The comparison scene shot cracks me up. Really shows the value of the 200. Really does look like a field, not just a patch of overgrown grass/brush. Really nice shot. Just sent you a PM.
friscoron wrote:
The comparison scene shot cracks me up. Really shows the value of the 200. Really does look like a field, not just a patch of overgrown grass/brush. Really nice shot. Just sent you a PM.
Extremely captivating shot. Beautiful color toning too. I always struggle with making less than ideal locations work which makes this shot even more impressive.
Thank you so much!! It’s really hard to get locations like this to work without the 200mm for me as well!
turkeyjerky214 wrote:
Extremely captivating shot. Beautiful color toning too. I always struggle with making less than ideal locations work which makes this shot even more impressive.
Lovely image with beautiful tones and textures. The women are beautiful and the eye makeup and wardrobe adds to the juxtaposition. Could I suggest fabricating a little headroom above the models? I (overuse) the Canon 200/2 in similar situations to "falsify" an environment as you've so creatively done here.
That’s not a bad idea! I could add some space above to center it better!
John Caldwell wrote:
Lovely image with beautiful tones and textures. The women are beautiful and the eye makeup and wardrobe adds to the juxtaposition. Could I suggest fabricating a little headroom above the models? I (overuse) the Canon 200/2 in similar situations to "falsify" an environment as you've so creatively done here.
That pull back shot makes me think that more "BTS" style photos accompanying portraits like this would help people understand the value that a good photographer brings to the table.
Also I can't help but be curious what the same scene and image would've looked like with a 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 200mm and wide-open.
daggah wrote:
That pull back shot makes me think that more "BTS" style photos accompanying portraits like this would help people understand the value that a good photographer brings to the table.
Also I can't help but be curious what the same scene and image would've looked like with a 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 200mm and wide-open.
