fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              38              40              49       50       end
  

Archive 2018 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread

  
 
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #1 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Guys, will I see the difference in IQ between A7RIII and Z7 if I only use Leica R lenses
(the widest being 19mm)? I know Michael is very experienced with R lenses, what do you think?
How much practical difference is there in using Z7 with adapted lenses vs A7RIII?
EVF? LCD? Manual focussing?
I'd also shoot it with my Voight 125mm macro, any Z7 advantage for macro shooting?
I'm ready to get one of those and with Nikon everything would be new to me plus
I'd have to buy several Novoflex adapters...



Mar 07, 2019 at 04:31 AM
Steve Spencer
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #2 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
Guys, will I see the difference in IQ between A7RIII and Z7 if I only use Leica R lenses
(the widest being 19mm)? I know Michael is very experienced with R lenses, what do you think?
How much practical difference is there in using Z7 with adapted lenses vs A7RIII?
EVF? LCD? Manual focussing?
I'd also shoot it with my Voight 125mm macro, any Z7 advantage for macro shooting?
I'm ready to get one of those and with Nikon everything would be new to me plus
I'd have to buy several Novoflex adapters...


The A7r III and the Z7 are similar cameras in a lot of ways. The Z7 has a bit better low ISO IQ, and the A7r III has a bit better high ISO IQ. The A7r III has better AF, but mainly in tracking AF, which of course won't matter for adapted MF lenses. The EVFs and LCDs are similar, but the Z7's are probably a bit better (you would have to go with the new Panny S1R if you want a nice jump up in EVF). Everyone has their own preferences for manual focussing, but for me there wouldn't be a lot of difference. For R lenses, I don't think the slight difference in sensor cover glass (probably about .7mm) will make a difference.

I am considering these two cameras and have basically decided on the Z7, but mostly because I am pretty convinced I can put together a nice set of small and not too expensive M lenses for the camera. In your situation it would be a much closer call. I think I would still go with the Z7 for a couple of Nikon F lenses I am interested in (300 f/4 PF, 105 f/1.4) which interestingly work pretty well adapted to Sony, but will of course work better on the Nikon. I think a reasonable person could decide to go either way and either way you go you will have a very nice camera.



Mar 07, 2019 at 05:28 AM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #3 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Thank you Steve! I do have a set of great M lenses, but since I got my M10, I don't "adapt" them anymore
From your research, is there any difference in focus peaking? How about touch screen operations,
seems like Z7 is way more flexible? Is Z7's touch screen useful for manual focus?
Sensor is probably also a bit newer in Z7, not sure.
Any small detail might make a difference, hard to predict sometimes... Thanks!



Mar 07, 2019 at 05:42 AM
Steve Spencer
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #4 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
Thank you Steve! I do have a set of great M lenses, but since I got my M10, I don't "adapt" them anymore
From your research, is there any difference in focus peaking? How about touch screen operations,
seems like Z7 is way more flexible? Is Z7's touch screen useful for manual focus?
Sensor is probably also a bit newer in Z7, not sure.
Any small detail might make a difference, hard to predict sometimes... Thanks!


Yeah, I had an M10 and I made the same decision when I did (unfortunately mine was stolen) and stopped adapting my M lenses. I will get one again someday, but I can't really do it right now. I wish I could help you with focus peaking or the touch screen, but I don't use either of those features at all. In fact, when I get a camera I usually shut both off as one of the first things I do. Maybe I should be more open minded about them, but so far they have had zero interest to me. With regard to the sensor I wouldn't say one is newer, but rather they took the sensor that was in the A7r and D800 (which had basically the same sensor) and then Sony went one direction and Nikon (well actually Sony for Nikon) went another direction. They both both went with BSI tech and increased resolution (Nikon a little more than Sony). Sony then added the Aptina analog converter that kicks in at ISO 640 and improved the high ISO performance. Nikon, instead, made the fill wells deeper allowing a real ISO 64, which improved the low ISO performance. So I see the sensor as basically the same generation but Sony made decisions that improve high ISO more and Nikon made decisions that improved low ISO more.

