arbitrage Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
matth4ever wrote:
For any folks with the cam, I'd highly appreciate any thoughts on these questions re. the R5 II raw pre-capture implementation:
1) is it possible to customize the cam so that raw pre-capture can be easily turned on and off with the press of a single button ? (this is possible on the Sony A9 III and works great).
2) is there any drawback to having pre-capture on, other than the extra buffer/storage consumed ?
(As an example of such a drawback: on the Nikon Z9, aside from being jpg only, the pre-capture implementation requires you to specify both a pre-release burst duration (seconds) _and_ a post-release burst duration (seconds). The pre-capture limit makes sense. But I find the post-release limit non-intuitive in that the cam stops shooting after you hit the post-release burst limit. You need to release the shutter, and re-press it to keep shooting. Now, you can specify 'max' for the post-release burst limit, but the cam still stops shooting (guessing when some internal buffer limit is reached). So this implementation means you may miss shots if the action continues for a while. Eg. it may stop at just the wrong time.
The other thing on the Z9 that I find unfortunate is : If the shutter-release button is pressed halfway for more than about 30 seconds, pre-capture stops and needs to be resumed by lifting your finger from the shutter-release button and then pressing it halfway again. So, if the action starts at the 'wrong time' you may miss some of it No such behavior on the A9 III. You can just keep half-pressing until the action starts.
Hoping that different behaviors such as these, or others, do not exist in the R5 II pre-capture implementation.)
BTW, IMHO, the Sony A9 III implementation is close to perfect. Pre-capture can be pending indefinitely, and after it starts you can just keep shooting as you normally would without pre-capture on. Ie. once the buffer fills the frame rate slows somewhat to the card rate. If only the cam was 40 or 50 Mp.
...Show more →
A1II will give us what we want. 50MP, 40-60FPS, A9III's method of pre-capture.
I agree, the A9III implementation is close to perfect...I'd argue even perfect as I can't think of a way to make it better.
I didn't realize the Z9 requires a re-press after 30s....I guess 30s is long enough a lot of the time to not be a big deal but I don't see why they need it to do that unless there are heat concerns. The A9III does warn that heat limitations can arise if you hold it down too long.
Hopefully the R5II allows a continuous press that just continues to delete the oldest file from memory as it adds the next one at the 15s mark. A continuous loop like the A9III.
|