p.5 #1 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
I just did some testing with my 100-400 on a Z6 (not II).
* My 100-400 would let me choose "auto" and "EFCS", but not "mechanical" shutter
* My 500PF allows me to choose all three shutter options
* The 100-400 when set to auto audibly uses a full mechanical shutter from 1/8000 down to 1/320
* The 100-400 when set to auto audibly uses EFCS at 1/250 and slower
My crude sharpness test was inconclusive between my 100-400, 100-400+1.4x, and 500PF. The differences were largely in favor of the 500PF but differences minor, and I didn't fire enough frames to conclusively say one is better than another (nor would I make such a statement unless I were shooting on a tripod).
That said, "the 500PF is a little sharper" mirrors my limited real-world shooting thus far as well.
p.5 #2 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
I haven't had my 100-400 long, and haven't come home with any stunners yet. Figured I'd post what I have, anyway, cause not many people have the lens yet. Those who are looking for portfolio photos, or technically-stunning images that make you want to buy the lens, look elsewhere. All I've had time to do so far is some brief shooting in the harsh mid-day sun, and in winter no less.
First is some geese on ice. Second is a 100% crop of that frame. I'm happy with how the 100-400 blurred the (very distracting) ice. Processed in Lightroom.
Third is a gull, which I had to recover a lot of shadow detail from due to the harsh sun. I'm happy with what I was able to pull from the depths of the shadows. Processed in Lightroom.
Fourth is 3:1 crop of a 15x1 pano I took last night at 400mm and f/5.6. The Capitol dome is 2.8mi away in this photo, and I'm shooting over the lake. It was cool, so I didn't have much trouble with heat. The pano and processing was done in Lightroom.
p.5 #5 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
CKrueger wrote:
I just did some testing with my 100-400 on a Z6 (not II).
* My 100-400 would let me choose "auto" and "EFCS", but not "mechanical" shutter
* My 500PF allows me to choose all three shutter options
* The 100-400 when set to auto audibly uses a full mechanical shutter from 1/8000 down to 1/320
* The 100-400 when set to auto audibly uses EFCS at 1/250 and slower
My crude sharpness test was inconclusive between my 100-400, 100-400+1.4x, and 500PF. The differences were largely in favor of the 500PF but differences minor, and I didn't fire enough frames to conclusively say one is better than another (nor would I make such a statement unless I were shooting on a tripod).
That said, "the 500PF is a little sharper" mirrors my limited real-world shooting thus far as well....Show more →
Good post and nice test shots. Question: When you were shooting just the 100-400 what VR setting were you using "Normal" or "Sport"? Check your photo shooting menu or the "i'Menu"? Just curious.
p.5 #8 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Stay tuned for more samples once I get out and about. I had literally got home, set up the Z9 menu and started the battery charging. I then unpacked the 100-400 put it on my Z7II and went out the back to our friendly Magpie and took a few photos. I came inside and post processed them and then posted them.
I've got to say, even on my Z7II, this lens is very fast to focus and it is very assertive and accurate.
p.5 #11 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Hey James, I was using Normal IS.
James Farrell wrote:
Good post and nice test shots. Question: When you were shooting just the 100-400 what VR setting were you using "Normal" or "Sport"? Check your photo shooting menu or the "i'Menu"? Just curious.
p.5 #16 · Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S images thread
Lance B wrote:
Stay tuned for more samples once I get out and about. I had literally got home, set up the Z9 menu and started the battery charging. I then unpacked the 100-400 put it on my Z7II and went out the back to our friendly Magpie and took a few photos. I came inside and post processed them and then posted them.
I've got to say, even on my Z7II, this lens is very fast to focus and it is very assertive and accurate.
This is exactly what I've observed. I think you saw the other 100-400 thread and my swan photos in poor light against a white background, it is possible to see how capable the 100-400 is on a Z6II/Z7II body. The Z lenses and cameras have been optimized for each other, and this is reflected in the speed at which focus locks on and is maintained.
Good shooting Lance... I look forward to seeing more!
