adaptor you can use the 1.7x on almost every HC lens. Some will also allow autofocus with the TC. Many will also give you IBIS as well. Not all but some.

Gordon



Jun 12, 2026 at 04:10 AM







FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account