p.2 #1 · Hasselblad C 250 f/5.6 Superachromat on Fuji GFX
gdanmitchell wrote:
I'll take that as being as close as you'll go to a retraction and to admitting that my chart is accurate, that it doesn't differ from what I would obtain from your alternate source, and that all the other stuff you wrote was about how someone else might misinterpret my accurate data.
You could have saved a lot of words by just writing that instead of offering the distracting implication that my data were incorrect. Something like, "Your data are accurate. Those using the chart will want to consider..." (Your implications, unfortunately, presented me with a choice between leaving them unanswered or offering a lengthy "diatribe" of my own to get to the core of your misleading claims.)
I am not retracting anything. I have said my piece and I stand by it. Please respect the nature of the thread and quit making it about your chart, which as you even note is off topic.
p.2 #2 · Hasselblad C 250 f/5.6 Superachromat on Fuji GFX
Steve Spencer wrote:
With regard to the slanted horizon, I borrowed that technique from Fred as a way to make sure you get something in the corners to examine performance there.
Why, yes, obviously. I was joking about that part.
p.2 #5 · Hasselblad C 250 f/5.6 Superachromat on Fuji GFX
rfkiii wrote:
Nice link. I am wondering what practical use this information has other than for arguments in online forums.
I own the GFX and the camera Dan uses. In the beginning I used to think of GF FLs as equivalents of FF. Now, I don't.
I have found it very useful especially in terms of knowing what depth of field shots are going to have, but it does give you useful information about angle of view and a sense of how much compression a shot with a given lens will have as well.
