Chris_88 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #7 · What are the best A-Mount lenses to put on A7 series cameras? | |
chiron wrote:
With new LA-EA5 adapter getting good reviews in terms of autofocus precision and speed, eye-af, tracking, autoexposure, and in-camera corrections, what are the best a-mount lenses to put on an A7 series body?
I know nothing about the a-mount lenses.
As TheEmrys mentioned above, a lot of great information in that other thread. It would help, if you could provide some hints as to what type of lenses you're after.
Newer, modern FF glass (developed after Sony acquired what used to be Minolta's camera division 14 years ago) is limited to the ZA line (16-35 2.8 and 24-70 2.8 as well as four primes 24 2, 50 1.4, 85 1.4 and 135 1.8) and the G line (70-300G, 70-400G and 500 4 G). The other a-mount lenses sold under the Sony brand (such as the 16 2.8, 20 2.8, 24 2.8, 35 1.4,50 Macro, 50 1.4, 100 2.8 Macro, the 135 STF, 70-200 2.8G, the 300 2.8 G and the 500 8) as well as the TC's are all rebadged Minolta lenses which may have received updated coatings.
Unfortunately, many classic Minolta's lenses were never rebadged/updated/remade. These include the 100 2 mentioned above, the 200 2.8 APO HS, 80-200 2.8, the 2004 Macro, 300 4, 400 4.5, 600 4 or the 70-210 (aka Beercan).
I have mentioned this site in the other thread already, but Kurt Munger's review site is definitely worth a visit, even though the a-mount reviews are quite old by now. Dyxxum is another valuable source.
Some of these lenses (e.g. the Minolta 85 1.4 Ltd., the 80-200 2.8 or the 135 1.8) have a particular rendering and hence remain in demand. Despite its age, the rather compact (72mm filter thread) 200 2.8 APO HS is still capable of keeping up with modern sensors, even though the APO label is misleading.
Of course, in the cases where there is an e-mount equivalent, the newer e-mount lens is going to offer better performance, but given the state of a-mount, many of those older Sony/Minolta lenses are available at very reasonable prices (the 85 1.4 Ltd or the 200 4 Macro being among the exceptions). Edit: I see, Joshua, already mentioned the e-mount comparison, above.
|