Danpbphoto wrote:
Thank you "hdm"! I have found that out after re-reviewing a YT video on the 100s ii. Yes the "distraction" is more annoying than the actual setting.
I just need to get off my butt and get into the field to work around this. It has been just waaaayyyy to hot and humid and that lessens the "adventure" trying to work through the issue and fixing it.
THANKS!
Dan
Sure thing. It's the same distraction we had shooting film when we wanted to blow out a sunlit background for a high-key portrait, and the meter in the viewfinder would be telling us our exposure was way off
Danpbphoto wrote:
I have 2 5DSR's and I love them. I shoot Av. No problems at all adjusting any setting I want to. Everything is very straight forward! I shoot 100% raw and leave all the "adjustments" to ACR/Br....works for me.
Dan
Mine keeps plugging along, doing what it has always done, namely produce good high resolution images of the subjects I shoot. I always shoot in full manual mode (including MF) for landscapes, but I use aV for things like wildlife.
Your Canon's or Fuji or both Dan?
My Canon's do also Dan. The Fuji is a great camera but the technology is ahead of me.
Nature of the "beast". I am trying to "live with it".
"Improvise, adapt, overcome" my military motto follows me..
Thanks!
Dan
Danpbphoto wrote:
Your Canon's or Fuji or both Dan?
…n
I was referring to my 5DsR.
I continue to use it because it is still a good camera that produces good results and because I have a full set of lenses for it that I like.
But also continue to use it because, given Canon’s move from the EF to the RF mount system, any upgrade will likely lead to replacing all or almost all of my lenses. (I know about adapters, but I’m not a fan. That’s the short story, though there’s more to it than that.)
For two decades I have stuck with the Canon system since the occasional arguable advantages of other systems did not warrant the expense and re-learning that a system switch would entail. But now that sticking with Canon going forward will lead to similar changes it seems like a good time to be open to other alternatives when I do finally upgrade. That could be Fujifilm GFX (though that looks less likely now than in the past) or, more likely, to Sony.
Such a major change isn’t something I’ll rush into, so I continue to work with the gear I have as I ponder and compare.
My Fujifilm camera is relatively recent, the XT5, so I’m not contemplating any changes there.
I continue to use it because it is still a good camera that produces good results and because I have a full set of lenses for it that I like.
But also continue to use it because, given Canon’s move from the EF to the RF mount system, any upgrade will likely lead to replacing all or almost all of my lenses. (I know about adapters, but I’m not a fan. That’s the short story, though there’s more to it than that.)
For two decades I have stuck with the Canon system since the occasional arguable advantages of other systems did not warrant the expense and re-learning that a system switch would entail. But now that sticking with Canon going forward will lead to similar changes it seems like a good time to be open to other alternatives when I do finally upgrade. That could be Fujifilm GFX (though that looks less likely now than in the past) or, more likely, to Sony.
Such a major change isn’t something I’ll rush into, so I continue to work with the gear I have as I ponder and compare.
My Fujifilm camera is relatively recent, the XT5, so I’m not contemplating any changes there....Show more →
Darn fine camera Dan!
I am not so sure using an adapter "buys" me much other than frustration. I will be sticking with GF lenses.
Good to hear your "adventures" Dan!
Dan2
