fredmiranda.com

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site

New Feature: SMS Notification alert

New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist

FM Forums | General Gear-talk | Join Upload & Sell

2 end

2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses ...

Lethimcook
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #1 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

I had the pleasure of visiting the Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibit today and I also picked up the hardcover portfolio book. 98 images. I thought I would do a quick write down of the gear used and list out the most popular systems. I know that the winners have been announced for a while, but I finally had time to wind down this month to visit the exhibit. All the images are available online here. You could also look at the EXIF data and look for the most popular lenses.

For the raw numbers on the systems used by winners/highly commended,the breakdown is as follows:
Nikon-39
Sony - 17
DJI-9
Olympus/OM - 4
Fuji- 4
Canon - 23
Vivo - 1 (smartphone)
X-ray machine - 1

However, 3 categories included a portfolio of 6 images, so I subtracted 5 from the count of the companies to reduce the 6 image portfolio bias. Note that certain photographers had won multiple times in a given category, but because those images are judged on their merit as a solo image, I've decided not to reduce the system count.

After subtraction for portfolio bias:
Nikon-35
Sony - 12
DJI-4
Olympus/OM - 4
Fuji- 4
Canon - 23
Vivo - 1
X-ray machine - 1

Looking at the general trends. Aperture tends to be no wider than 2.8 very often. Zooms are very popular. Primes are popular for macro photography which is obvious. I'm not super familiar with all the brands models and lenses so I invite others to comment on anything interesting they notice.

For the whole list roughly broken down, its here:

Grand title Winner + Urban Life Winner:
Nikon D810 + 17-35mm f2.8 at 2.8 + 2 flashes

Behaviour Mammals Winner:
Canon EOS 1DX Mark 2 + 600 f.4 at 5.6
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Canon EOS 5 + 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 at 7.1
Fuji X-S10, Tamron +150-500mm f5-6.7 at 5.6
Canon EOS R3 + 600mm F4 at 8
Nikon Z9 + 600mm f4 + 1.4tele, at f6.3

Behaviour Birds Winner:
Nikon Z9 + 400mm f2.8 at f5
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon Z8 +400mm f4.5 at f8
Canon EOS R5 + 200mm F2 at F2
Nikon Z9 + 600mm f4 at f8
Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 + 100-300 f.28 + 1.4tele at f13

Behaviour Amphibians and Reptiles Winner:
Canon EOS 7D Mark 2 + 17-40mm F4 lens at 24mm at F16, 4 flashes + softbox
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon D850 + Laowa 15mm f4 macro at F14 + flash
Sony a7RII + Canon 60mm f2.8 lens at F8 + 2 strobes

Behaviour Invertebrates Winner:
Olympus OM-D E M1-Mark III + 90mm f3.5 lens at F22, flash
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Canon EOS R6 + 85mm F2 macro lens at f10, flash and diffuser
Canon EOS R6 Mark II + 100mm f2.8 macro at F4, focus stack
Fujifilm X-H2 + 80mm f2.8 macro at F22
Panasonic Lumix S1 RII + Sigma 150-600mm f5-f6.3 at F8

Urban Life Winner, see above:
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + Sigma 24mm 1.4 at f7.1
Canon EOS 77D + 24-70 f4 at f4.5, ambient plus torch light
Sony a7R V + 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 at f6.3
Nikon D750 + 24-120mm f4 at F8 , flash

Under Water Winner:
Nikon D850 + 28-70mm f3.5-4.5 at F14, 2 sea strobes
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon D850 + 28-70mm f3.5-4.5 at F14, 2 sea strobes (same as winner)
Canon EOS R5 + 8-15mm f4 at f6.3
Canon EOS 5D Mark III + 16-35mm f4 at 16mm at f11, 2 sea strobes
Nikon D500 + Tokina 10-17mm lens at F9, strobe

Portraits winner:
Nikon Z9 + 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 at f29
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon D90 + Tokina 11-16 f2.8 at F11, speedlight
Nikon D7200 + 18-55mm f3.5 at F11, 2 flashes
Canon EOS R5+ 200-400 F4 + 1.4x tele at F8
Canon EOS R5 + 24-105 F4 at f11

Natural Artistry winner:
Canon EOS R5 + Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50mm f1.8 + 16mm extension tube at f2.8
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV + 24-70mm f4 at F13, polarizing filter
Sony a7R IV + 90mm f2.8 macro, 2 flashes
Nikon Z6 + 24-70mm f4 at f13, ND filter
Canon EOS R5 + 100-500mm f4.5-7.1 at f32
Canon EOS R5 + 65mm f2.8 at f5.6 focus stack