With regard to small details, when handling the cameras I did like the grip of the Z7 more and unlike a lot of people I also appreciate the top LCD for shooting details, which I find handy especially when the camera is on a tripod and below my eye. I also have a slight preference for the 80% viewfinder magnification of the Nikon over the 78% for the Sony.

Good luck with your choice. You really can't go wrong with either camera.



Mar 07, 2019 at 09:38 AM
Desmolicious
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #5 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
...
I'd have to buy several Novoflex adapters...


I've found Kipon adapters to be just as nice, for about 50% less. They are much much nicer than the cheap adapters.
I bought them on ebay.



Mar 07, 2019 at 10:57 AM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #6 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Steve Spencer wrote:
...Sony made decisions that improve high ISO more and Nikon made decisions that improved low ISO more.


Thanks Steve! Looks like Nikon is more for landscape then
Hard to believe, but I've never had a Nikon camera in my hand . Time for a new challenge.



Mar 07, 2019 at 11:12 AM
Photon42
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #7 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


zhangyue wrote:
24-70f4 and 35/50f1.8S are not ugly IMO but doesn't have premium build and feeling. however, I have to say their price is very reasonable for their performance. I am very happy with the purchase so far (zoom and 50mm), I might add 35mm down to road.



I bought the Z7 with the zoom and added their new 35S, as I was missing a modern AF lens with that focal length. It is really worth its money. Great separation. Wonderful sharpness. I am sure the 50 is equally good, but I have enough 50s ...




Mar 07, 2019 at 03:34 PM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #8 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
Guys, will I see the difference in IQ between A7RIII and Z7 if I only use Leica R lenses
(the widest being 19mm)? I know Michael is very experienced with R lenses, what do you think?
How much practical difference is there in using Z7 with adapted lenses vs A7RIII?
EVF? LCD? Manual focussing?
I'd also shoot it with my Voight 125mm macro, any Z7 advantage for macro shooting?
I'm ready to get one of those and with Nikon everything would be new to me plus
I'd have to buy several Novoflex adapters...


I don’t think R glass are picky about sensor, even they do, I’s say you will expect better performance on Z than Alpha given Z has thinner top glass and R glasses were designed for film. And you said you have M10 so that you don’t care M glass on Z, big mistake, big mistake They are perform so nicely on Z, you don’t want 45M modern Nikon output for your landscape with 90APO? This is one of biggest reason I am so happy with Z. Most of my M glasses are perform very well on Z. 21SEM is not on its peak but very usable at f8~f13 compare to Sony.

And there is virtually no difference between Nikon and Sony in term of sensor performance. Sony might have better DR at high ISO and some might prefer one’s color than others but they are negligible to me. There are some reports on Z7’s banding but it really doesn’t affect my shooting till now. I just forget about it.

I never used A7RIII, so I can’t comment on many things specifically. Z7’s EVF seems slightly better from what I can read from review who handled both. However, many claims Z7 seems having slightly more delay compare to A7RIII though I don’t know the detail which mode. I can feel there is minor delay for example at silent mode, but it is way better than A7RII I had, so it was a pleasing surprise for me at the time I got Z7, of course consider I have low expectation. (I am sure Panasonic S1 with 5.6M and 120fps and faster processor, it will kill both)

LCD is very nice on Z7. I don’t know how it compare to A7rIII, but its touch screen function is very responsive and you can pretty much do anything with it if you want. I still prefer the old way with dial and wheel and I never encounter accidently get LCD touch screen going, very very nice design I’d say.

Nikon Z7 offer auto focus stacking feature. I never used myself personally on Z7 but I did a few times with D850, very neat feature with Auto focus lens. I know Z7 has enhanced more on this feature with even cooler BW showing the focus. You might want do some research yourself for Macro shooting.

Now, for adapters, I agree with others that Kipon seems offer very nice quality adapter at 1/3 of price. And you can get them from Adorama for easy return if you are not happy. Give it a try.

