Fred Miranda Offline Admin Upload & Sell: On
|
LarsHP wrote:
Sometimes the reverse field curvature will beneficial, like the last one just above, where the point of focus is well outside the center on a close subject while the background is in the center, but generally that's not the case.
I have been on the lookout for an f/0.95 or f/1 50mm lens with smooth bokeh and proper sharpness in the mid-frame (at a sensible price, which excludes the Noctilux and Z Noct Nikkor) for the last several years, and really thought the Nokton f/1 would be THE lens. Before it was released, I said to myself that the only thing that possibly could make me _not_ buy it would be the "unlikely" case that Cosina Voigtländer designed the lens with reverse field curvature even on digital Leica M sensors. As we know now, this was unfortunately exactly the case, and I am really sorry the lens designers made this compromise.
If the lens had _regular_ field curvature, even a quite strong one, I would happily buy it, because that would counteract the effect that optical vignetting has on background blur towards the sides and corners. ...Show more →
Yes, depending on subject distance, the field curvature shape going the other way + strong optical vignetting makes rendering distracting and therefore this lens may not be for you and many others including myself. You mentioned the Leica 50/0.95 Noctilux perhaps being superior in this regard. It must be for $13K, right? 
Well, I just got one coming and should compare it to the Voigtlander 50/1 Nokton next week. Got a Leica 50/1 as well, to make these resolution and rendering comparisons more fair.
From your posts, it looks like your main priority is rendering evenness, so the Syoptic 50MM 1.1 reviewed by Bastian seems to be a great choice but the compromise will be craftsmanship and lower resolution/contrast at any distance.
I'm afraid that a well-built and compact 50mm f/1 lens with "optimal" field curvature, low optical vignetting and sharp at any distance does not exist at any price...
|