fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Fuji Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2023 · A way to think about Subject Detection

  
 
morris
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · A way to think about Subject Detection


I've owned the X-H2s for about 9 months and until the other day I never had a clear view of the interaction between Subject Detection and traditional Fuji AF. Having reviewed many photos submitted by people having issues and comparing their photos and settings to mine I came to the below idea that might be what happens or simply a way to think about what is going on.

When we start focus the camera uses the traditional AF system. The Subject Detection system is looking for a subject. As soon as Subject Detection finds the subject it moves the focus selection area as if the photographer had moved the joystick to the subject. This is all that Subject Detection does, it does not focus the camera as the traditional Fuji AF system focuses the camera. This is why the custom AF settings still matter. Further more, our choice of AF type becomes critical to proper focus. As you know, I love Zone Focus yet it has its down sides. There are times when the subject is in a busy environment and when spot is a much better choice. Switching to spot in situations where zone or wide fail is likely to produce great results using Subject Detection just as spot does when we move the joystick using traditional AF.

Morris

Ps. If you drop the shutter before the camera has focus you will get a blurry photo. This is the primary reason I miss.

Pps. My X-H2s is expecting!



Mar 23, 2023 at 11:27 AM
SamuraiDog
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · A way to think about Subject Detection


Hi Morris. This is an interesting subject that I'd like to further understand. I don't quite follow the difference. If you drop the shutter, does this still happen if you have your settings to "Focus" instead of "Release"?


Mar 23, 2023 at 02:55 PM
morris
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · A way to think about Subject Detection


SamuraiDog wrote:
Hi Morris. This is an interesting subject that I'd like to further understand. I don't quite follow the difference. If you drop the shutter, does this still happen if you have your settings to "Focus" instead of "Release"?


The Ps. about dropping the shutter when not in focus is not directly related to subject detection. Sometimes Fuji's AF system is confused and thinks it has focus. Because of this, even if focus/release is set to focus, the camera will sometimes though rarely take a blurry photo.

Morris



Mar 23, 2023 at 04:25 PM
photonwalk
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · A way to think about Subject Detection


> Ps. If you drop the shutter before the camera has focus you will get a blurry photo. This is the primary reason I miss.

I believe this is actually an option you can toggle. Look for "Focus Release Priority" under the Shooting menu. It is configurable for AF-S and AF-C separately.



Apr 06, 2023 at 09:44 AM
morris
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · A way to think about Subject Detection


photonwalk wrote:
> Ps. If you drop the shutter before the camera has focus you will get a blurry photo. This is the primary reason I miss.

I believe this is actually an option you can toggle. Look for "Focus Release Priority" under the Shooting menu. It is configurable for AF-S and AF-C separately.


Yes it is and then you don't have control of when you take a photo. It will slow the burst rate. And then there is the odd times when Fuji cameras think they are in focus when they are not. They will even track an out of focus subject and this behavior is very strange and happens about 1 in 1000 focus attempts.

Morris



Apr 06, 2023 at 11:18 AM
Deuxieme
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · A way to think about Subject Detection


I have found the X-T5 focus behavior strange as well. The X-T3 I used to use was not great at CAF, but it was predictable with its flaws, so I could work around them.

The X-T5 feels very erratic, and even under controlled conditions, I can't seem to figure out why it can be for unreliable and twitchy, yet sometimes perform perfectly well. Overall I have more sharp, properly focused images, but it always feels like it's not up to me to determine.



Apr 06, 2023 at 02:13 PM
MichaelACG
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · A way to think about Subject Detection


morris wrote:
...
When we start focus the camera uses the traditional AF system. The Subject Detection system is looking for a subject. As soon as Subject Detection finds the subject it moves the focus selection area as if the photographer had moved the joystick to the subject. This is all that Subject Detection does, it does not focus the camera as the traditional Fuji AF system focuses the camera.
...


Thank you, Morris.

This was the explanation, helping me to understand, why and what went wrong in my bird detection attempts:
I thought that the small rectangle(s), showing that and where a bird (bird's eye) is detected by the bird detection, additionally reduce the focus area. This was a wrong assumption and Morris' explanation helped me to understand, what bird detection can do and what not.

Birds are really another challenge to focus, much more difficult than the other objects: smaller, erratically (and fast) moving, sometimes uneven background. And long lenses - making DOF and movements even more critical.

Morris' explanation is not in Fuji's manual (so - in a sense, we all are kind of doing a dis-assembling exercise ;-), but it can be easily proven. In the following examples the focus area was in the middle, and bird detection moved it onto the bird:

1. Blackbird on the ground:
You see the 3 white rectangles: 1: bird, 2: head, 3:eye. So bird detection worked perfectly.
You see the red focus zone (the circle indicates "zone"), it was a 7x7 zone.
And this 7x7 was my mistake: way too large, so rightfully the focus was somewhere, not on the bird.