Now manual focusing and ergonomics, let me highlight a few things I really love about Z compare to my PAST Sony experience.

1. EVF and LCD selection during shooting. This is one of biggest feature I like about Z. on the side of EVF, there is a button you can cycle selection: LCD only, EVF only, AUTO and Viewfinder Priority. The cool thing is you can limit selection to reduce unnecessary cycle if you don’t use all. For my case, I only enable LCD only and Viewfinder Priority. Viewfinder Priority is a life saver for me, only whenever you browser menu or change setting or do image review with eye removed, it active LCD. It feels so nature to use makes you feel you are using a SLR. I was never used to any MILC or P&S camera VF&LCD setting before. The good thing about this setting is Z will go to power save mode even you hung the camera around your body. Having EVF sensor covered will not prevent camera go to sleep, as long as you keep shooting or do the menu with button, camera will be alive. And if I am on tripod, I will just hit the side button once, I am in LCD only mode, I will never worry about suddenly lose LCD feed by accidently cover the EVF. A case happen endlessly with Sony I had.

2. LCD for Manu or auto focus, you can select three option there on screen: no focus point selection no touch shutter, focus point selection, focus point selection and touch shutter. All these function is only available during LCD based shooting meaning once you are using EVF, you can’t select focus point or touch shutter on LCD. It could be good or bad depend on where are you from. I like this. I never want active both LCD for focus selection and EVF shooting. Touch shutter is a cool feature that with a light touch on screen, camera will take the shot. So it will cover most of the cases without release cable needed. BTW, you can program the shutter delay time after touch the screen.

3. ‘i’ button for bring quick menu on screen. It is icon based can be program to any feature you’d like to have. With this feature and touch screen alone make me feel it beat D850 in field for me in term of ergonomics. I can access pretty much anything I want without need to remember anything or go deep to menu. For example: silent shutter or not, IBIS on or not, File size, set effect on etc….

4. DISPLAY button is big and easy access with thumb, you can limit the cycle option as you want. I used most often is level during hand hold stitching and histogram to prevent highlight blow.

5. Three RAW option, a must feature for me. I don’t want every snap shots become 45M. Most of my daily images are Mraw or Sraw, if Panasonic S1R offer this feature, my decision of preorder which one will be a lot harder 

6. Different crop mode: I put this on one of front customer button. This is one of most used features for me during my NP visit. First of all, I prefer shooting prime lens, this offer subtle tweak perspective change during composition. And also real world situation require different format to get better iamge. You have many option to choose from such as 4X5, 16X9, DX, 1.2X etc…I also like the fact they are real crop that means your raw file size was reduced and your original image was not altered by raw program.

7. Nikon don’t have hidden trick to mess with their RAW files, means you don’t have drop bit under long exposure or Continues shooting or something like star eating or 11 bit raw etc… You don’t have to worry about either loss raw or RAW without lossless compression. Even though I have to say I still prefer D850’s raw better than Z7’s because there is still some lens profile seems cooked in RAW with Z7.

Now, some quirks for Manual focus with Z7.

1. First of all, once you zoom 100%, there is noticeable feed delay between what you see and what is in real world. I wasn’t bothered before but I have to say once I notice this, I can’t pretend it is not happening. It does affect my manual focus process under 100% zoom and it get noticeable worse with FocusByWire lens like 24-70S.

2. For sony, with any programmed button you hit for 100% view, light touch shutter, you will go back to full frame. With Nikon, you need hit “OK” button again to bring back full frame view. This is a bug to me. Quite annoy extra step in field. Though I have to say, I almost never used 100% view in manual focus EVF shooting. For manual glass shooting landscape, I use barrel with DOF scale. For AF glass, Nikon’s AF usually did better job than my manual focus actually.

This is a long post, I hope it helps you or any other have similar question regarding usage of Z.



Mar 07, 2019 at 06:41 PM
wolfloid
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #9 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


An excellent and very useful post. Let's hope Nikon fix that magnification bug in their upcoming firmware.


