I bought a very well centered sample from Japan.
At infinity on Leica M10 I see a bit field curvature at f/1.4 to f/2.0,
but by f/2.8 it is pretty amazing everywhere in the frame.
And even at f/1.4 to f/2.0 it isn't really something to worry about.
BastianK wrote:
I bought a very well centered sample from Japan.
At infinity on Leica M10 I see a bit field curvature at f/1.4 to f/2.0,
but by f/2.8 it is pretty amazing everywhere in the frame.
And even at f/1.4 to f/2.0 it isn't really something to worry about.
It's a very high performance 21mm lens for sure with way less FC compared to another great 21mm lens, the Loxia 21/2.8.
At infinity distance, the CV 21/1.4 Nokton performs even better than the Leica 21/3.4 at any aperture.
Do some consider the weight an issue? For travel I find lenses > 400g a bit too hefty, but what do others feel concerning this issue?
The loxia 21mm is exactly at 400g and I wonder if others might also prefer it because of this.
(And discretely better color).
Yes. My main kit has lenses mostly around 400-450g, and I’m not sure about the Nokton 21, even though I love the 21mm focal length and Voigtlander lenses.
I might repurchase a Loxia, or make a long term play for a Leica SEM.
Knut. wrote:
Do some consider the weight an issue? For travel I find lenses > 400g a bit too hefty, but what do others feel concerning this issue?
The loxia 21mm is exactly at 400g and I wonder if others might also prefer it because of this.
(And discretely better color).
akashyap wrote:
Yes. My main kit has lenses mostly around 400-450g, and I’m not sure about the Nokton 21, even though I love the 21mm focal length and Voigtlander lenses.
I might repurchase a Loxia, or make a long term play for a Leica SEM.
Knut. wroteDo some consider the weight an issue? For travel I find lenses > 400g a bit too hefty, but what do others feel concerning this issue?
The loxia 21mm is exactly at 400g and I wonder if others might also prefer it because of this.
(And discretely better color).
What are peoples thoughts?
Knut
The Leica 21/3.4 SEM lens is really impressive in terms of its small size and image quality. However, there's something unique about using a 21mm lens at f/1.4, and the Voigtlander lens is the top choice in terms of both performance and affordability.
Loxia 21 and Nokton 21 two of my top 20 lenses. But the Nokton 21 is reliably more special. Also the focusing helicoid for some reason feels a cut better to me than the other CV, felt similar to the 35 FLE ii.
Loxia is also wonderful, great if you usually stop down with tripod.
ftllens wrote:
Loxia 21 and Nokton 21 two of my top 20 lenses. But the Nokton 21 is reliably more special. Also the focusing helicoid for some reason feels a cut better to me than the other CV, felt similar to the 35 FLE ii.
Loxia is also wonderful, great if you usually stop down with tripod.
Nokton 21mm 1.4 is also floating elements, most of the other CV lenses are not, hence a higher resistance.
I also like the Nokton as well as the Loxia, but the situations where you can actually make use of the f/1.4 aperture are scarce due to the massive vignetting from hell that lens features at f/1.4.
BastianK wrote:
I also like the Nokton as well as the Loxia, but the situations where you can actually make use of the f/1.4 aperture are scarce due to the massive vignetting from hell that lens features at f/1.4.
But the Nokton does sunstars at f/2.0, for some amazing night shots.
I’m looking for the (micro)contrast of the Loxia and the ergonomics of a Voigtlander (Loxia focusing is SO stiff!) for architecture and landscape, so I don’t think I’ll miss the 1.4. Depends on if I keep my 24 GM throughout this though.
Fred Miranda wrote: akashyap wroteYes. My main kit has lenses mostly around 400-450g, and I’m not sure about the Nokton 21, even though I love the 21mm focal length and Voigtlander lenses.
I might repurchase a Loxia, or make a long term play for a Leica SEM.
Knut. wroteDo some consider the weight an issue? For travel I find lenses > 400g a bit too hefty, but what do others feel concerning this issue?
The loxia 21mm is exactly at 400g and I wonder if others might also prefer it because of this.
(And discretely better color).
What are peoples thoughts?
KnutThe Leica 21/3.4 SEM lens is really impressive in terms of its small size and image quality. However, there's something unique about using a 21mm lens at f/1.4, and the Voigtlander lens is the top choice in terms of both performance and affordability.
I have been trying to convince myself the Leica 21/24 Lux is the better option. Not being able to get my hands on a really nice copy for somewhat reasonable price, I went the 21 Nokton route. Not sure why I waited! This lens seems to be a stunner. Only got this out in my neighborhood for a 15 minute walk but its seems like a winner. Having a 21 with such a fast aperture is pretty special to play with.
