fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              4              7       8       end
  

NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released

  
 
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #1 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


It looks like Nikon basically copied what Sony did with their version II of the 70-200 f2.8 GM a few years ago in terms of size, weight, and optical performance improvements, so Nikon may finally be back on even terms again, or even slightly ahead.

I prefer the removable tripod foot on the Sony lens, which can be replaced with a properly functional Arca-Swiss (and QD) compatible foot.



Feb 24, 2026 at 08:12 PM
bernardl
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #2 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Cliff L. wrote:
I prefer the removable tripod foot on the Sony lens, which can be replaced with a properly functional Arca-Swiss (and QD) compatible foot.


What makes you think that the Arca-Swiss foot on the new Nikon is less "properly functional Arca-Swiss" than third party replacements?

Besides the Nikon design certainly makes it possible for third party companies to propose their own version if they think there is enough market for it.

Cheers,
Bernard





Feb 24, 2026 at 08:33 PM
davidrwilliams
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #3 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Lance B wrote:
I was fairly ambivalent about this new lens until I saw the specs and Jan Wegener's video and I am now questioning that thought. I am now thinking I may be able to sell both my old Z 70-200 f2.8 VR S I and Z 100-400 f4.5-5.6 VR S and just use the new 70-200 f2.8 VR S II with both teleconverters for a versatile zoom. The weight reduction is more than expected. The two tripod collar idea is great. Arca Swiss is no big deal for me as I never use a tripod. Clickable Control Ring was expected
...Show more

Same exact thoughts for me - I'm second on the pre-order list at my preferred local retailer.



Feb 24, 2026 at 10:56 PM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #4 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


bernardl wrote:
What makes you think that the Arca-Swiss foot on the new Nikon is less "properly functional Arca-Swiss" than third party replacements?



The fact that Nikon says not to use it in lever-style clamps, like you can with plates that meet the Arca-Swiss specifications.

With a lever-style clamp, you can visually tell the clamp is secured, something you cannot do with a round knob style clamp.



Feb 24, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Ai_Print
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #5 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Cliff L. wrote:
The fact that Nikon says not to use it in lever-style clamps, like you can with plates that meet the Arca-Swiss specifications.

With a lever-style clamp, you can visually tell the clamp is secured, something you cannot do with a round knob style clamp.


I have been using arca type plates and clamps for decades, with and without the slide stop screws and I am just not concerned about it at all. It’s an arca type dovetail, it will be fine for me at least since I always support the camera and lens by hand when carrying it on a tripod or monopod and I make it a habit of checking tightness on both the knob and levers often when on a shoot.



Feb 25, 2026 at 12:14 AM
EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #6 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Cliff L. wrote:
The fact that Nikon says not to use it in lever-style clamps, like you can with plates that meet the Arca-Swiss specifications.

With a lever-style clamp, you can visually tell the clamp is secured, something you cannot do with a round knob style clamp.


A-S did not set the specs used today by most. The plate/foot makers copied the dimensions of RRS for plates that will fit their awful lever lock system. The screw type locks are much more reliable and naturally compensate for slight variations in manufacturing and temperature.

EBH



Feb 25, 2026 at 01:46 AM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #7 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Arca-Swiss' own heads have at least two different QR plate designs that are not fully cross-compatible with all of their heads. Nikon is clearly aiming the lens to be compatible with the "classic" system.

Some third-party arca-swiss compatible products also don't fit each other. It's not surprising this system was avoided by the major camera manufacturers for so long.

bernardl wrote:
What makes you think that the Arca-Swiss foot on the new Nikon is less "properly functional Arca-Swiss" than third party replacements?

Besides the Nikon design certainly makes it possible for third party companies to propose their own version if they think there is enough market for it.

Cheers,
Bernard





Feb 25, 2026 at 01:58 AM
Masque
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #8 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Cliff L. wrote:
The fact that Nikon says not to use it in lever-style clamps, like you can with plates that meet the Arca-Swiss specifications.