Mar 07, 2019 at 08:03 PM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #10 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


zhangyue wrote:
Touch shutter is a cool feature that with a light touch on screen, camera will take the shot. So it will cover most of the cases without release cable needed. BTW, you can program the shutter delay time after touch the screen.


THANK YOU!!!

Touch shutter with a delay sounds very useful to me. Very convincing.
I can see myself adjusting focus on a good LCD and using the touch shutter function -
seems more natural than reaching for the shutter button.

Yeah, the 100% bug seems fixable. Is it only when fully zoomed in? How about 50% zoom? Weird.
Of course, I know, if I have a Z7, I will put my M glass on it

Thanks again!



Mar 07, 2019 at 11:20 PM
ypamine
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #11 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
Yeah, the 100% bug seems fixable. Is it only when fully zoomed in? How about 50% zoom? Weird.


The lag in zoom mode is independent from magnification ratio. It is the same with 50% and 100% zoom.

I hope Nikon is able to solve this by firmware, but I would not bet on it. In standard viewing mode, Nikon managed to offer us a smoother viewing experience than Sony, but as soon as you switch to zoom mode, the situation is clearly reversed. With Sony, you don't see any difference, and focusing manually using the EVF in magnified mode is a pleasure. If there was a simple software solution to do the same on the Z cameras, I think Nikon would already have done it, as it is strongly impacting the user experience.




Mar 08, 2019 at 05:58 AM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #12 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
THANK YOU!!!

Touch shutter with a delay sounds very useful to me. Very convincing.
I can see myself adjusting focus on a good LCD and using the touch shutter function -
seems more natural than reaching for the shutter button.

Yeah, the 100% bug seems fixable. Is it only when fully zoomed in? How about 50% zoom? Weird.
Of course, I know, if I have a Z7, I will put my M glass on it

Thanks again!


You are welcome.

I want clarify a few things. First of all, the delay is not as bad as you would think,(I believe is in 10s of mS range from Jim Kasson's blog) and each person might feel differently how tolerable it really is. I did the test for you this morning. For 50%, I feel there might be less delay to the point I don't feel much delay actually, then I zoom to 100% again, I don't feel the delay affect much my shooting as long as I don't do very fast focusing that I usually don't do anyway once I am 100%.

I have a feeling if I don't tell you, you might not notice it

Maybe others can chime in given there is subjective tolerance.

Also, about you have to hit 'OK' again to back to full frame thing, you still can take the shot without back to full frame, just it behaves so differently than other MILC I used.
---------------------------------------------

ypamine wrote:
The lag in zoom mode is independent from magnification ratio. It is the same with 50% and 100% zoom.

I hope Nikon is able to solve this by firmware, but I would not bet on it. In standard viewing mode, Nikon managed to offer us a smoother viewing experience than Sony, but as soon as you switch to zoom mode, the situation is clearly reversed. With Sony, you don't see any difference, and focusing manually using the EVF in magnified mode is a pleasure. If there was a simple software solution to do the same on the Z cameras, I think
...Show more

Did you updated latest firmware? I think Nikon reduce this delay significantly through latest firmware.
Like I mentioned, this can be quite subjective, some might feel OK, some might get really bothered by it depend on how often or how you use it.



Mar 08, 2019 at 12:53 PM
ypamine
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #13 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


zhangyue wrote:
Did you updated latest firmware? I think Nikon reduce this delay significantly through latest firmware.
Like I mentioned, this can be quite subjective, some might feel OK, some might get really bothered by it depend on how often or how you use it.


I use the Z6 with the latest firmware, and I didn't notice any change compared to the initial firmware version.
I agree with you about the subjective character of this issue, but you can hardly ignore it when like me you mainly use manual focusing lenses. I for myself decided that this aspect was secondary versus the other qualities of the Z.



Mar 09, 2019 at 03:13 AM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #14 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


What do you guys think about the EVF? Seems like Panasonic is making a splash
with their new double resolution EVF, Kind of s@cks it's not included in the brand new Z7...
What is your strategy going forward? Are you gonna stick with the Z7 or you're tempted by the S1R?
How about the A7R IV? That should be coming pretty soon, hopefully/probably with the new EVF (?).



