Gorgeous image. I returned my 65i for the 85DN, but it is definitely one that I would like to own again. So amazingly sharp and a goldilocks focal length between 35 and 85.
photosbyjaron wrote:
Gorgeous image. I returned my 65i for the 85DN, but it is definitely one that I would like to own again. So amazingly sharp and a goldilocks focal length between 35 and 85.
Yeah, that day I was out with 20/1.8, 35/2, 65/2, and 90/2.8.
I am also (very?) interested in the 90 2.8. Anyone who owns both, the 65 2.0 and the 90 2.8. How do they compare? Any comparison shots? I‘m not sure whether it really make sense to use both of them.
If IQ blur is same same, I think it makes more sens to pair it with 45.
Matter of focal lenght preference.
I would rather have a 2x/3x gap.
zeitlos wrote:
I am also (very?) interested in the 90 2.8. Anyone who owns both, the 65 2.0 and the 90 2.8. How do they compare? Any comparison shots? I‘m not sure whether it really make sense to use both of them.
isohw wrote:
If IQ blur is same same, I think it makes more sens to pair it with 45.
Matter of focal lenght preference.
I would rather have a 2x/3x gap.
I see, but I already have a Batis 40mm 2.0 which I like a lot. I don't shot it often, but when I do, it's my best lens (and I do have good glass... ).
I substituted my Elmarit R with this Sigma 90.
I could not be more happy.
It is almost on par with the Sigma 65.
Some aberration is corrected via software, I know, but the final results are top level.
Considering weight and dimensions this is an other Sigma “miracle”.
Owning 45, 65 and 90 I’m still in doubt on which 24 to choose.
Sigma 3.5 or 2.0? This is the question.
Anyone else find their interest in the Sigma 90mm cooled over time?
I've looked through a lot of reviews. From what I can tell, it's not great for isolating subjects - even for an f/2.8. I don't know if it's the high mechanical vignetting or something else.
).