With a lever-style clamp, you can visually tell the clamp is secured, something you cannot do with a round knob style clamp.


There are some very good Arca-Swiss lever locks, which have an adjustable clamp.

https://3leggedthing.com/en-uk/products/lever-clamp-config for one example.

Been using this one for years now, and the adjustability of the closed position has made up for many a small difference in foot width.

Nikon is surely just covering their bases, with policies aimed at the lowest common denominator.



Feb 25, 2026 at 02:38 AM
Ripolini
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #9 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


EB-1 wrote:
The screw type locks are much more reliable and naturally compensate for slight variations in manufacturing and temperature.


I have been using dovetail plates (A-S compatible) with screw type locks for decades without any problems.
After decades, Nikon has realized what the internationally recognized standard is. Or if they had already realized it before, they ignored it to save a few dollars in additional machining or to make cheaper die-cast molds without a dovetail profile. They finally woke up and realized that they can do it without going bankrupt
Better late than never.



Feb 25, 2026 at 03:04 AM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #10 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Ripolini wrote:
I have been using dovetail plates (A-S compatible) with screw type locks for decades without any problems.
After decades, Nikon has realized what the internationally recognized standard is. Or if they had already realized it before, they ignored it to save a few dollars in additional machining or to make cheaper die-cast molds without a dovetail profile. They finally woke up and realized that they can do it without going bankrupt
Better late than never.


It's not really a standard at all, as Arca-Swiss themselves make two cross-incompatible systems. Many of the prominent tripod manufacturers, Gitzo, Manfrotto, etc. make most of their heads with QR systems that are not Arca-Swiss plate compatible, though some are. Very few video heads or gimbal stabilizers are Arca-Swiss plate compatible.



Feb 25, 2026 at 03:18 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

HendrikV
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #11 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


RoamingScott wrote:
I've had the heavier 100-400 dangling from my Z9 for years with zero ill effects. I suspect it would take a sizable increase to put real stress on either.

The issue is that Nikon doesn’t clearly define what falls within safe limits. I know a photographer who actually had to repair the mount on his professional body after regularly using the older F-mount 70–200 without additional support. That kind of story does make you think.

At the same time, I see indeed plenty of photographers shooting heavy lenses without any support and seemingly never running into problems. The Z-mount does have a larger diameter, and it’s secured with four screws instead of five on the older F-mount. Whether that makes a practical difference in real-world durability is hard to say.

Anyway, we’re drifting off-topic a bit. Let’s just say lighter is better, and this lens really does look appealing. It might have to go on my list. 😉



Feb 25, 2026 at 03:18 AM
ISO1600
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #12 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


I just got hands on at Nikon Plaza Osaka, and it was very impressive. Focus was probably the quickest and quietest I've ever experienced. Lighter than expected.


Feb 25, 2026 at 03:31 AM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #13 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


HendrikV wrote:
The issue is that Nikon doesn’t clearly define what falls within safe limits. I know a photographer who actually had to repair the mount on his professional body after regularly using the older F-mount 70–200 without additional support. That kind of story does make you think.

At the same time, I see indeed plenty of photographers shooting heavy lenses without any support and seemingly never running into problems. The Z-mount does have a larger diameter, and it’s secured with four screws instead of five on the older F-mount. Whether that makes a practical difference in real-world durability is hard to say.


Nikon does indicate in the manuals of their heavier lenses that the lens should not be lifted from the camera without supporting the lens. E.g. 200-500/5.6, 200/2 etc.

What could cause damage to the mount is not just dependent on the mass of the lens (or the torque its weight distribution would apply to the mount when held horizontally without lens being supported) but how it is being handled. For example, if you hang the lens from the camera and go running (this is not unrealistic in some event or photojournalistic contexts) you might damage it even if just carrying the lens from the camera would not.



