nehemiahphoto Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #9 · p.3 #9 · Sigma I Series Image Thread (E-mount and L-mount) | |
zhangyue wrote:
Nice set. 35i is shining in your hand.
I agree with you about 35mm focal length. If you want bring it to everywhere to do most thing right, it better is consistent. It is more valuable than character. RX1’s value to me is not character for sure but consistent and versatile in a small package.
35/65/105 can be a nice set. As long as you think 65 is a long 50, 65 start making lot sense as 35 and 50 will be too close and 35/85 will miss important focal (50) between. With modern high pixel sensor, crop can be a new zoom, 65 as wider 85 isn’t too bad. 45mm is a outlier but it make perfect single lens out.
35i is really sweet being wider IMHO. I’d like to see a 20mm, and 90-135mm for the I series. With 35 and 65, it is too late for 28i as I don’t want either overlap or shuffle (buy and sell) again.
...Show more →
Thanks!!
I do like the RX1, but I also do find it a bit bland sometimes as far as character, though as you say, remarkably consistent, always pleasant--and I never have to shoot around it's weaknesses like many of my other great lenses. I rarely shoot about 75mm-ish or longer (mostly landscape with a 100mm, sometimes portraits). The longer I shoot, I just keep getting wider. I have a Contax G 21 I like, and the GM 24, so a 18-20i would be quite attractive to me. Also, fully agree on the wide 35mm. The Pentax/RX1/35i are all very near in FL, and quite nice, the Pentax being the widest and most preferable to me. The CV 35mm run a little long, so did the ZM 35 and CY 35 1.4, but I didn't test them against other options like I did the CV's.
|