Q111H Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Jonas B wrote:
From an image quality point of view everything is very much the same between the 50/1.2 and the 50/1.4.
In a controlled studie the faster lens has more background blur. In real life it is very much the same.
The 50/1.4 has perhaps a little less CA (both LoCA and LaCA) and it is a tad sharper. In real life these differences don't matter as they are small.
What matters is the price difference, and in the long run, the weight difference. I bought the 50/1.4 GM, it was an easy choice. The above is my conclusion after having watched a dozen Youtube vices and read as many reviews.
You can, of course, find comments like "the 50/1.2 images are x" where the x is replaced with magical words like golden, art, esotheric, best and, well, magical. You can safely disregard all those comments (my opinion). My guess is that you have to explain to yourself why you own a very expensive 700+ grams beast when the 50/1.4 option is there.
Then again, you know what opinions are worth. It's always better doing your own research instead of trusting random posters. ...Show more →
Yeah, the size is definitely a factor for me as the 1.2 would weigh more than my 24–70 GM ii. And I have watched tons of videos on the lens but sometimes it’s good to hear directly from someone with real life experience even if they are a stranger it does look like a pretty awesome little lens and most likely will be what I go with. It sounds like you’re pretty fond of the lens so that’s encouraging.
|