fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2023 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?

  
 
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


Hi, I'm relatively new to using flash. I've only shot with strobes two or three times, and I've always rented in the past. I have the potential to move up from a hobbyist to semi-pro doing action and sports photography for a few local teams, so I'm thinking of investing in my own flashes.

I've been eyeing the Wescott backpack kit, since I like that it's an all-in-one solution, but I'm concerned about having enough power in harsh sunlight. Has anyone use these for action portraits and sports? Any trouble with the power output? Is it smarter to wait until the Godox 600pro go back in stock, or are these sufficient? They would be more than enough for studio work, but I'm nervous about making an investment and discovering that they won't cut it for sports.

Thanks in advance for the help!

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1729000-REG/westcott_4713m_fj400_strobe_2_light_backpack.html




Mar 28, 2023 at 04:14 PM
rico
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


400Ws may or may not be adequate, action/sports being a broad category. Do you have a sample image?


Mar 28, 2023 at 07:49 PM
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?




rico wrote:
400Ws may or may not be adequate, action/sports being a broad category. Do you have a sample image?


Most of what I've done is jumping, diving into base, pitching/catching, and so on. I do have a few images from last season that I can share, but I'm not sure if I formatted the links correctly. I don't embed photos often.

280A0066

280A0035



Mar 28, 2023 at 08:35 PM
story_teller
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


It depends upon how close you can get the light. The examples you show would be fine for 400Ws lights.

Attached is an example with a 500Ws light.





HSS - 1/4000 f2.8 at ISO 100 Light at about 4ft away with beauty dish.




Mar 28, 2023 at 09:24 PM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


A big factor is the type of modifier used with the strobe. For example, at one extreme, there are 'sports' reflectors available from some brands that throw a narrow, highly concentrated beam of light compared to the much wider spread of standard reflectors. With those you can get away with lower power output. But they are hard light sources. If you want broad, soft light quality, you will need more power from a strobe (than if using highly focused reflectors) if shooting in direct midday sunlight using HSS. One option could be something like the Paul C Buff PLM umbrellas. They're true parabolic and are very efficient. For what you're doing, outside, the 51" would be fine and the biggest challenge would be dealing with wind. I have the larger ones 64" and 86" and use them with 400Ws strobes to throw light really far (like 50' when doing indoor events) and the strobes are usually at only around 100Ws (though at high ISOs).

BTW, going from 400Ws to 600 only gains half a stop.

What did you rent previously and was it just enough power, or more than enough? This should give you some idea whether or not you can get by with 400Ws.


Edited on Mar 28, 2023 at 09:52 PM · View previous versions



Mar 28, 2023 at 09:47 PM
kaplah
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


WaterfallJumper wrote:
I do have a few images from last season that I can share, but I'm not sure if I formatted the links correctly. I don't embed photos often.

If you don't mind hard light, you could do those with a speedlight.

So yes, 400ws would be enough, all else being equal.

The further back you go and the bigger / less efficient the modifier, the more light you'll need.

But there's no need to really guess.
- you've pushed ambient down about two stops, give or take. Maybe three, but let's say two.
- sunny-16 at 1/200s says your flash would need to do f/22 at iso 100 on the subject. But they aren't in the sun, I'm thinking modestly overcast, for about two stops below that, so your flash needs to do f/11.

From there all you need is the guide number of the flash system / modifier that you'll be using, and you'll know how far back you can be.

For example:
https://www.paulcbuff.com/Light-Modifiers/Reflectors/24-Silver-Foldable-Beauty-Dish.html (320ws f/11 at about 10 feet)
or
https://www.paulcbuff.com/Light-Modifiers/Reflectors/8-5-High-Output-Reflector.html (320ws f/11 at about 15 feet)

and scroll down to the "expected output" table(s).

If your preferred modifier manufacturers don't supply output numbers / guide numbers you're back to guessing. And ws isn't a perfect guide to output, it's just the input.