Feb 25, 2026 at 03:38 AM
Ripolini
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #14 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


ilkka_nissila wrote:
It's not really a standard at all, as Arca-Swiss themselves make two cross-incompatible systems. Many of the prominent tripod manufacturers, Gitzo, Manfrotto, etc. make most of their heads with QR systems that are not Arca-Swiss plate compatible, though some are. Very few video heads or gimbal stabilizers are Arca-Swiss plate compatible.


Technically speaking, you're right. There is probably no "official" document that provides requirements, specifications, guidelines or characteristics of A-S-like plates, clamps etc.
However, the (photographic) market has adopted it as a "standard" in the sense that it is by far the best, most reliable, and most "copied" system for securing the camera to the head of the tripod.
Most of serious nature photographers (and I know many of them having been a member of the executive board of the Italian Association of Nature Photographers) use A-S compatible heads & plates.
Manfrotto and Gitzo QR systems are BS. I replaced the QR system of my Manfrotto head with a RRS clamp. At present I own three tripods (2 Gitzo, 1 Manfrotto) and three heads all with A-S compatible clamps.
Even chinese manufactures adopt it (I have a Sunwayfoto head too, with A-S QR clamp perfectly compatible with all my A-S, Wimberley, Kirkphoto and RRS plates).
Do you know of chinese companies manufacturing Manfrotto or Gitzo compatible clamps? What? they don't make them due to royalties? Come on ... They don't make because nobody would buy them.
Even Nikon understands now, finally, that A-S-like systems are what most serious/pro photographers prefer and use.



Feb 25, 2026 at 03:48 AM
bernardl
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #15 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


ilkka_nissila wrote:
Arca-Swiss' own heads have at least two different QR plate designs that are not fully cross-compatible with all of their heads. Nikon is clearly aiming the lens to be compatible with the "classic" system.

Some third-party arca-swiss compatible products also don't fit each other. It's not surprising this system was avoided by the major camera manufacturers for so long.



Agreed, but all players are facing the same challenge, right? There is no reason why Nikon, who knows a thing or two about high quality manufacturing, would be less able than 3rd party providers to manufacture consistently lens feet that are compatible with the most frequent types of Arca-Swiss heads.

I personally have been using RRS brackets and plates for 20+ years on ball heads from Arca-Swiss, RRS, Peak Design, Gitzo,... some with clamps, some screw type... and I have never faced any issue.

So I read the disclaimer as one imposed by their legal team to avoid any risk of litigation. If that is what it took for their mgt to approve the release of their first Arca-Swiss type lens foot then I am totally fine with that.

And anyways, if I can get my hand on one, I will most probably use the lens without a lens foot most of the time considering how light it is. This makes the built-in Arca foot all the most appealing since I would have had a hard time justifying spending 150 US$ on a RRS part that I would probably not have used very often. And no, I won't fund the IP thieves at Leo photo by buying their products.

Cheers,
Bernard



Feb 25, 2026 at 04:36 AM
ilkka_nissila
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #16 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Ripolini wrote:
Technically speaking, you're right. There is probably no "official" document that provides requirements, specifications, guidelines or characteristics of A-S-like plates, clamps etc.
However, the (photographic) market has adopted it as a "standard" in the sense that it is by far the best, most reliable, and most "copied" system for securing the camera to the head of the tripod.
Most of serious nature photographers (and I know many of them having been a member of the executive board of the Italian Association of Nature Photographers) use A-S compatible heads & plates.
Manfrotto and Gitzo QR systems are BS. I replaced the QR system of
...Show more

Many supposedly "Arca-Swiss compatible" products don't actually fit each other. I've run into issues fitting various American, European, and Chinese quick-release products to each other though each claim "Arca-Swiss compatibility" (many will fit across products, but some do not). I've run into an American "Arca-Swiss compatible" tripod collar foot not fitting on an actual Arca-Swiss head (not a copy, the real thing). Furthermore, many people use the tripod foot on their palm (when hand-holding a lens, to avoid hitting the manual focus ring constantly) and IMO sharp edges of the dovetail can be uncomfortable against skin when there is some weight. It may be that Nikon rounded those edges, we'll see. Another thing is that while the Arca-Swiss dovetail has the advantage of supporting large weights, while the screw-type AS quick release is secure, it's a bit slow and clumsy to use compared to some other systems which are quick but not necessarily secure in supporting a large, heavy lens such as a 600/4. There is a reason why specifically (long-lens using) nature photographers like Arca-Swiss, but they're not the whole market.

