fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?

  
 
jaggedhorizon
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


I travel too often with too many lenses (it used to be 16-35, 24-105 and 100-400, now I whittled it down to 16-35 GM2+70-200 GM2 but then I end up adding a CV 10 and the GM 35 1.4, which I love for family photos, and the 28/2 for street, so it grows again).

For a family trip to Colombia this summer, and future travels, I'm considering a prime kit (not just for weight and size, also because I think smaller lenses may attract less unwanted attention... though we won't be in cities too much). Lots of my landscape work is done on travels so I do want good lenses for that.

I'm looking here at the long end, which should work for landscapes (including cropping in 1.5x - 2x with my A7R5), portraits, etc. I was debating between the Samyang 75 1.8 (small, light, good optical quality, pretty cheap), TT Artisan 75 2.0 (small-ish, light, very cheap, also good optical quality), Sigma 90 2.8 (smallest, light, great optical quality and short MFD but only 2.8 and rather more expensive).

But now I found this Cine lens - Samyang 100 T2.3, which in principle gets the best of everything (longest FL, bright, still pretty small, faster than the Sigma, good optical quality, shorter MFD than the 75s though longer than the Sigma, and cheaper than the Sigma currently).

Has anyone had any experience with it for photos? There are only a few reviews out there.

If you're interested what other primes I'd get...it's a tough decision. I already have the 28/2, the 35/1.4 GM, a Viltrox 28 4.5 for street, a Viltrox Air 50/2. If going all prime I could also consider adding the Sony 16 1.8 (since it would double up for nightscapes)... but will I really be able to leave at home my beloved 16-35 GM2?

Alternatively, a kit could be: street and city: minimal 28/2 and 90/2.8, landscape: 16-35 GM2, Viltrox 50/2 and the 90/2.8 (or 100/T2.3).

It's a tough one. I like zooms for landscapes/ cityscapes / nightscapes, but not for street photography and family photos. So I end up carrying both zooms and primes. Do I really need a short prime tele?



Jul 04, 2025 at 05:21 PM
freaklikeme
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


I've used both the 75 T1.9 and 100 T2.3 for video and stills. I can highly recommend the 100 as a general shooting lens with a couple of caveats. Because the front of the lens is meant to interface with their MF gear or a matte box, there's no hood for it, and there are times it needs it. You can use a screw-in hood, but that makes the lens longer than necessary. My recommendation is to get used to hand shading when necessary. Second is you will want to download Samyang's Lens Manager to adjust the lens' AF performance to stills standards (Mac and Windows available). Finally, I'm sure you've seen this in the reviews, but the aperture blades aren't rounded, so you will get shapely highlights stopped down.

Only you can answer if you really need it or not, but, at the current sale prices, I doubt you'll be terribly disappointed with it.



Jul 04, 2025 at 06:59 PM
maestrofilms
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


I've been waiting for a "photo" version marketed as an f2 in their Tiny series.

The 20mm also, although I love the Sony 20mm.



Jul 04, 2025 at 10:27 PM
serhan_
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


I am using it only for photo and I like it a lot. I was looking for 85mm for shorter mfd and it doesn't exist... Only Sigma 90mm 2.8 has shorter mfd other than bigger macro lenses or manual focus CV 75mm 1.9/Typoch 75mm 1.4... Other only other option is Sigma 56mm 1.4 on apsc with shorter mfd...

Samyang never released the photo version. I have not used the other lengths in cine to see if there is any color difference with cine and photo versions. Cine version build quality is higher though the size is also bigger... It is still very light weight and works great with A1 with no software updates...





Backlight on the second photo...



Jul 05, 2025 at 01:24 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

aCuria
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


16 + 35 + 65/85

or 24 + 50 + 100

35 + 100 seems like a big gap



Jul 05, 2025 at 01:30 PM
jaggedhorizon
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


serhan_ wrote:
I am using it only for photo and I like it a lot. I was looking for 85mm for shorter mfd and it doesn't exist... Only Sigma 90mm 2.8 has shorter mfd other than bigger macro lenses or manual focus CV 75mm 1.9/Typoch 75mm 1.4... Other only other option is Sigma 56mm 1.4 on apsc with shorter mfd...

Samyang never released the photo version. I have not used the other lengths in cine to see if there is any color difference with cine and photo versions. Cine version build quality is higher though the size is also bigger... It is
...Show more

Lovely shots!

The shorter MFD is definitely a plus for this lens in general...but even more so for the Sigma 90 2.8!

I'm starting to wonder whether I should go for the Sigma simply because it's the smallest, since I also have a Batis 85 1.8 (and may at some point buy a Sigma 85 1.4) for thinner DOF...




Jul 06, 2025 at 10:31 AM
serhan_
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Samyang 100 T 2.3 for photo?


Thanks!

For travel purposes, smaller is better. But then it is not give you much separation from your 85mm lenses..

In my Canon days, I was 85+135mm shooter. Than there was a portrait shooter with Canon 100mm f2 that had photos with a good pop, so I replaced both with 100mm option... With Sony, I bought the Batis 85mm as the first tele option released and A7R didn't have IBIS either... Now with 1.5x camera crop on FF, it is even easier to fill the gaps..

jaggedhorizon wrote:
Lovely shots!

The shorter MFD is definitely a plus for this lens in general...but even more so for the Sigma 90 2.8!

I'm starting to wonder whether I should go for the Sigma simply because it's the smallest, since I also have a Batis 85 1.8 (and may at some point buy a Sigma 85 1.4) for thinner DOF...






Jul 06, 2025 at 11:09 AM







FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account