Mar 28, 2023 at 09:48 PM
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?




rscheffler wrote:
A big factor is the type of modifier used with the strobe. For example, at one extreme, there are 'sports' reflectors available from some brands that throw a narrow, highly concentrated beam of light compared to the much wider spread of standard reflectors. With those you can get away with lower power output. But they are hard light sources. If you want broad, soft light quality, you will need more power from a strobe (than if using highly focused reflectors) if shooting in direct midday sunlight using HSS. One option could be something like the Paul C Buff PLM umbrellas.
...Show more

Great suggestions! Thank you. I'm very new to all of this and don't know any photographers in person who do this style, so I've been floundering. I know I have a long way to go, so I deeply appreciate all the guidance. I didn't realize it's only half a stop going to 600w. That sets my mind at ease; I can just move the light a little closer or bump my settings.

I used the profoto B10x Plus (I'd planned to rent the kit I'm looking at buying, but the rental company made a mistake and couldn't fill the order, so they upgraded me for free). Now that I'm looking at them again, I see that they're 500Ws! This entire time I've been working under the impression that they were 600w for some reason. I thought they were barely enough, but that was also 1) because I was back quite a ways, and 2) they wanted this dramatic, moody style despite one of the brightest days I've seen all year. I'm starting to think that I should just get the 400s and not worry about it.



Mar 29, 2023 at 06:07 AM
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?




story_teller wrote:
It depends upon how close you can get the light. The examples you show would be fine for 400Ws lights.

Attached is an example with a 500Ws light.


That's extremely helpful to see a comparison. I think I was just set up too far back for how harsh the sunlight was that day. I'll dial it in with practice. Rookie mistake!



Mar 29, 2023 at 06:09 AM
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?




kaplah wrote:
If you don't mind hard light, you could do those with a speedlight.

So yes, 400ws would be enough, all else being equal.

The further back you go and the bigger / less efficient the modifier, the more light you'll need.

But there's no need to really guess.
- you've pushed ambient down about two stops, give or take. Maybe three, but let's say two.
- sunny-16 at 1/200s says your flash would need to do f/22 at iso 100 on the subject. But they aren't in the sun, I'm thinking modestly overcast, for about two stops below that, so your flash needs to do
...Show more

Thank you, that's a ton of useful information. I can definitely see how to apply this next time. It was an extremely bright day, and they wanted a dark and dramatic background, so even with HSS I was struggling a lot with light. I think with better placement and a more effective modifier than the tiny umbrella, I'd have been better situated for success. Thanks very much for explaining it in such exact terms; that speaks to the science nerd in me!

You've helped settle my concerns. Time to buy!



Mar 29, 2023 at 06:16 AM
Conner999
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


As with anything wrt lighting outdoors, "It depends".

Assuming your using a 35mm/APS-C camera and HSS vs. a leaf shutter system (where this is not an issue), the moment you go above your sync speed into HSS mode, you lose anywhere from 1.5 - 2 stops +/- of effective output. In short, go above sync speed and you cut the effective Ws output of your strobe,, as seen by your camera, in half - at least. You will also chew through the battery much faster and need to reduce the pace to avoid overheating.

Add diffusion, distance, smaller apertures, faster SS and the power penalty gets worse.
Add high performance reflectors, cut the distance, go wider apertures, drop speeds and the penalty, while there, is reduced.

The safe rule w/HSS is, in order to have the widest possible envelope to be able to work in (after accepting there will be one), to go with the largest capacity pack/strobe you can afford to buy and are willing to carry around.




Mar 29, 2023 at 09:25 AM
jeffbuzz
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


WaterfallJumper wrote:
Most of what I've done is jumping, diving into base, pitching/catching, and so on. I do have a few images from last season that I can share, but I'm not sure if I formatted the links correctly. I don't embed photos often.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52778472719_01642a5bda_b.jpg280A0066

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52777687582_2944df7004_b.jpg280A0035


Clearly these were posed (i.e. choreographed) shots. You did not shoot from these locations during actual games. (Right?) So by "action" you're working more in the "sports portraits" genre, not "sports action" or actual game play images. If this is true, you can work with lights close enough to your subjects so 400ws will work in most scenarios.

Were your examples shot in daylight using HSS to darken the background? HSS uses much more power than standard sync. As others noted, your modifier will really determine how much power and how close you need to place the light(s). Focused reflectors might be a better solution.