Oceans the bigger picture winner:
Canon EOS R5 + 15-35mm f2.8 at 15mm at f4.5, flash, led torch
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon Z9 + 24-70 f2.8 at 38mm, f22
X-ray unit...not going to write down the model

Animals in their environment:
Nikon Z6 + 24-70mm at 24mm, f5.6, flash and diffuser, light stand
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
DJI Mavic 3 pro, Hasselblad L2d-20c 24mm f2.8 at f3.5
Sony a7R III + 70-200mm f2.8 at f5.6
Fujufilm GFX100 II + 500mm f5.6 lens at f26
Sony a1 + 200-600mm f5.6-6.3 at 284mm, f6.3
Canon EOS R5 + 500mm f4 at f4.5

Wetlands the bigger picture winner:
Nikon Z7 + 105mm f2.8 at f9
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
DJI Mavic 2 pro + Hasselblad L1d-20c 28mm f2.8 lens at f5.6
Sony a7R II + Nikonos RS 13mm f2.8 at f8, strobes
Nikon D810 + 70-200 f2.8 at 70mm f2.8

Plants and fungi winner:
Nikon Z9 + Laowa 15mm f4 macro lens, f16, ultraviolet torch
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon d500 + 10mm f2.8 at f5.6, ultraviolet torch
Nikon D7200 + 10.5mm f2.8 at F16, flash + diffuser

Photojournalism winner:
Nikon Z9 + 24-120mm f4 at 24mm f7.1, LED light
Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon D850 + 24-70mm f2.8 at 28mm f22, flash
Sony a1 + 70-200mm f2.8 at 88mm f4.5
Nikon Z9 + 24-70mm f2.8 at 40mm at f3.2
DJI Mavic Pro 3 + Hasselblad L2d-20c 24mm 2.8, at f4

Photojournalist story award winner (6 images)
Sony a7R IV + 20mm f1.8 at f14, flash
Sony a7R III + 24-70mm f2.8 at 44mm f10
Sony a7R IV + 24-70mm 2.8 at 44mm flash
Sony a7R IV + 24-70mm f2.8 at 36 at f13 flash
Sony a1 + 90mm f2.8 macro at f16, 2 flashes
Sony a7R III + 28mm f2 at f10

Rising star portfolio award ( 6 images)
Nikon D850 + tamron 15-30mm f2.8 at 15mm f22, flash
Nikon Z8 + 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 at 180mm at f18
Nikon Z8 + 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 at 180mm at f32
Nikon Z8 + 200-500mm f5.6 at 500mm f5.6
Nikon Z8 + 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 at 600 at f6.3
Nikon D850+ 200-500 f5.6 at 500mm f5.6

Portfolio award (6 images)
DJI Mavic 3 Classic + Hasselblad L2d-20c 24mm f2.8 at f2.8
DJI Mavic 3 Classic + Hasselblad L2d-20c 24mm f2.8 at f2.8
DJI Mavic 2 + Hasselblad L1d-20c 28mm f2.8 at f2.8
DJI Mavic 2 Pro + Hasselblad L1d-20c 28mm f2.8 at f2.8
DJI Mavic 2 Pro + Hasselblad L1d-20c 28mm f2.8 at f2.8
DJI Mavic 2 Pro + Hasselblad L1d-20c 28mm f2.8 at f2.8

The Young Wildlife photographer of the year award winner and 15-17 years old winner:
Nidkon D7100 + Tokina 10-17mm f3.5-4.5 at 17mm f8, flash and diffuser

Runner-up / Highly Commended for the 15-17 category:
Sony a1 + 28-60mm f4-f5.6 at f22, flash
Nikon D810 + Tamron 150-600mm f4.5 at f6.3
Fujifilm X-H2 + Laowa 65mm f2.8 at f5.6, flash and diffuser focus stack
OM System Om-1 + 60mm f2.8 at f10, flash and diffuser
Nikon Z8 + Tamron 150-600mm f5-f6.3 at f20
Sony a1 + 12-24 f2.8 at f22, flash
OM System Om-1 Mark II + Panasonic Leica DG Vario 100-400 f4-f6.3 at f22
Fujifilm X-H2 + Laowa 65mm f2.8 at f5.6, flash and diffuser focus stack

11-14 years winner:
Canon EOS R7 + 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 at 140 + tele, at f8

