Nothing good in terms of Z lenses. A lot more F Mount. Z5 II sells out like hot cakes as usual, it's like someone sits there and refreshes the page every minute and buys them up
Surprised to see the 500mm F4G ED VR substantially more expensive than the 500mm F4E FL... Both of them dramatically above prices for used copies in near mint condition.
It zooms externally like all of them do. If you want internal zooming cough up the cash for the 24-70 2.8SII. Alpha_Geist wrote:
As someone who never owned a Nikon F-mount 24-70mm (f/4 or f/2.8), I picked up the 24-70mm f/2.8E for $849 refurbished. I'm happy!
GroovyGeek wrote:
Surprised to see the 500mm F4G ED VR substantially more expensive than the 500mm F4E FL... Both of them dramatically above prices for used copies in near mint condition.
Pretty typical, all their superteles have stayed well above resale even on refurb. I’ve been staring at the old PFs for far too long…
JadedWriter wrote:
It zooms externally like all of them do. If you want internal zooming cough up the cash for the 24-70 2.8SII.
The S or S Mk II is better, but for my use, $850 for the F mount 24-70 is great when still using DSLRs. I don't have any native zooms for my Z7II or Zf (mainly a prime user), but I can adapt the f/2.8E to Z mount if I need to.
I put the E on my Z9 once and I was like, "man, this is front heavy." Should work well enough though. Alpha_Geist wrote:
The S or S Mk II is better, but for my use, $850 for the F mount 24-70 is great when still using DSLRs. I don't have any native zooms for my Z7II or Zf (mainly a prime user), but I can adapt the f/2.8E to Z mount if I need to.
AdaptedLenses wrote:
Pretty typical, all their superteles have stayed well above resale even on refurb. I’ve been staring at the old PFs for far too long…
Sure, but why is the F4G nearly $2k more than the newer F4E?