Mar 29, 2023 at 10:07 AM
Mal Paso
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


I bought the Westcott FJ400 2 light backpack kit with the FJ-X3 transmitter this year when B&H had a sale. The strobes take Bowens light modifiers so there are a lot of choices. What's really nice on the new strobes is the ability to adjust power levels, compensation, TTL or manual, or switch which strobes fire all from the camera. If you can position strobes before the event you don't have to go near them to change settings.


Mar 29, 2023 at 11:10 AM
kaplah
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


WaterfallJumper wrote:
and they wanted a dark and dramatic background, so even with HSS I was struggling a lot with light.
[...]
Thanks very much for explaining it in such exact terms; that speaks to the science nerd in me!
[...]
You've helped settle my concerns. Time to buy!


1) Lightbulb moment for you, perhaps; HSS has about half the range of regular flash. So if you have a range issue (same as a power issue, just expressed differently), and want to use more-open apertures (e.g., f/8, f/4), you could consider ND filters to get yourself back into x-sync shutter range. Here is my boilerplate for ND vs. HSS:

"
HSS works, but is much less efficient than ND filters because some or most of the flash is wasted on the shutter curtains, not getting to the sensor - so the flash needs to be a lot closer, sometimes too close, to the subject. With ND's, one simply sets the camera to x-sync, sets the flash to "beat the sun" if that is what is desired, then shoots.

A misconception is that the ND makes it harder to beat the sun because it reduces flash. It reduces flash and ambient at the same time, so as long as one can get the flash overpowering the sun at, say, f/11, sticking on an ND just means opening up the aperture to compensate.

A link that goes through the HSS inefficiency: http://betterfamilyphotos.blogspot.ca/2010/05/improving-flash-efficiency-with-nd.html , and another: http://neilvn.com/tangents/high-speed-flash-sync/

I can "beat the sun" with a single bare SB-900, but would more typically use two so they aren't working as hard, have longer range, and recycle more quickly.

My DSLR gear - fast lenses and bright viewfinders - is perfectly usable with five stops of filters. Consumer gear, with slow lenses (but then, one can't use more than 2 or so stops with a 5.6 lens) and dimmer viewfinders, might not be. Five stops is as much as I ever use. With MILC cameras, composing is unaffected by ND filters - MILC cameras just brighten up the EVF.

I suppose that, when shooting at f/1.4 in bright sun with flash as the key and ambient under-exposed, HSS or HyperSync would be helpful. Let's do the sunny 16 math: under-exposing ambient means about f/22; using ISO50 (works on my gear) gets us back to f/16; using x-sync of 1/200 gets us back to f/11. Five stops down is f/2. So yes, I'd need hypersync or hss or a shaded shooting area for f/1.4 (or could go with six stops). Otherwise, NDs would be fine and much more efficient for flash - although it's worth acknowledging than many people prefer HSS because it frees them from filters and brightens up their viewfinder, which is absolutely fine by me. Some prefer HSS because they think high shutter speeds freeze motion - which is a whole 'nuther discussion.

Using HSS does remove the need to purchase ND filters, but you may have them anyway and HSS flashes can cost more than non-HSS flashes.
"

2) glad to hear that science is helpful!

3) isn't it always that time?



Mar 29, 2023 at 11:56 AM
macwest
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


A good guy to follow alot of good information, https://www.youtube.com/@QuantzPhoto/videos



Mar 29, 2023 at 01:13 PM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


rscheffler wrote:
A big factor is the type of modifier used with the strobe. For example, at one extreme, there are 'sports' reflectors available from some brands that throw a narrow, highly concentrated beam of light compared to the much wider spread of standard reflectors. With those you can get away with lower power output. But they are hard light sources. If you want broad, soft light quality, you will need more power from a strobe (than if using highly focused reflectors) if shooting in direct midday sunlight using HSS. One option could be something like the Paul C Buff PLM umbrellas.
...Show more
WaterfallJumper wrote:
Great suggestions! Thank you. I'm very new to all of this and don't know any photographers in person who do this style, so I've been floundering. I know I have a long way to go, so I deeply appreciate all the guidance. I didn't realize it's only half a stop going to 600w. That sets my mind at ease; I can just move the light a little closer or bump my settings.

