Muhammad Ali - 1972
p.1 #3Muhammad Ali - 1972
Great image showing so well an outstanding athlete and personality - such a contrast to what he sadly became in later life due to the damage caused by his craft.
Feb 04, 2026 at 06:36 AM
p.1 #4Muhammad Ali - 1972
Incredible image and memory. The image is so nicely done, it looks like it is from a planned portrait session.
Ali was a legendary figure who transcended all of sports to become one of the most recognizable figures in history. He was known on a truly global scale.
Ali was a legendary figure who transcended all of sports to become one of the most recognizable figures in history. He was known on a truly global scale.
Apr 01, 2026 at 05:23 AM
p.1 #6Muhammad Ali - 1972
Would love to see the actual image. Wondering about all that weird stuff going on with the rope and the background. Where's the second rope down? Doubtful it just dropped off behind his back. Again, can we see the original image?
Apr 08, 2026 at 11:58 AM
p.1 #7Muhammad Ali - 1972
krug wrote:
Great image showing so well an outstanding athlete and personality - such a contrast to what he sadly became in later life due to the damage caused by his craft.
Thanks.
Great image showing so well an outstanding athlete and personality - such a contrast to what he sadly became in later life due to the damage caused by his craft.
Thanks.
Apr 08, 2026 at 12:43 PM
|
p.1 #8Muhammad Ali - 1972
apollo11 wrote:
Incredible image and memory. The image is so nicely done, it looks like it is from a planned portrait session.
Ali was a legendary figure who transcended all of sports to become one of the most recognizable figures in history. He was known on a truly global scale.
Thanks. A lot of post-processing to the original terrible image.
Incredible image and memory. The image is so nicely done, it looks like it is from a planned portrait session.
Ali was a legendary figure who transcended all of sports to become one of the most recognizable figures in history. He was known on a truly global scale.
Thanks. A lot of post-processing to the original terrible image.
Apr 08, 2026 at 12:45 PM
p.1 #10Muhammad Ali - 1972
Scott Sewell wrote:
Would love to see the actual image. Wondering about all that weird stuff going on with the rope and the background. Where's the second rope down? Doubtful it just dropped off behind his back. Again, can we see the original image?
What the original 'snapshot' taken 54 years ago looks like is irrelevant. The image I presented now is all I am concerned about and is all you get to see. Take it, or leave it.
Would love to see the actual image. Wondering about all that weird stuff going on with the rope and the background. Where's the second rope down? Doubtful it just dropped off behind his back. Again, can we see the original image?
What the original 'snapshot' taken 54 years ago looks like is irrelevant. The image I presented now is all I am concerned about and is all you get to see. Take it, or leave it.
Apr 08, 2026 at 12:50 PM
p.1 #11Muhammad Ali - 1972
Imagemaster wrote:
What the original 'snapshot' taken 54 years ago looks like is irrelevant. The image I presented now is all I am concerned about and is all you get to see. Take it, or leave it.
Woah!! Mmmkay. Getting a bit defensive there, master Tony. Just thought you'd have a cool version of the original to share.
Tells me maybe that image from 54 years ago might not look so hot without heavy (and horrible) masking. But you do you. I know now not to bother checking out any of your future posts.
Scott Sewell wrote
Would love to see the actual image. Wondering about all that weird stuff going on with the rope and the background. Where's the second rope down? Doubtful it just dropped off behind his back. Again, can we see the original image?Woah!! Mmmkay. Getting a bit defensive there, master Tony. Just thought you'd have a cool version of the original to share.
Tells me maybe that image from 54 years ago might not look so hot without heavy (and horrible) masking. But you do you. I know now not to bother checking out any of your future posts.
Apr 08, 2026 at 10:13 PM
p.1 #12Muhammad Ali - 1972
Scott Sewell wrote:
Tells me maybe that image from 54 years ago might not look so hot without heavy (and horrible) masking. But you do you. I know now not to bother checking out any of your future posts.
Awesome you could figure that out. I didn't know this was the Critique Forum or Post-processing & Printing Forum.
Bye, bye.
Tells me maybe that image from 54 years ago might not look so hot without heavy (and horrible) masking. But you do you. I know now not to bother checking out any of your future posts.
Awesome you could figure that out. I didn't know this was the Critique Forum or Post-processing & Printing Forum.
Bye, bye.
Apr 08, 2026 at 10:28 PM
p.1 #14Muhammad Ali - 1972
Thanks, a lot of people like it, except for one Whiner. 
Sep 18, 2026 at 01:03 PM