PureMichigan
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
 p.1 #16 · Who has the Sigma 200 f2 for Sony? Thoughts? | |
Looping back to fulfill a promise to give a brief review of the Laowa 200mm f/2 lens. I’ve been using it extensively over the past month shooting high school and D2/D3 college basketball. I'm not going to go in incredible depth here nor am I pixel peeping. This is sort of a short-term real world use review. Note that I likely would have purchased a Nikon OEM version of this optic but the company has not indicated any interest in making one for mirrorless. Nikon has relased a total on ONE new S line lenses in 2025. So it may be a lifetime before they get around to it. The new Sigma looks terrific but it's not available for Nikon, and the adapters are still a little wonky, from what I read. All that said ....
Build Quality: 9/10
The lens features a solid metal body, and the tolerances on all moving parts/switches feel excellent. It’s great to have a native Arca-Swiss foot included rather than needing an aftermarket solution. That said, it’s probably irresponsible to make long-term durability claims after less than two months of indoor use. We’ll see how it holds up under regular wear and tear. Still, out of the box, I’m pleasantly surprised—especially given the price point. I’ll also set aside the fact that I’m not a fan of the purple color. Black would have been just fine, thank you.
Handling: 9/10
This is where the lens really shines. I own a Nikon 200mm f/2, which is fantastic—but also like carrying around a baby rhino. That lens is one of my favorites, but the sheer size, weight, and the need to adapt from Nikon F mount pushed me to try this Laowa. In terms of size, it’s roughly comparable to a 70–200mm f/2.8, though it feels ~25% heavier. It’s not lightweight by any stretch, but compared to the Nikon 200mm f/2 it’s a flea. Balance on the camera is excellent. It's a straight barrel rather than the fat-front Nikon where the weight is shifted forward. I used to think twice about bringing the Nikon out due to the “PITA factor.” That’s no longer an issue. This lens drops into my bag easily—it’s like adding any heavy lens, but not like stuffing a Kia into a roller bag.
Focus Speed & Accuracy: 8/10
This lens was widely reviewed by YouTubers before the final production model was released, and focus speed and accuracy were common concerns. Based on my use for basketball, I find it more than capable. It’s 2025—there are no truly slow-focusing lenses anymore. It’s all about fine-tuning autofocus systems that would have seemed miraculous a decade ago. This lens is absolutely fast enough to keep up with college basketball.
Focus acquisition may be slightly slower than some Nikon S-line OEM lenses, but only by a hair . Accuracy is well within what I’d consider acceptable for professional sports use, and I wouldn’t hesitate to rely on it in that context. For perspective, if I had this level of focus speed and accuracy on my old Nikon D5 DSLR, that combo would have been considered king of the hill focus wise. Standards evolve—but I think most users will be very pleasantly surprised.
Sharpness: 8.5/10
I’ll hedge slightly here: An 8.5 overall, but closer to a 9 for my sports use. Some reports mention weaker edge sharpness. That’s irrelevant for how I use this lens. Center sharpness is on par with my Nikon F-mount 200mm f/2, and I’d challenge anyone to reliably tell the difference in real-world shooting scenarios. I’m not pixel-peeping at 300%—I don’t need to. The lens delivers sharpness that meets or exceeds my practical needs. If you need edge sharpness, you might want to do some more research.
Value: 10/10
Remember this is a $1,999 200mm f/2 lens. If Nikon released an equivalent native Z-mount version, it would almost certainly be a $6,000+ lens. The excellent Sigma alternative (not available for Nikon, unfortunately) costs $3,299.
For most people, this won’t be a primary lens—it’s more like a 3-iron in golf: a specialist tool that’s very nice to have. At this price, I think it’s an outstanding value. Time will tell how it holds up long-term, but I’m very pleased with the purchase. If you’re considering one, I’d strongly encourage renting it and seeing how it fits your workflow.
I'll try to add some pictures later,
Edited on Dec 31, 2025 at 09:02 AM · View previous versions
|