I used the profoto B10x Plus (I'd planned to rent the kit I'm looking at buying, but the rental company made a mistake and couldn't fill the order, so
...Show more

kaplah made some good points to consider and brought some more to mind:

HSS does have a power penalty as he described and since you're using an R6 (mirrorless), using ND filters on the lens might be an option towards maximizing light output/use. The question is how many of your shots will be static poses versus with motion (such as the one diving into base)?

It helps that strobe exposure tends to 'freeze' subject motion, but it's not quite as simple as that, and is complicated by the amount of ambient light you wish to retain in the images. Even if the strobe is able to freeze the motion, if you're working at 1/250 max normal flash sync speed, if there is enough ambient light, you can get 'ghosting' (somewhat of a double image), which is the ambient light visibly mixing with your flash exposure.

Strobes have what's know as flash duration times, which is effectively their 'freezing power' and can be thought of similarly to camera shutter speed settings. For example the Westcott FJ400 has a t.1 flash duration (t.1 is a better indicator of 'freezing power' than the t.5 measurement) of only 1/280 at full power. That's barely better than the camera's flash sync speed. Generally, for freezing ambient light sports action (without a strobe), you want 1/1000 and higher. The same is true with strobes. And ideally as high as you can get. Unfortunately this is common with pretty much all 'budget' strobes - flash duration at full power will generally only be slightly faster than the camera's flash sync speed. To considerably improve on this you have to spend a lot more money, such as on a Profoto D2 or bi-tube or quad-tube heads for pack systems (though the $520 Buff Einstein 640Ws unit (not battery powered and not HSS capable) is respectable at ~1/600).

IMO, this is a reason so many value HSS - it allows you to 'cheat' with 'cheap' strobe systems. Their full power flash duration sucks, but you can use the mechanical shutter of the camera at a traditionally high sports shutter speed to eliminate ambient light ghosting and cheat the strobe exposure by making the strobe basically a continuous light source for 1/200 (roughly the time it takes the mechanical shutter to transition the sensor area). The tradeoff is less efficient use of maximum light output. You may come across another 'cheat' called hypersync (or HS), which is a different approach to the same end result. HS is apparently somewhat more efficient, but comes with its own tradeoffs, such as less even across-frame exposure.

One of the good things about so many of the recent inexpensive strobes, such as the FJ400, Godox, the new Paul C Buff Celestial, is that they use IGBT control of flash power, which basically means, as the flash power is reduced, the flash duration shortens. This is good if you want to freeze action. With the FJ400 in action mode and minimum power output, you're now at a t.1 time of 1/7000. So probably somewhere around 1/3 or 1/4 power it's already at a pretty good t.1 time at or shorter than 1/1000. But can you get away with 100Ws in full sunlight? As already discussed, it will really depend on how close you can position the lights, in addition to the modifiers used. If you don't want the hard light look from a reflector, then you'll probably have to consider some sort of beauty dish, or as I previously suggested, an efficient parabolic umbrella like the PLM from Buff (be warned that there are a lot of "parabolic" modifiers on the market, but many are not truly parabolic).

And since you're shopping around for strobe options, you might want to look into the new Paul C Buff Celestial, which is 500Ws and apparently outputs similar usable light to the Godox 600Ws unit (see the Celestial thread on this board). It also appears to be somewhat smaller than the FJ400. Tradeoffs with the Celestial seem to be the need for the $200 Hub controller if you want HSS and/or TTL control and the use of the Balcar light modifier mount, which is much less common than the Bowens mount used by the FJ400 and Godox units. But Buff has a pretty good range of modifiers and when looking at many 3rd party soft box options, many also offer the Balcar adapter ring.

Something else to consider, that was briefly mentioned above, is if working outside in direct sun, in the summer, on warm/hot days, and using the strobes at or near full power with rapid shooting, you're likely to run into thermal throttling situations. Either the strobe will significantly increase recycling time once its internal temperature reaches a certain level, or it will require a shutdown period.