Mar 09, 2019 at 04:02 AM
Steve Spencer
Online
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #15 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
What do you guys think about the EVF? Seems like Panasonic is making a splash
with their new double resolution EVF, Kind of s@cks it's not included in the brand new Z7...
What is your strategy going forward? Are you gonna stick with the Z7 or you're tempted by the S1R?
How about the A7R IV? That should be coming pretty soon, hopefully/probably with the new EVF (?).


The EVF of the S1R is certainly lovely. I believe it is the same size and may well be the same EVF as in the Leica SL which has been around for a few years and people have raved about. I have wanted that EVF for a long time, but (and it for me is a very important but) not if it is going to bloat the size of the camera. The S1R weighs 345 grams more than the Z7, which for me is more than most of the lenses I plan to use weigh. So in effect I can take another lens if I want and still not have more weight with the Z7, and when I want let's say a small light 3 lens set (say Leica M 21 SEM, CVM 35 f.1,7, and Leica M 75 AA) with the Z7 that is possible and gets a kit that weighs 1,675g, but that same kit is over 2 kilos with the S1R. It doesn't feel like a light kit anymore and if I am willing to carry that much weight, I can add an ultra wide CVM 15 and still have less weight, or I can add a longer lens like the Leica M 135 f/3.4 APO and have a very similar weight. So for me the S1R just takes too much away from the small and light kit that I want. I can certainly see why other people would want it, however.
At that weight the S1R became more a competitor for me with my Fuji GFX--the S1R actually weighs more than the Fuji medium format camera. And although I am sure the S1R especially with the new Leica SL lenses would be spectacular, I am not at all sure that it would beat the Fuji with their lenses on the GFX--the Fuji is pretty spectacular too and I love it for adapted lenses including some of the M lenses. So, in my mind the Fuji is smaller, cheaper, and arguably better IQ than the S1R. I love the S1R, but because of its weight I think it is a bad match for M lenses. Why go with small lenses and then choose a big camera? If Panasonic makes a smaller camera, however (and especially if it kept the lovely EVF, which may not be possible), then I would definitely consider it.



Mar 09, 2019 at 06:50 AM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #16 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Agree 100%, S1R is way too big. To be honest I didn't realize how big the new Q2 was -
it's pretty much the same size as M10+28cron or even A7R/Z7 + Leica R 28 v2.
I'm starting to have doubts Q2 makes sense. RX1R is very small and makes a difference.
Q2 does not if I also carry my main (M10 or A7/Z7) system with me...
Steve, if the new A7R IV has that high res EVF, would you pick it over the Z7? Or you are still after
the M glass compatibility and the 21 SEM working better with Nikon?



Mar 09, 2019 at 07:36 AM
mapgraphs
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #17 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


I suspect most of us are here because we like what the Z7 has to offer.

For me, it is an excellent complement to my M. That the Z7 works better with M lenses than M lenses work on my Sony is great, I get D850 image quality with M glass - however that's just a small side benefit.

What Nikon pulls out of the sensors they design and have fabricated by Sony is probably the best available in sensor technology at the moment, DR and high ISO included.

I'm quite pleased with the direction Nikon is headed.



Mar 09, 2019 at 08:30 AM
zhangyue
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #18 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


snowboarder wrote:
What do you guys think about the EVF? Seems like Panasonic is making a splash
with their new double resolution EVF, Kind of s@cks it's not included in the brand new Z7...
What is your strategy going forward? Are you gonna stick with the Z7 or you're tempted by the S1R?
How about the A7R IV? That should be coming pretty soon, hopefully/probably with the new EVF (?).


That is size and weight and extra process power comes from. If Z7 offer similar feature with EVF and two card, Video. It might as well be big.

