Tonzah78 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.3 #14 · p.3 #14 · Sony 55mm Zeiss 1.8, Sony 50mm G 2.5, Sigma 65mm F2 - which is best? | |
I've used to own the Sony 55/1.8 ZA. It's a wonderful lens, despite the flaws (aberrations). No going wrong there. But as an owner of both the Voigtländer 40mm f/1.2 Nokton and Sigma 65mm I-series, I really don't miss it anymore. The Sigma 65mm beats it easily in just about every department. The 65mm has pretty much flawless IQ and nice rendering. Also more 3d pop (in my eyes at least). I also prefer having aperture ring in the lens and the handling is just the way I like it, including the MF operation. I'm also about to go to store to get my 35i as well, as I don't have an af 35mm at all atm. (Will not replace my Nokton.) The 35/65 Sigma combo just seems so tempting to me, when I want to go full on with af lenses. So most likely I will go with the 40mm Nokton when having only one lens, and 35/65 when having two.
In my use the 65mm has worked great for me as a really wonderful all-around lens when outdoors and I have room to zoom with my feet. Indoors, where it's more cramped, it's harder to get enough distance to fit everything in the frame. But even then it's an incredible detail/portrait lens. Easier to work with than 85mm indoors. Actually "feels" more like an 50mm than 85mm lens. I also have the 85mm DG DN Art, but it's somewhat bigger and different beast altogether. First I thought I would sell my 65mm when I got the 85mm, but the 65mm is such a special lens to me, I will keep both for sure.
And I also use the crop mode quite often, even on my A7III body. (Next body will be the A7IV most likely, but I'm in no hurry to upgrade.) These new Sigmas are so damned sharp, I can get pretty great images even with less amount of pixels. The crop mode in A7III is 3936 pixels on long edge which would allow me to print 13" tall image in 300dpi.
|