YariloUA
Offline
•
Upload & Sell: Off
|
I've been shooting Nikon CCD from 2007. Started with D50 and switched to D200 in 2010 due to some ergonomical issues with D50. Tried to switch to D750 in 2017 for better low light capabilities and FF image size. Fantastic camera ergonomic-wise and makes great low light pictures, but I was shocked how bad it renders colors of the caucasian skin comparing to any Nikon CCD camera. Spent around a year trying to get them right, learned a lot of color correction stuff. Eventually I ended up buying Canon 5D Mark II that was substantially better in skin rendering department. And pictures from my D750 benefitted of that purchase too, since I've made some adjustments to PP of D750 files based on comparison with 5D-II. But the camera itself, the 5D MII, is really uncomfortable to use, even comparing to D200. Phase detect AF, for example, is pretty bad comparing to my Nikons, so I was forced to use extremely slow contrast AF in LV when shooting wide open. And the colors were still not quite good as they were on D200. So after another year of shooting 5DMII I bought a Fuji S5 pro as a last chance I gave to digital before trying film. Was shooting it around half a year and decided that I still need to try film. And that was a real game changer! Now I've got a real boost in color department. The only downside was low technical specs of 135 film. I tried it with Nikon F100 and Canon 1V cameras. I ended up buying Rolleicord Vb and for now I'm quite happy with it. It gave me enough technical quality while keeping fantastic colors of the film and a vintage look of the old German glass.
Kodak advertised, back in the days of film reign, that they provide a "pleasing rendition" of the colors in their films. And that is true. On a contrary, modern digital cameras and lenses provide "technically accurate" rendition and here lies the problem for me. With film all you need to do is to shoot a picture, process and scan/print and that's it, most of the color aesthetics is already there, baked in by film manufacturer. With digital, theoretically, you have endless possibilities in twisting colors to meet your taste, but only best of the best can manage to create something that can rival film rendition out of the modern digital.
That's why I still like to shoot my D200. Film isn't cheap nowadays, especially MF (and LF prices are crazily high  ) and D200 and S5 pro are cameras from the era when film still was a thing and camera's renditions were based somewhat on that "legacy" color science of "pleasing" rendition. Unfortunately, Nikon lost it's fantastic color science of the old "Modes" system when they decided to switch to "Picture control" system. The best proof of that - I can switch to "latest picture control" on my files from D200 in Nikon Studio and all the magic is gone, rendition is the same as on modern Nikon digital.
That's why, at least for me, both S5 pro and D200 are fantastic cameras even novadays. So if someone looking for "pleasing rendition", tired of modern "sterile" and "technically accurate" rendition they are the way to go in a low budget segment.
My preference from that pair (S5 pro and D200) is D200, but someone's could be S5 pro. D200 is closer to Kodak films in rendition, especially to Kodak Portra. I have some pair shots (D200 - Portra), that are almost the same in color rendition. S5 pro, obviously, is like Fuji films and also closer to Canon digital cameras look. Since I'm a huge fan of Kodak films and not so much of Fuji's and Canon's digital, I returned to my trusted D200. S5, hovever, have fantastic dynamic range because of it's Super CCD dual sensor, but it's about all obvious advantages it have to D200. D200, OTOH, compatible with latest version of modern software on both Mac and Win (try that with Fuji Hyper Utility! ), is more responsive, more comfortable to use. Have a slight resolution advantage (10MP vs 6MP). Costs less, S5 pro prices are crazy novadays. And you can buy D80 for even less with the same picture quality inside a smaller package, but with less refined ergonomics.
For my taste, the only digital "camera" that can surpass D200's rendition is Kodak Pro Back with Raw Photo Processor converter. But that is completely another beast cost- and size/weight- wise.
And here some of my recent shots on D200 and S5 pro:
Nikon D200 + AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G @ ƒ/2.0, 1/320, ISO100 (Nikon Studio + ACR)
D200_012177_NST by Yarilo, on Flickr
Fujifilm FinePix S5Pro + AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D @ ƒ/2.8, 1/1600, ISO100 (ACR with "Canon 1Ds Standard" profile)
FS5P_011021_ACR by Yarilo, on Flickr
|
This body is so agonizingly slow and clunky it forces you to slow down. Not really a bad thing. 
