newdom Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
ramesesthe2nd wrote:
Does anybody ever really, really need f/1.2?
50/1.2 GM has a unique look that no other AF 50mm lens in Sony range can quite reproduce, but 50/1.4 GM comes close enough. Sony f/1.4 GMs provide the perfect balance in weight, size, and IQ. When I go with lighter and smaller lenses, I miss the IQ. When I go with f/1.2 lenses, I feel the extra weight and bigger size.
I prefer 35mm FL to 50mm FL and don't shoot 50mm frequently enough to worry about bigger size and weight of 50/1.2 GM. If I were primarily a 50mm shooter, I would get 50/1.4 as my single lens solution.
Sigma 45mm is a good lens with broken AF. AF on that lens only works for static subjects and without AF there is no reason for me to use that lens over outstanding manual lenses from Zeiss and Voigtlander, so I ditched it (I need to sell it. It's been sitting in my dry cabinet for months).
...Show more →
Not all Sigma 45s have broken AF, it seems to depend on the copy a bit, and also on what body you're using. On recent bodies - A7iv, A7c, A7Riv, continuous AF worked perfectly well for me. Maybe not GM level of course, but good enough that it never bothered me in a variety of shooting conditions.
Does anybody ever really need f1.2? Of course not, but it's very nice if you can afford the size/weight penalty. If 35 is your bag and you haven't tried the Bigma, you really should. It's really too big to be practical as an every day lens, but for special occasions oh boy it's wonderful
|