I preordered S1. It makes no sense to most people especially with setup as I do but you can call it personal reason. I know why I like it and why I need get it. S1/S1R was the Nikon MILC in my mind but not Z. I was surprisingly pleased by what Z offer me and even agree with Nikon's strategy about its offer. But, let's face it, other than some key features I rate in my previous post, Z is very very similar with alpha, could be treat as good or bad depend on your preference.
---------------------------------------------

Steve Spencer wrote:
The EVF of the S1R is certainly lovely. I believe it is the same size and may well be the same EVF as in the Leica SL which has been around for a few years and people have raved about. I have wanted that EVF for a long time, but (and it for me is a very important but) not if it is going to bloat the size of the camera. The S1R weighs 345 grams more than the Z7, which for me is more than most of the lenses I plan to use weigh. So in effect I
...Show more

I agree what you said, steve. It is a trade off. There will be never a perfect camera. I might find out S1's offer is not worth the extra size and weight in the end. but i know I have to find it out myself. I have a feeling this camera is my type

General speaking, I am a lot more sensitive to size than weight, though S1 sucks on both compare to Z but it actually quite a bit smaller than D850. Z7 offer better hand hold-ability than A7x as my pinky is finally on the grip, however, now-days, I put smallrig bracket on Z7 all the time for even better ergonomics at least for me. Initially, that was only for travel and tripod shooting, but later on I found I just enjoy the balance even more with it and I swear I can hold more stable with it. That means, I have to add 100~150g or so on Z7 anyway. (Sure, if I just put 50lux ASPH or 35lux pre, it make sense just removing the bracket for light package and Z offer me this option.)

Another reason for me I am less sensitive to S1's size is I usually hung the camera around my body during hiking or traveling, as long as my lenses are small enough, I can carry quite a few M glasses in a small bag. During weekend short trip, I only bring one or two glasses with me, again I am fine with the size.

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7887/40364967743_b6a9e662c0_b.jpg
---------------------------------------------

snowboarder wrote:
Agree 100%, S1R is way too big. To be honest I didn't realize how big the new Q2 was -
it's pretty much the same size as M10+28cron or even A7R/Z7 + Leica R 28 v2.
I'm starting to have doubts Q2 makes sense. RX1R is very small and makes a difference.
Q2 does not if I also carry my main (M10 or A7/Z7) system with me...
Steve, if the new A7R IV has that high res EVF, would you pick it over the Z7? Or you are still after
the M glass compatibility and the 21 SEM working better with Nikon?


I personally think Q2 will be a success, even bigger than original Q. Weather sealing and high pixel is going the right direction. but as you point out, size, size. That was the exact reason I rate RX1 above Q every single time when these two compared. RX1's size over weight any disadvantage it has for my personal need. Now, with Z7 and zoom, also 35/50S, my need for RX1 was fade so I let it go. For Q's price,(and maybe even size) you can get Z7/35/50S to have better IQ, it seems make more sense to me. However, I have to say, camera gear never need to be rationalized. Do whatever make you feel happy and enjoy using it.

As for A7RIV, if you can wait, you can always do that waiting for the next best thing. What if A9 is 36M with 16bit color, what if Z9 has the same spec as A9 with thinner sensor stack?

Think this way, as long as you are adapting lens, you are fine, you don't need lock yourself in any brand. Just pick whichever body you enjoy the best and most importantly enjoy now





Mar 09, 2019 at 02:41 PM
snowboarder
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.39 #19 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


Agree Michael with everything except the S1R which I would never get.
After your previous posts I was locked on the Z7, but checked all my stuff and I have 7 or 8 high-end
Sony-M/R/Contax adapters and it s@cks to purchase them again...
Waiting for the next best thing is stupid except I can and it looks like A7R IV is just around the corner.
There is no doubt Tokyo Olympics will force Sony to show A9II and probably A7R IV this year.
Same about Z9. So waiting might be short this time



Mar 09, 2019 at 02:56 PM
joakim
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.39 #20 · Alt forum Nikon Z resource, discussion and image thread


I hope we don't see a Z9, Z5 or any other Z camera from Nikon soon and that they rather concentrate on getting more lenses and accessories out.


Mar 10, 2019 at 08:40 AM
1       2       3              38              40              49       50       end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              38              40              49       50       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account