fredmiranda.com
Login

Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner

  
 
madNbad
Online
Details
p.2 #1Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner
taildraggin wrote:
Boogers. I was hoping to cheap out with a used 60mm 2.8D on the FTZ at $150, rather than $5-600 on a too short Z macro that won't be used for anything but periodically scanning film.

Desmolicious wroteWhichever lens you get, make sure it is an AF 1:1 macro lens.
I started with mf 55 2.8 micro nikkor + extension tubes to get 1:1.

It was a life changing moment when I switched to an AF macro lens. W the 60g that I am now using instant pin sharp focus on the grain every single time. The clouds cleared, cherubs sang and the sun shone through with a single beam illuminating the Holga from whose film I was scanning.


This is what happens when the digital camera stays on the copy stand.




Sony A7CII, FE90 2.8 Macro, Negative Supply Pro Carrier 135, 4X5 Lightsource Pro 99 CRI

I used the Sony once as an actual camera. Took 36 pictures and put it back on the stand.
May 03, 2026 at 05:09 PM
Desmolicious
Offline
Details
p.2 #2Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner
taildraggin wrote:
Boogers. I was hoping to cheap out with a used 60mm 2.8D on the FTZ at $150, rather than $5-600 on a too short Z macro that won't be used for anything but periodically scanning film.

Desmolicious wroteWhichever lens you get, make sure it is an AF 1:1 macro lens.
I started with mf 55 2.8 micro nikkor + extension tubes to get 1:1.

It was a life changing moment when I switched to an AF macro lens. W the 60g that I am now using instant pin sharp focus on the grain every single time. The clouds cleared, cherubs sang and the sun shone through with a single beam illuminating the Holga from whose film I was scanning.


You can get a 60G used pretty cheap. Those AF with the FTZ adapter.
May 03, 2026 at 10:59 PM
geekcop
Online
Details
p.2 #3Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner
I ended up going for a Nikon 105mm 2.8G lens. It was cheaper than other options and I can deal with the added extension tubes when scanning.
May 04, 2026 at 04:30 AM
taildraggin
Offline
Details
p.2 #4Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner
geekcop wrote:
I ended up going for a Nikon 105mm 2.8G lens. It was cheaper than other options and I can deal with the added extension tubes when scanning.


...and, it's a better FL for macro (other uses). How wonky are the additional extensions?

May 04, 2026 at 04:53 AM
geekcop
Online
Details
p.2 #5Has anyone used the Nikon Z 50/2.8 MC with an easy35 scanner
Not that bad. The Easy35 tubes are rock solid. Just longer. I used two long and one short tube in the past. The shot below was with an even cheaper 105D lens that I sold due to sag in the front of the lens due to extension. I sold the original Easy35 and I have the new and improved V2 one on order. I'm just waiting for it to arrive. I have rolls waiting to be scanned once the new kit arrives.


F6, Vision3 50D, Nikkor 105mm 2.8D, Easy35 V1
May 04, 2026 at 05:06 AM


FM ForumsNikon ForumJoin Upload & Sell
  
 

You are not logged inLog inRegister