Can't wait to get this on the beach at night on the Oregon Coast.
LEICA M11 MonochromElmarit-M 1:2.8/21 lens21mmf/2.81/180s125 ISO0.0 EV
RustyRus wrote:
I have been trying to convince myself the Leica 21/24 Lux is the better option. Not being able to get my hands on a really nice copy for somewhat reasonable price, I went the 21 Nokton route. Not sure why I waited! This lens seems to be a stunner. Only got this out in my neighborhood for a 15 minute walk but its seems like a winner. Having a 21 with such a fast aperture is pretty special to play with.
Can't wait to get this on the beach at night on the Oregon Coast.
The only downside is size/weight but the Leica options have the same negative.
Didn't get as much time with this lens as I wanted to this weekend but really impressed. Thanks to @fredmiranda for such a detailed review of this lens!!!
Had a spot planned to shoot Astro on an incredible beach in Oregon but the weather didn't hold up. Next time
Depoe Bay, OR
LEICA M11Summicron-M 1:2/28 ASPH. lens28mmf/3.41/1000s64 ISO-1.0 EV
RustyRus wrote:
Didn't get as much time with this lens as I wanted to this weekend but really impressed. Thanks to @fredmiranda@ for such a detailed review of this lens!!!
Had a spot planned to shoot Astro on an incredible beach in Oregon but the weather didn't hold up. Next time
Depoe Bay, OR
Nice photo! You're welcome. I've been using the CV 21/1.4 lens since it was first available for E-mount cameras. These days, I also have the M-mount version with the 21mm viewfinder. I don't use it too often due to its larger size, but whenever I do, it brings me a lot of joy.
RustyRus wrote:
I have been trying to convince myself the Leica 21/24 Lux is the better option. Not being able to get my hands on a really nice copy for somewhat reasonable price, I went the 21 Nokton route. Not sure why I waited! This lens seems to be a stunner. Only got this out in my neighborhood for a 15 minute walk but its seems like a winner. Having a 21 with such a fast aperture is pretty special to play with.
Can't wait to get this on the beach at night on the Oregon Coast.
If based on your last post, you want to do astro with such a lens, then the Leica 21 Lux is not a good option wider than f/4 due to massive coma. I believe the 24 Lux performs similarly. That said, as an owner of the 21 Lux, I do enjoy its wide open rendering for non-technical reasons, but 70cm MFD is a bit of a restriction. I bought mine well before the VM21/1.4 was available and if shopping for such a lens now, would get the VM for its better technical performance at a much lower price.
rscheffler wrote: RustyRus wroteI have been trying to convince myself the Leica 21/24 Lux is the better option. Not being able to get my hands on a really nice copy for somewhat reasonable price, I went the 21 Nokton route. Not sure why I waited! This lens seems to be a stunner. Only got this out in my neighborhood for a 15 minute walk but its seems like a winner. Having a 21 with such a fast aperture is pretty special to play with.
Can't wait to get this on the beach at night on the Oregon Coast.If based on your last post, you want to do astro with such a lens, then the Leica 21 Lux is not a good option at and near wide open due to massive coma. I believe the 24 Lux performs similarly. That said, as an owner of the 21 Lux, I do enjoy its wide open rendering for non-technical reasons, but 70cm MFD is a bit of a restriction.
I agree with you on all fronts....Its why it was silly of me to drag my feet on pulling the trigger with this lens Especially at 800 bucks. Also its much smaller than I thought it was going to be. Easy carry when I know I want to use a 21.
I have the Nokton 21mm f/1.4 VM, and, for comparison, not the 21mm SEM, but its close cousin, the Elmar-M 24mm f/3.8 ASPH. While the Nokton is somewhat larger, and somewhat heavier, the Elmar-M is no feather-weight, being quite dense, has 46mm filter threads, so is not slim in that regard, and, its threaded hood, which flares at the front, adds considerable bulk. I do not find the Nokton 21mm VM to be an undue amount of trouble to carry, especially considering its capabilities.
To be clear, I am not complaining about these threaded Leica hoods, for the 21mm SEM, 24mm Elmar-M, and, for that matter, the Summilux-M 35 FLE. I love the ergonomics, which compensates well, in my hands, for their bulk.
I ordered my Nokton 21 VM in May of last year, along with its cousin, the Nokton 50mm f/1.0 Aspherical VM, as part of a plan to let more light into my “older” M 246 and M10 cameras, especially for evening/night shooting, rather than “upgrade” to an M10 Monochrom. (In Texas, along the hot, humid Coastal Plain, much shooting happens very early in the mornings, and in the evenings.)