p.23 #1 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
Hi Karl,
The AF illuminator is on, but thanks for the suggestion.
I just don't know if this is normal behavior, that's why I turned to the forum for help.
I forgot to mention that the lens has a bit of rotational play when mounted on the camera, but it doesn't seem to induce any negative effect on the performance. At least I think this shouldn't be a problem, but having no technical experience can't be sure.
p.23 #2 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
After more testing I think the culprit for the most part are Sony A7RIV AF limitations that result in the out of focus images. Backlit definitely presents problems, but can be worked around in some scenarios. Had to look deeper through my files and my Zony 55 had similar issues to a lesser extent. To be expected I guess, it's a smaller lens with much smaller elements to move around.
Anyway, I really like the lens. Despite its huge size (and some rotational play when mounted) it stays with me.
p.23 #5 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
I love this room for testing lenses.
This is wide open and focus is on the letter t.
The pin point lights at all areas of the frame are great for mechanical vignetting and they test distortion which I've corrected this time (I usually don't) with a +6 in PS.
I didn't correct CA.
This was a real turbo Porsche when Porsche understood what a turbo was.
p.23 #6 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
Here are some urban/architectural shots for samples. They seem a little soft using the built in file upload. I assure you that they are so sharp I had to have corneal reconstruction surgery after editing these.
I like many of the film profiles in Nik Color Efx, so some of these over the next 3 posts have grain. It's artificial, the base files are quite clean and razor sharp. I'm not a pixel peeper so I edit for the overall aesthetic and not to shred eyeballs in my viewers.
Seoul, South Korea is looking a bit empty due to coronvirus concerns! Just kidding, its a 10-stop ND long exposure. It was pretty quiet that day though.
p.23 #9 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
35mm is not my thing but im still very tempted to get this lens. Amazing samples all. Keep them coming.It's incredible what Sigma managed to pull off with this lens. Nearly Otus like sharpness, great colours, contrast, bokeh and rendering on pair with Zeiss / Leica at $1500. Can't complain.
p.23 #12 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
Bob_S wrote:
All these people hiking with the bazooka that was too big to carry
It cracks me up when people get really concerned about lens size and hiking.
Jimmy Chin, in his online class, said with a completely straight face, that his typical packing list when he "really needs to go light" is a Canon 5D MkIV with the 16-35, 24-70, 70-200 f2.8 zooms.........and sometimes the 14mm f2.8. Consider that this is in additional to the technical equipment required for the actual climbing/skiing that he is going to have to do.
If that is his concept of lightweight packing, for the types of trips that he goes on, then we can all stop complaining about our lenses when we "go hiking".
You can also really dial in your other clothing and equipment to make up the weight. I have a really robust spreadsheet I use for trip planning. On the left sire are drop down items linked to a table containing everything I own and would consider buying, which auto-populates the weight and/or cost depending on if I own it or not. The blank area on the right links to the same drop down table, which allows me to compare two possible packing lists side by side with regards to cost and weight. This one was planned for 5 day ski-mountaineering trip with a hut-stop on the third day to resupply. As you can see, I can get a pretty robust camera kit and my overall pack-weight is still under 45lbs by just being somewhat disciplined in my other equipment.
p.23 #13 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
While I can agree with you that Chin's set up is manageable (as I myself am a big guy in reasonably good shape used to lugging 20kg/45lbs on my back), not everyone is the same. From physical condition, to age or simple preference not to be burdened more than needed (especially if it's going to be a prolonged trip over demanding terrain). Being an ultra-marathoner, I can assure you every bit of weight counts as time wears on.
NatDeroxL7 wrote:
It cracks me up when people get really concerned about lens size and hiking.
Jimmy Chin, in his online class, said with a completely straight face, that his typical packing list when he "really needs to go light" is a Canon 5D MkIV with the 16-35, 24-70, 70-200 f2.8 zooms.........and sometimes the 14mm f2.8. Consider that this is in additional to the technical equipment required for the actual climbing/skiing that he is going to have to do.
If that is his concept of lightweight packing, for the types of trips that he goes on, then we can all stop complaining about our lenses when we "go hiking".
You can also really dial in your other clothing and equipment to make up the weight. I have a really robust spreadsheet I use for trip planning. On the left sire are drop down items linked to a table containing everything I own and would consider buying, which auto-populates the weight and/or cost depending on if I own it or not. The blank area on the right links to the same drop down table, which allows me to compare two possible packing lists side by side with regards to cost and weight. This one was planned for 5 day ski-mountaineering trip with a hut-stop on the third day to resupply. As you can see, I can get a pretty robust camera kit and my overall pack-weight is still under 45lbs by just being somewhat disciplined in my other equipment.
p.23 #16 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
Bob_S wrote:
Yeah apparently the 35/1.2 can't be used for street photos either. It's just... too big.
All these beautiful pictures out of studio are obviously made by UFC fighters, not photographers.
Kidding aside, some really great shots, beautiful thread.
When I pre-ordered mine, it came with a free Vasa Fitness membership.
Kidding aside, I am not the best judge for lens size and weight since my favorite portrait lens is the 105mm 1.4 so the 35mm is like a baby to me lol
p.23 #17 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
Love seeing the new images. Sigma did such an amazing job with this lens. I think what I truly find unique about it other than the bokeh and rendering is the close focus ability. It can focus really close.
I took mine to death valley this last weekend and got some great shots with it. I kept wanting to shoot with it as it has such a delicious rendering wide open but i had to use some of my other wider lenses so they don't feel neglected! 😯😁 Totally my favorite 35mm. And yes as gabriel mentioned it is a baby compared to my sigma 105 1.4 which is my fav portrait lens as well 😁👍
p.23 #18 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
NatDeroxL7 wrote:
Here are some urban/architectural shots for samples. They seem a little soft using the built in file upload. I assure you that they are so sharp I had to have corneal reconstruction surgery after editing these.
I like many of the film profiles in Nik Color Efx, so some of these over the next 3 posts have grain. It's artificial, the base files are quite clean and razor sharp. I'm not a pixel peeper so I edit for the overall aesthetic and not to shred eyeballs in my viewers.
Man, those don't look soft to me at all! That second one is amazing.
p.23 #19 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
GabrielPhoto wrote:
When I pre-ordered mine, it came with a free Vasa Fitness membership.
Kidding aside, I am not the best judge for lens size and weight since my favorite portrait lens is the 105mm 1.4 so the 35mm is like a baby to me lol
p.23 #20 · Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art E Mount Lens Image Thread
stjepan wrote:
While I can agree with you that Chin's set up is manageable (as I myself am a big guy in reasonably good shape used to lugging 20kg/45lbs on my back), not everyone is the same. From physical condition, to age or simple preference not to be burdened more than needed (especially if it's going to be a prolonged trip over demanding terrain). Being an ultra-marathoner, I can assure you every bit of weight counts as time wears on.
Exactly. Not everyone is in the same physical condition. To re-state the very obvious: people come in diverse shapes, ages, sizes, strengths, careers, etc. It doesn't make sense to judge everyone by Jimmy Chin's climbing & carrying abilities. He's a *professional climber* and 46 years old.
