p.2 #1 · The Canon RF 100-300 2.8 does Yellowstone
Great post very informative. I知 just working on setting up my R5 2 to pair with the 100-300 for a trip to Alaska in 2 weeks. As I have never been before I知 planning to pair it withe the RF 400 f2.8 just to make sure I知 covered.
p.2 #2 · The Canon RF 100-300 2.8 does Yellowstone
Dave_E wrote:
Great post very informative. I知 just working on setting up my R5 2 to pair with the 100-300 for a trip to Alaska in 2 weeks. As I have never been before I知 planning to pair it withe the RF 400 f2.8 just to make sure I知 covered.
I'll be curious to see which lens you used the most and after your trip, if you could only pick one for a trip like that, what would it be?
p.2 #3 · The Canon RF 100-300 2.8 does Yellowstone
alundeb wrote:
Not to be a downer or anything, but the rumored variable teleconverter has only shown credible drawings for a 1.4x/2x selectable type. The 1.0 thing and the continuous zoom thing are only in our dreams. That being said, the 100-300 would be a good candidate for use with such a TC, even.
Companies file design patents all the time with no intention of actually moving forward with it.
p.2 #5 · The Canon RF 100-300 2.8 does Yellowstone
Very nice capture!!
100-300 is my favorite lens so far and I would not replace it for that 200-500 F4.
I was hoping Canon had it with the internal 1.4x before it was announced.
