I took some photos in Utah - Canyonlands and Arches NPs last month. Pretty damn remote places indeed. I haven't gotten around to printing them yet but I think some are nice. Gotta say that it was far more difficult to get good shots in these places than say Bryce or Grand Canyon - both in terms of accessibility (long hikes to viewpoints over uneven rocky paths) and also getting good perspectives. Was fun though...
Yes, I have been pleased with the prints I got Photo King. Everyone's gotta get a 20x30 once before they die Don't be afraid of ordering it on Super Gloss paper, it looks great!
They also print on Kodak Endura Metallic paper - I've been meaning to give it a go for a while now.
Mt Wilson is nice, but I heard that one of the nicest gardens, Lindfield Garden was sold last Autumn and has been closed since then. But anything around there is really nice
Zane Yau wrote:
The Canon 9950 seems like a good buy for A3
One of my clients has one of these. Results from A4 prints are quite good. No streaking and no dots visible in high quality mode on high quality paper.
The following are 100% crop from my 16-35 and 17-85, can you guys tell which one is which in terms of sharpness?? (look beyond the slight WB and light level differences)
Do u think both lens is suffering from focusing problems??
Both are shot maually at f/6.3 1/250 iso400, single focus point on those writings.
They aren't the same sized crop but I guess the top is the 16-35L.
Btw, I walked down to the city today and around lunch time there was a fashion show. Some sort of Vogue thing... amazingly no pros there to cover it except those with small cameras.
I can't tell the difference. My eyes aren't tuned to sharpness. They both look like they could do with a bit of USM, but that's about it as far as I can tell.
Don't be afraid of ordering it on Super Gloss paper, it looks great!