Buff's 11" long throw reflector: https://www.paulcbuff.com/Light-Modifiers/Reflectors/11-Long-Throw-Reflector.html

Note, with that reflector's 28 degree angle of illumination, to light a 5' tall person head to toe would mean positioning the light 10' away. Based on their specs, their 160Ws units (DB400/B400) and this reflector will give f/16 and 6/10 (ISO 100) at that distance. That would be enough to overpower direct sunlight.

For more info about flash duration:

https://www.paulcbuff.com/Flash-Duration



Mar 29, 2023 at 03:36 PM
tcphoto
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


As with most projects, take more power than what you think is needed. How much power do you actually need, how fast will the unit need to recycle, what distance will you place it relative to the subject, what modifiers will you use and do you have a backup if the unit fails? I love my old Profoto Compact 300ws unit but I have a b600 that I'd use for such projects or better yet the Acute2 1200ws if I'm shooting for an extended period of time.


Mar 29, 2023 at 04:09 PM
Mal Paso
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


I just looked up current Profoto. Where is Profoto made that they charge $17,500 for a 2400 WS power pack?

There is a 4,000 WS Norman complete with head sitting in California for $330. He says local pickup but I'll bet he'd ship for the right price. 1/240s at full power dropping to 1/1200s, stepless. No radio but for $17,000 you can add one and hire an assistant.



Mar 29, 2023 at 06:05 PM
johnvanr
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


Mal Paso wrote:
I just looked up current Profoto. Where is Profoto made that they charge $17,500 for a 2400 WS power pack?

There is a 4,000 WS Norman complete with head sitting in California for $330. He says local pickup but I'll bet he'd ship for the right price. 1/240s at full power dropping to 1/1200s, stepless. No radio but for $17,000 you can add one and hire an assistant.


Made in Sweden, just like Hasselblad. The top lighting brands are all crazy expensive, but they’re the choice of rental studios and pros who need reliability and color consistency. The demands of a catalogue shoot are quite different from a model shoot once in a while.



Mar 29, 2023 at 07:13 PM
rscheffler
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?


Mal Paso wrote:
I just looked up current Profoto. Where is Profoto made that they charge $17,500 for a 2400 WS power pack?

There is a 4,000 WS Norman complete with head sitting in California for $330. He says local pickup but I'll bet he'd ship for the right price. 1/240s at full power dropping to 1/1200s, stepless. No radio but for $17,000 you can add one and hire an assistant.

johnvanr wrote:
Made in Sweden, just like Hasselblad. The top lighting brands are all crazy expensive, but they’re the choice of rental studios and pros who need reliability and color consistency. The demands of a catalogue shoot are quite different from a model shoot once in a while.


I'll add it's probably also a consequence of the loss of the lower end of the market to recent entrants (Godox and the likes). And just the overall shift to less need for powerful packs. Less competition in that rarified space - who else still makes 2400Ws+ 'premium' pack and head systems? There's also Broncolor. Speedotron, still exists at a more entry level price point, though looks like nothing has changed in 30 years. There's also Hensel with a 2400Ws pack for $3K. In fact, Godox now makes a 2400Ws pack... $5K for the pack, $6.2K with two heads, further eroding the premium position held by Profoto, etc. Volume goes down, prices go up. When you need it (Profoto), you'll rent it instead of owning it.



Mar 29, 2023 at 11:29 PM
WaterfallJumper
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Is 400w enough for outdoor action?




rscheffler wrote:
kaplah made some good points to consider and brought some more to mind:

HSS does have a power penalty as he described and since you're using an R6 (mirrorless), using ND filters on the lens might be an option towards maximizing light output/use. The question is how many of your shots will be static poses versus with motion (such as the one diving into base)?

It helps that strobe exposure tends to 'freeze' subject motion, but it's not quite as simple as that, and is complicated by the amount of ambient light you wish to retain in the images. Even if
...Show more

Wow, valuable stuff. I appreciate all the details. Between your posts and several of the other excellent suggestions in this thread, I've got a lot of information to chew on. I'll try to keep it all in mind, and I definitely plan to practice on my kids before I have another shoot. Always something to learn! Thanks again for your time, everyone.



Mar 30, 2023 at 09:08 AM
       2       end




FM Forums | Lighting & Studio Techniques | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account