Runner-up / Highly Commended:
Nikon D850 + Sigma 105mm f2.8 at F11, flash and diffuser
Canon EOS R5 + 100-500 f4.5-f7.1 at 500mm
Nikon Z8 + 180-600mm f5.6-6.3 at 600mm at f6.3
Vivo X100 Ultra + 23mm built in lens at f2.2 (smart phone!)
Canon EOS 47 + 100-400 f4.5-5.6 at 400mm + 1.4 tele at f8
Nikon Z8 + 100-400 f4.5-5.6 lens at 100mm at f4.5

10 and under winner:
Nikon z9 + 105mm f2.8 at f10, flash and diffuser

Runner-up / Highly Commended:
OM System OM-1 + 100-400mm f5-6.3 at 400mm at f6.3
Sony A1 + 400mm f2.8 + 2x tele at f8
Nikon z9 + 105mm f2.8 at f13, flash and diffuser (same as winner)
Sony a1 + 100-400 f4.5-5.6 at 185mm at f7.1
Nikon Z9 + 800mm f6.3 at f6.3 (same as winner)

Edited on Dec 19, 2025 at 08:23 PM · View previous versions

Dec 19, 2025 at 05:54 PM

jcw1982
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #2 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

2 photogs in the 10 and under category shooting Z9's

Man that hurts.

Edited on Dec 19, 2025 at 07:58 PM · View previous versions

Dec 19, 2025 at 07:42 PM

Lethimcook
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #3 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

In this instance it's actually the same person for all 3 Z9s, Jamie Start. I think she might have been the person to have the most solo submissions as part of the gallery (on top of being the overall category winner).

Dec 19, 2025 at 07:57 PM

Imagemaster
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #4 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Boy do you have a lot of time on your hands.

Pretty well most of the winning photographers could have still won their category using any of the other gear. Then of course are the 99% of wildlife photographers that never entered that contest.

Dec 19, 2025 at 11:55 PM

Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #5 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Imagemaster wrote:
Boy do you have a lot of time on your hands.

On average, people spend/waste 2-2.5 hours per day on social media and 6.5-7 hours per day on the Internet.
I appreciate that he has devoted such time to obtaining data and providing information.

Lethimcook wrote:
I had the pleasure of visiting the Wildlife Photographer of the Year exhibit today and I also picked up the hardcover portfolio book. ...
I made similar statistics for 2024 WPYC for sensor size, resolution, kind of camera & brand. I didn't correct data for portfolios et similia. I plotted the results:

I made several comparisons over the years too:

Dec 20, 2025 at 06:03 AM

Lethimcook
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #6 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Ripolini: Glad I'm not the only one that thought of going down this weird rabbit hole. It is interesting!

Imagemaster: Missing the forest for the trees. I hope you know that you are lacking in basic decorum. You first start off your comment with a personal jab that is neither warranted or necessary (really, just keep it to yourself and the message remains the same). Then you follow up with the weakest argument while pointing out the obvious. Let me draw a parallel.

I say:
"Most of the winners of the Boston Marathon wore Nike shoes, isn't that interesting? Let's gather data on all the runners in the top 100."

To which you reply:
"Yeah but lets be real, any of those top 100 runners would have placed regardless of their shoe brand. Lets not forget about the other 99% of runners in the world too!"

And you're pointing this out on a forum dedicated to running, under the section "General Gear-Talk" or whatever the equivalent would be. Do you walk into car conventions or award ceremonies and spout off about how what brand of car you drive really doesn't matter? In some semantic ways you are not wrong, but it seems like you can't read the room.

Dec 20, 2025 at 12:17 PM

Imagemaster
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #7 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Hey, if you or others find all that data interesting, great.

Bottom line is that it was the photographers' skill that was more important than the gear.

Sorry about that shattering personal jab. Did not know you have no sense of humor. Or maybe it is just the Toronto weather.

Dec 20, 2025 at 12:50 PM

Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #8 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Lethimcook wrote:
Ripolini: Glad I'm not the only one that thought of going down this weird rabbit hole. It is interesting!

Actually I have all 35 Portfolio books, starting with Portfolio One from 1991 up to the latest one (Portfolio 35, 2025 edition).
This small library provides an insight into the evolution of nature photography over the last thirty-five years, and since each image has always been accompanied by technical data, we can also understand the evolution of the tools used for wildlife/macro/landscape photography, both from a technical and commercial point of view.

