fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2019 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III

  
 
Tony5787
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III


I’ve been searching for comparisons between these two lenses and haven’t been able to find much beyond the obvious weight difference. What I’m most interested in is the difference in autofocus speed and accuracy between the two with and without the version III teleconverters. I was wondering if anyone on here has owned or owns both and can comment from experience on how much of a difference there is. I’ve used the 2x III on the 400 DO II as well as my 600 II and I found it to be pretty great on the DO and borderline unusable for flight with the 600. I’m wondering if the difference in weight between the two lenses’ focusing groups is the reason for this or if it’s because of the significant difference in focal length.


Sep 25, 2019 at 06:37 PM
RobAmy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III


Tony I can't help with a comparison of the 2 400mm's but I do own the 400mmMk III and the DO II and owned the 600mm II. The tracking with the 2x on the 400mm Mk III blows away the DO for flight work and the 600mm II. I use mine at 800mm most of the time. It has been the best lens with extenders I have ever used, the lens at 2.8 is outstanding. The weight balance is amazing too.

Here is a recent one at 800mm. My Flickr site has tons of shots with the 400mm Mk III, I have an album for that lens too.

Landing gear down by A & R Photography, on Flickr



Sep 26, 2019 at 04:00 AM
RobAmy
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III


Lan11 wrote:
Qoute: “The tracking with the 2x on the 400mm Mk III blows away the DO for flight work and the 600mm II.”

Here’s the proof.

The 400 DO:

http://web.ncf.ca/fm568/111.jpg

… and the 400 III with its blown away effect:

http://web.ncf.ca/fm568/113.jpg

😫


No idea what your post means, are you saying you like the 400DO II better for flight with using the 2x? Fine if you do, I have a few with flight myself using the 2x extender, it is a great lens and as a bare lens or with the 1.4x it is great for BIF work. However the 400mm MkIII will eat he DO II's lunch for flight work using the 2x extender hands down.




Sep 26, 2019 at 04:42 PM
Tony5787
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III


Thanks for the sample Rob! I’m so impressed by the performance of the 400 III with the 2x, especially for tracking flight. I’m hoping CPS will have the 400 III on the evaluation list soon so I can give it a try to see for myself. It’s strange how little info/reviews there are online about the AF performance of the II with the 2x on it, wondering if that’s indicative of its performance...


Sep 26, 2019 at 06:14 PM
arbitrage
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 IS II vs IS III


RobAmy wrote:
No idea what your post means, are you saying you like the 400DO II better for flight with using the 2x? Fine if you do, I have a few with flight myself using the 2x extender, it is a great lens and as a bare lens or with the 1.4x it is great for BIF work. However the 400mm MkIII will eat he DO II's lunch for flight work using the 2x extender hands down.



Lan has an "interesting" sense of humor.....



Sep 26, 2019 at 08:58 PM





FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account