Nikon recognizes today that video is a big driver of the camera sales, and yet products designed and used for support during video recording are typically not natively equipped with Arca-Swiss compatible QR systems, though there are exceptions. For example premium fluid heads are made by Sachtler and Cartoni, and finding these manufacturers' fluid head models with Manfrotto plate compatibility is easy but Arca-Swiss is not directly supported (unless adding a third-party clamp as another layer on top of the manufacturer's quick-release plate). DJI also supports a mixture of Manfrotto, Arca-Swiss plates in their gimbal stabilizers, but looking at what they say:

https://support.dji.com/help/content?customId=01700007720&spaceId=17&re=US&lang=en&documentType&paperDocType=ARTICLE

On the RS 4 and RS 4 Pro, they say "Third-party Arca-Swiss and Manfrotto quick-release plates may not be able to be installed on DJI RS 4/RS 4 Pro."

Reassuring, isn't it?

I prefer fluid heads for long lens photography (when using a tripod) because the lightweight teles that are available now are so light that when combined with a gripped Z8 or Z9 they won't balance correctly on a gimbal head, and yet fluid heads can include counterbalance mechanisms which do allow correct balancing of these lenses even with TC (I recently got the 400/4.5 which is an example of such a lens), and you can mount smaller lenses from the camera on fluid heads but cannot do so with gimbal heads. So it's overall more practical solution for my needs. However, larger fluid heads that provide smooth movements for longer focal lengths, don't natively support Arca-Swiss QR plates. Gitzo's fluid gimbal does support Arca-Swiss compatible feet but it cannot be used to mount the camera for use with smaller lenses.

Nikon putting a specific quick-release plate in a lens collar supplied with the lens doesn't really solve the problem which is lack of standards in the field. Nikon themselves noting that it should only be used with the screw-lock and not fliplock heads illustrates one aspect of the problem.

I tried mounting my Arca-Swiss compatible plate on my DJI RS Mini 4 and it wouldn't fit, I had to use the one that came with the gimbal stabilizer. I could get an adapter from Smallrig, though, which is specifically made to make mounting Arca-Swiss compatible camera plates to this particular gimbal stabilizer.

The international standards organization (ISO should work on standardizing quick-release systems to solve the problem.



Feb 25, 2026 at 05:07 AM
Lee Saxon
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #17 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


RRS uses a 1.5" dovetail width for their standard, whereas experimentally I think original Arca Swiss is 38mm, which is very close. FWIW, anecdotally, I've had a lot of plates machined to 38mm that work perfectly in RRS lever release clamps (they use a stack of bevel washers that lets the clamp "auto-adjust" to some modest variance in plate size).


Feb 25, 2026 at 05:12 AM
Ai_Print
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #18 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


My Swarovski spotting scope has an Arca compatible foot, not sure of the spec or not but it works great across all my tripod heads. I even replaced the foot on my Hasselblad V series bodies to Arca type plates for full compatibility. So this is a very good move from Nikon.

Only one tripod heads uses the lever lock and it has a tension adjustment knob and that is my Acratech head, the rest are knobs.



Feb 25, 2026 at 09:53 AM
JadedWriter
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #19 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Just put in my NPS priority delivery request.


Feb 25, 2026 at 10:58 AM
JadedWriter
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #20 · NIKON Z 70–200mm f/2.8 VR S II Released


Another good video on the lens:

?si=sUH-NqhtYJea1LeN



Feb 25, 2026 at 11:01 AM
1       2              4              7       8       end






FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2              4              7       8       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account