It is obvious that the photographer remains the most important element in obtaining a high-quality image (otherwise it would not appear among those awarded and recommended at the WPYC). Just as it is obvious that a good pianist would play more than well on any instrument. Strange, however, that Steinway and Fazioli pianos are used in concerts and recording studios...
Returning to the data, what emerges is that Canon's monopoly (king of AF in the film era) has declined, and that Nikon has gradually grown over time, catching up and often surpassing everyone else. Sony has emerged, but it is not the prevailing photographic system when considering the pinnacle of nature photography. DSLRs continue to be used, and 24 Mpix is still more than enough in a world that has reached 60 Mpix.
Many other considerations and more detailed analyses could be made, but there is not enough time here.

Dec 20, 2025 at 01:19 PM

Imagemaster
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On

p.1 #9 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Ripolini wrote:
It is obvious that the photographer remains the most important element in obtaining a high-quality image (otherwise it would not appear among those awarded and recommended at the WPYC).

Ditto

Just as it is obvious that a good pianist would play more than well on any instrument. Strange, however, that Steinway and Fazioli pianos are used in concerts and recording studios...

The reputation of both pianos and cameras can keep the belief that they are the best for many years after newer ones have been proven to be better.

Not my opinion:

Top piano choices in 2025 include the Yamaha Clavinova CLP-885 for best overall digital, Kawai CA901 for authentic feel, and Steinway & Sons for premium acoustic, alongside high-end options from B�sendorfer and Sauter. Top-tier digital grands are led by the Yamaha N3X AvantGrand and Roland GP9.

Of course unlike cameras or other musical instruments, pianos are not the easiest object to move from location to location.

Dec 20, 2025 at 03:36 PM

Lethimcook
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #10 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Wow what a collection. National History Museum's gallery only dates back to 2010. I would love to see the books from folio one onward.

Using the system count accounting for portfolio bias, 2025 looks like:
Nikon: 42%
Canon: 27%
Sony: 14%
Other Systems: 14% (Fuji+DJI/Hasselblad+OM)
Novelty: 2% (Smartphone + X-ray)

Looks vaguely similar to 2024. I find it interesting that Sony was only at 5% in 2020, and now they've basically tripled their presence at the expense of Canon.

Dec 20, 2025 at 03:39 PM

gdanmitchell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #11 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Deleted duplicate post

Edited on Dec 23, 2025 at 11:07 PM · View previous versions

Dec 20, 2025 at 11:28 PM

gdanmitchell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #12 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

To restate the most important and obvious conclusion concisely: Good photographers make great photographs using a very wide range of gear of all types and from every manufacturer you�ve heard of.

Dec 20, 2025 at 11:29 PM

Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #13 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Lethimcook wrote:
Wow what a collection. National History Museum's gallery only dates back to 2010. I would love to see the books from folio one onward.

Yes, since 2020, the book has been published by the NHM. In the previous ten years, the book was published by BBC. Portfolios One to Ten were published by Fountain Press (in my collection, I have the German edition of Portfolios Two and Nine, published by Tecklenborg Verlag; I don't remember why, but probably because they were cheaper than the British edition):

Lethimcook wrote:
Using the system count accounting for portfolio bias, 2025 looks like:
Nikon: 42%
Canon: 27%
Sony: 14%
Other Systems: 14% (Fuji+DJI/Hasselblad+OM)
Novelty: 2% (Smartphone + X-ray)

Looks vaguely similar to 2024. I find it interesting that Sony was only at 5% in 2020, and now they've basically tripled their presence at the expense of Canon.

It is rather surprising to note that Nikon seems to be the brand of choice for many nature photographers (or least those who take outstanding pictures

) for several years now. I guess the choices made in terms of new cameras and lenses, along with the brand's reputation and service, have contributed to this result, although limited to what I imagine is a rather niche market.
If you look at my graph above, you will notice that the resolution distribution function (Mpix) is bimodal, with two modes, one at 18-24 Mpix, the other at 37-47 Mpix. This suggests that cameras with 18-24 Mpix are still widely used and perfectly capable of producing outstanding images. There is a reason why I have stuck with 24 Mpix for years

It would be interesting to see if the use of high-res (> 36 Mpix) cameras increased or not in 2025 with respect to 2024.
As for Sony, I would like to point out that 1) it does not manufacture DSLR cameras, which are still in use, and 2) it is easier to triple small figures (from 5% to 15%) than double-digit percentages (Nikon and Canon).

Dec 21, 2025 at 04:55 AM

robstein
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #14 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

I love that there is 1 X-Ray image

It's not a bad image but I think the xray machine is a bit of a one trick pony

Dec 21, 2025 at 05:32 PM

EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #15 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

robstein wrote:
I love that there is 1 X-Ray image

It's not a bad image but I think the xray machine is a bit of a one trick pony

They should have included CT, MRI, and PET maybe not just X-Ray?

