p.9 #1 · Why am I using the X-Pro3 more than the a7cR????
Jack81 wrote:
.
You certainly made a point here :-)
But it seems like a good reason to update on my original post: Ever since I got the X-E5, the X-Pro3 has taken a back seat. The X-E5 provides me with all I need a smaller and more capable package.
p.9 #2 · Why am I using the X-Pro3 more than the a7cR????
Nielk Mike wrote:
You certainly made a point here :-)
But it seems like a good reason to update on my original post: Ever since I got the X-E5, the X-Pro3 has taken a back seat. The X-E5 provides me with all I need a smaller and more capable package.
They've made the same 'point' in several year-old threads across a number of boards. I guess they're trying to pad their post count? But oddly done by resurrecting old threads.
p.9 #3 · Why am I using the X-Pro3 more than the a7cR????
Nielk Mike wrote:
Ever since I got the X-E5, the X-Pro3 has taken a back seat. The X-E5 provides me with all I need a smaller and more capable package.
It's the most fun and inspiring camera I've ever had. Especially with my CV kit of the 23/1.2, 27/2, 35/1.2, 50/1.2 and soon the VM 75/2.8 I have incoming. I even use the film sim dial, but only to visualize, for inspiration and/or reference. Always end up using the raws in the end.
But your original point of this post is kind of why I remain a two system user. Also because of shooting a lot of personal stuff in combination with professional work. The Sony kit has its place too.
p.9 #4 · Why am I using the X-Pro3 more than the a7cR????
I made the same photo with a Mamiya 645 Pro with Ilford HP5 and the Fuji X100F Acros+Yellow profile edited in lightroom and they are almost indistinguishable. Fuji really is on to something great with the look of the photos if they are edited versions of the film simulations in my experience.
