Love the set. Morris could you have gone lower and had the head in the darker green, especially in the first one? I think if you could, then the effect of the first one would have been lot more dramatic given that the water streaks would have emanated from the moving head. I can see some of the streaks but they are lost in the lighter bg.
bibek wrote:
Love the set. Morris could you have gone lower and had the head in the darker green, especially in the first one? I think if you could, then the effect of the first one would have been lot more dramatic given that the water streaks would have emanated from the moving head. I can see some of the streaks but they are lost in the lighter bg.
Interesting thought, but then that nice eye-level perspective would have been lost. But good point, anyway. I find it's always cool to have drops of water/mist/whatever in photos.
davidrhorer wrote:
Interesting thought, but then that nice eye-level perspective would have been lost. But good point, anyway. I find it's always cool to have drops of water/mist/whatever in photos.
True David. I am only talking about the first one where the long exposure is the interest creator, I feel that not being at eye level does not hurt because the eye is obscured by the blur.
bibek wrote:
True David. I am only talking about the first one where the long exposure is the interest creator, I feel that not being at eye level does not hurt because the eye is obscured by the blur.