EBH

Dec 21, 2025 at 09:47 PM

EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #16 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

gdanmitchell wrote:
To restate the most important and obvious conclusion concisely: Good photographers make great photographs using a very wide range of gear of all types and from every manufacturer you�ve heard of.

All the results show is about what the judges are looking for more than anything else.
Much of that gear is not very good or modern. Some I'd have junked by the 2020s.
And even with the better gear some are at ridiculously small apertures where the lens won't perform well.

EBH

Dec 23, 2025 at 02:56 AM

Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #17 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

EB-1 wrote:
All the results show is about what the judges are looking for more than anything else.

In ALL photographic competitions the selection of winning images is made *subjectively* by the judges.
It's very unlikely that the judges select pictures on the basis of the gear used: they don't know who took the pictures and technical data. Therefore, considering the huge number of pictures submitted to WPYC every year, the gear utilized to take winning and commended images should have a statistical (unbiased) relevance in terms of brand, resolution (Mpix), etc.
Moreover, we are not discussing here about the quality of the images. The quality is there and everybody can see it.
It's like Academy Awards; the best film isn't necessarily liked by everyone. That doesn't take away from the fact that the movie has qualities that are well above average.

EB-1 wrote:
Much of that gear is not very good or modern. Some I'd have junked by the 2020s.
Please, provide figures: how many picture were taken with "not very good or modern" gear??
10%? 50% ?
Anyway, let's assume that your statement is correct; this implies that we do not need the latest and most updated camera or lens to take very good pictures. Many "outdated" cameras are still excellent in term of overall performance and quality of large prints we can make from files.
We all should be aware that manufacturers like Sony, Canon, Nikon, etc. continually introduce high-end cameras and lenses, which create new possibilities and set industry standards, stimulating demand for new "updated" equipment. However, looking at recent years, I'm not so sure that pictures taken today are *better* than those taken 5-10 years ago.
Serious and pro photographers select gear not only on the basis of resolution (Mpix, lp/mm of lenses, etc.). There are several other contributing factors (brand reputation, quality of service, availability of spare parts ...).

EB-1 wrote:
And even with the better gear some are at ridiculously small apertures where the lens won't perform well.
Diffraction is an overestimated issue.
I shoot my 14-30 @ f/16 for sunstars, thus sacrificing lines/mm. Who cares? The lens has quite remarkable flare resistance and very few ghosts, performing better than some UWA primes ...
The same applies to my Zeiss ZF.2 21/2.8: when I want to get sunstars, I have to close to at least f/16, which is certainly not the aperture at which it has maximum resolution.
Now, if - for example - Marc Costermans took the picture @ f/13 (https://www.nhm.ac.uk/wpy/gallery/2025-sunrise-hop?tags=ed.current), well, he must have had his reasons; for example, he may have wanted to make the background and therefore the environment where the black grouse live sufficiently legible. For the *nature photographer*, this was perhaps much more important than a few extra lines per millimeter....
Similarly, the Frolicking Frogs by Quentin Martinez (https://www.nhm.ac.uk/wpy/gallery/2025-frolicking-frogs?tags=ed.current) were photographed at f/16 obviously to have enough depth of field. He used 4 flashes with homemade softbox to perfectly light the scene.
I bet the two photographers I mentioned above do not always use small apertures ...

Dec 23, 2025 at 06:53 AM

EB-1
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #18 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

I'm certainly glad not to be photographer and entering contests.

EBH

Dec 23, 2025 at 11:18 AM

gdanmitchell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #19 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

EB-1 wrote:
All the results show is about what the judges are looking for more than anything else.
Much of that gear is not very good or modern. Some I'd have junked by the 2020s.
And even with the better gear some are at ridiculously small apertures where the lens won't perform well.

EBH

Again, kind of proving my point: Photographers with vision and skill make great photographs using a wide range of gear of almost every type from every manufacturer.

Those looking for �The Best Gear� by counting which brands and models are getting the most awards in some contest are barking up the wrong tree.

Edited on Dec 23, 2025 at 11:08 PM · View previous versions

Dec 23, 2025 at 12:01 PM

Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off

p.1 #20 · 2025 Wildlife Photographer of the Year winners' camera bodides + lenses data

Here, no one is looking for �The Best Gear� by counting anything. I understand that you don't understand, so don't lecture us. Oh, in case you didn't know, data always contains information. Slogans don't.

Dec 23, 2025 at 12:22 PM

1 2 end
FM Forums \| General Gear-talk \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 end