httivals wrote:
So it will be roughly equivalent to an excellent 28mm f1.8 (only using the somewhat reduced center portion of the 24mm f1.4)? . . . Great, imho.
Steve Spencer wroteFred Miranda wrotehttivals wroteA 28mm lens seems less relevant now, to me at least, given the outstanding 24mm f1.4 GM and the new Sony A7RIV. A fantastic 24mm cropped to 28mm FOV from a 61MP sensor seems more than enough for me (for now, at least).With 61MP, a 24mm FL cropped to 28mm gives us 45MP. (26MP when cropped to ~35mm)
So, the FE 24/1.4 GM cropped to 28mm yields higher resolution than when using it on the A7R3!
28/24=1.166x
61/1.166/1.166=44.86MPTrue, but there will still be about half a stop worse high ISO performance at a 28mm angle of view and a little more than a stop worse high ISO performance when cropping to 35mm, which might well be something one cares about when shooting an f/1.4 lens.
Yeah, just many people may be very happy with that. Others might be a bit disappointed if they didn't realize that it won't have quite the high ISO performance of the lens and 24mm and not just a reduction in resolution.
HelBen85 wrote: sandycrane wroteWell, it seems the old Zeiss "magic" was really Cosina magic. The colors and contrast of the Voigtlander Nokton series is phenomenal!I don't think so. There was no comparison of the overall rendering in this review. On page 5 you can see complete pictures taken with both lenses, albeit in smaller sizes, and for me the colors of the Loxia look a bit better.
Of course, the last samples of Fred look great but these are great pictures, not necessarily because of the used lens.
However, I see a continuous improvement of the Voigtländer lenses. For my taste, the rendering (for landscape shots) of the 60mm f2 was good, but much worse than that of the 50mm Loxia, the 40mm f1.2 was better, but still not as good as the Loxias. I have not yet tested the 50mm f1.2, but after all I've seen here, I like the Loxia a bit better. So the Loxia stays for the time being.
I think Voigtländer is coming - to my taste - now slowly where the Loxias were a few years ago, not in terms of sharpness, but color rendering. If I would like their rendering as much as the rendering of the Loxias/Batis, I would replace my Loxias immediately, because the haptics annoy me (mounting and unmounting, scratch sensitivity, sensitivity to mechanical impacts) and last but not least I like the sunstars of the last Voigtländer lenses even better....Show more →
I'm sorry, I was referring to the older "classic" and Milvus series. Does Cosina make the Loxia and Batis?
Fred Miranda wrote: httivals wroteA 28mm lens seems less relevant now, to me at least, given the outstanding 24mm f1.4 GM and the new Sony A7RIV. A fantastic 24mm cropped to 28mm FOV from a 61MP sensor seems more than enough for me (for now, at least).With 61MP, a 24mm FL cropped to 28mm gives us 45MP. (26MP when cropped to ~35mm)
So, the FE 24/1.4 GM cropped to 28mm yields higher resolution than when using it on the A7R3!
Never a truer word, and the real win for high res sensors if they retain overall performance from lower res cameras. It assists - ironically enough, given industry directions - older lenses and in fact any lens with outer frame fall-off. For cross-frame high performers, you get greater extension.
And hi-res sensors are boosters of good lenses. A win all round. Fun fact: 61mp gets you an APS-C crop of 27mp, just below Canon's R sensor (30mp). 135mm gives you an even 200mm at 27mp. Save on lenses! And carry weight, and lens swaps.
sandycrane wrote: HelBen85 wrotesandycrane wroteWell, it seems the old Zeiss "magic" was really Cosina magic. The colors and contrast of the Voigtlander Nokton series is phenomenal!I don't think so. There was no comparison of the overall rendering in this review. On page 5 you can see complete pictures taken with both lenses, albeit in smaller sizes, and for me the colors of the Loxia look a bit better.
Of course, the last samples of Fred look great but these are great pictures, not necessarily because of the used lens.
However, I see a continuous improvement of the Voigtländer lenses. For my taste, the rendering (for landscape shots) of the 60mm f2 was good, but much worse than that of the 50mm Loxia, the 40mm f1.2 was better, but still not as good as the Loxias. I have not yet tested the 50mm f1.2, but after all I've seen here, I like the Loxia a bit better. So the Loxia stays for the time being.
I think Voigtländer is coming - to my taste - now slowly where the Loxias were a few years ago, not in terms of sharpness, but color rendering. If I would like their rendering as much as the rendering of the Loxias/Batis, I would replace my Loxias immediately, because the haptics annoy me (mounting and unmounting, scratch sensitivity, sensitivity to mechanical impacts) and last but not least I like the sunstars of the last Voigtländer lenses even better.I'm sorry, I was referring to the older "classic" and Milvus series. Does Cosina make the Loxia and Batis?
The general consensus is that they are not made by Cosina.
Not sure about Loxia. Good chance Tamron makes the Batis.
Cosina makes the Otus, Milvus, Classic, ZM, and CVs
HelBen85 wrote: sandycrane wroteI'm sorry, I was referring to the older "classic" and Milvus series. Does Cosina make the Loxia and Batis?...Maybe.. In my opinion, it doesn't matter who makes the lenses because they are totally different products / lenses.
I've been shooting Zeiss ZF lenses for over five years and the Voigt 40/1.2 for about a year and I find the family resemblance unmistakable.
DaveFP wrote: sandycrane wroteHelBen85 wrotesandycrane wroteWell, it seems the old Zeiss "magic" was really Cosina magic. The colors and contrast of the Voigtlander Nokton series is phenomenal!I don't think so. There was no comparison of the overall rendering in this review. On page 5 you can see complete pictures taken with both lenses, albeit in smaller sizes, and for me the colors of the Loxia look a bit better.
Of course, the last samples of Fred look great but these are great pictures, not necessarily because of the used lens.
However, I see a continuous improvement of the Voigtländer lenses. For my taste, the rendering (for landscape shots) of the 60mm f2 was good, but much worse than that of the 50mm Loxia, the 40mm f1.2 was better, but still not as good as the Loxias. I have not yet tested the 50mm f1.2, but after all I've seen here, I like the Loxia a bit better. So the Loxia stays for the time being.
I think Voigtländer is coming - to my taste - now slowly where the Loxias were a few years ago, not in terms of sharpness, but color rendering. If I would like their rendering as much as the rendering of the Loxias/Batis, I would replace my Loxias immediately, because the haptics annoy me (mounting and unmounting, scratch sensitivity, sensitivity to mechanical impacts) and last but not least I like the sunstars of the last Voigtländer lenses even better.I'm sorry, I was referring to the older "classic" and Milvus series. Does Cosina make the Loxia and Batis?Good chance Tamron makes the Batis.
I've seen this confirmed, but I can't find the source at the moment. And Sony has a 12% share in Tamron, so it's a mutually beneficial relationship.
GMPhotography wrote:
Mine came today. It’s actually smaller than I thought. So that’s a bonus
Soooooo this finalized my MF kit
CV 12 petals cut off by ME and my Dremel
CV 21 1.4
CV 50 1.2
Why cut the petals off the 12? And what do you use for a lens cap? (Just about to order this lens)
I have gone with the 21f3.5 as I wanted to keep it small, will keep my Loxia for a bit until I see where I go with AF primes, but I may end up with both cv21s
GMPhotography wrote:
Cut the petals off for more than one filter. I have mine set up to fit a 62mm thread right inside the hood line
Sorry for hijacking this thread, you got this set up for the Severn5 system? And have you glued an adapter in?
I found your old thread but it wasn’t clear