2. My bird model on a fence, background looks nicely blurred.
Again bird detection worked well, this time the focus point was moved onto the eye.
But ... I (intentionally) use the largest focus point (size 6), to illustrate that this sometime is also a problem (like zone).
The X-H2S focused to the fence, slightly (2 cm) behind the bird's feet. I had 600m focal length, f/8, 5 m distance, so only around 3 cm DOF. The backfocus of 2 cm was enough to blur the bird' head.


3. And here the solution for situations like this: Use the smallest focus point (size 1 in this case).


(First time that I try to link images here - I hope, it's working).

Finally after reading Morris' threads on bird detection, using his AF-C custom settings, many tests, a very fruitful (and nice :-) exchange of thoughts with him ... my go-to settings for birds are:



  1. Electronic shutter: very important
  2. AF-C: to follow both bird's movements and compensate my movements, when hand-holding. Remember: long lens!
  3. Try to keep the bird in the focus area. This is a tricky trade-off: Zone makes it easier than point, but you get the focus problems in busy backgrounds.
  4. As Morris always says: Try to have a nice background, do not shoot birds in busy backgrounds. But - often you don't have a choice.
  5. For (relatively) static birds, I use single-shot, and AF/MF=on with focus check and MF assist. Focus area as small as I manage to "catch" the bird, and MF override in critical situations. If the bird is really static, I even change to AF-S, because here the MF assist is a joy to use because of the automatic enlargement, when you touch the focus ring.
  6. BIF (birds in flight): multi-shot (I use 30 fps) and - important - AF/MF=off (otherwise the camera switches to Release Priority). I use focus zone, again as small as possible.
  7. In general: the smaller the focus zone the better detection works (and autofocus), but the more problems to follow the bird.
  8. And, aperture, ISO, time to properly expose and freeze the bird's movement.


Hmmm - embedding of linked images seems not to work.
... it works with BBCode (img tags) ... now question is, whether you like that the size is so large.

Edited on Apr 08, 2023 at 01:06 AM · View previous versions



Apr 07, 2023 at 03:58 PM
morris
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · A way to think about Subject Detection


Thank you for chiming in Michael. Those that pay attention to what you just wrote will see good improvements.

Morris



Apr 07, 2023 at 04:18 PM
MichaelACG
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · A way to think about Subject Detection


Thank you, Morris. I managed to embed, with the img-BBCode.

Re Bird Detection and Autofocus ...
... the longer I think on this, the more I think, it's either a coding error or a serious design flaw not to resize the autofocus area according to / down to the detection area.

I am wandering, whether this is also the case with (human) face/eye detection. Otherwise I would expect a wave of complaints on "Fuji is unreliable with eye detection".
Or are all people using the smallest (size 1) focus point when photographing humans?

Maybe I need to try this for birds, too. ?



Apr 08, 2023 at 02:58 AM
morris
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · A way to think about Subject Detection


MichaelACG wrote:
Thank you, Morris. I managed to embed, with the img-BBCode.

Re Bird Detection and Autofocus ...
... the longer I think on this, the more I think, it's either a coding error or a serious design flaw not to resize the autofocus area according to / down to the detection area.

I am wandering, whether this is also the case with (human) face/eye detection. Otherwise I would expect a wave of complaints on "Fuji is unreliable with eye detection".
Or are all people using the smallest (size 1) focus point when photographing humans?

Maybe I need to try this for birds, too. ?


That's interesting Michael. As we learn how this works, the photographer should chose the appropriate size zone or point for the task. When using face detection, I use a 3x3 zone and will sometimes stop down. Sometimes I do this without even looking in the finder or at the LCD just lifting my camera to the subjects face height. It's a great way to get natural expressions.

If Fuji were to change the size, or type, they need to do it temporarily. I say this because of the terrible behavior of there firmware in cases like a card one error when configured to write to card one and then overflow. They switch to card one and don't restore the card one setting.

Morris



Apr 08, 2023 at 07:04 AM
MichaelACG
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · A way to think about Subject Detection


Hi Morris.
Interesting, how you use the face/eye detection to get natural expressions. With what I learned - your stopping down is the key to get sharp images. Because, the object/face/eye detection is astonishing fast and reliable ... and the stopping down results in enough DOF that a slight mis-focus is not a problem.

And yes, of course the change in size must be temporarily. As the re-location today is also temporarily - the focus area starts always in the position, you located it to.



Apr 08, 2023 at 03:55 PM
MichaelACG
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · A way to think about Subject Detection


I just found an interesting video:



This guy proposes for BIB ("birds in bushes", nice analogy to BIF ) to use bird detection with
- Single Focus point
- AF-C with custom setting set 2 (tracking 3, speed 0, center)
- and 425 focus points, instead 117.

He thinks that the much smaller points are less prone to mal-focus on the background.
I will give it a try.

Remark: His BIF setting is a special setting for birds flying towards the camera. He recommends set 4 (0,1,front) and to turn bird detection off.



Apr 08, 2023 at 04:30 PM





FM Forums | Fuji Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account