pjbishop Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
rdeloe wrote:
On my Epson 3880, paper unquestionably is the major expense. But that's because it costs me under $500 CAD to mix up 500ml of ink per position. This is a monochrome inkset of course. But if I used the ABW workflow and Epson inks I'd be spending considerably more. Even if I end up chucking a lot of the ink I make because I didn't print enough I'd still be ahead of the game.
Anyway, the convenience of just sticking in Epson carts is undeniable. If the OP wants to keep it simple, that's the way to go. But I like the option of being able to refill or use my own inksets (so I have a second 3880 in deep storage in case Epson's security on P800 carts is unbreachable). ...Show more →
redeloe, The full 9-cartridge inkset for P800 is $495 at B& H. At 80 ml per cartridge, that's a total of 720 ml, roughly 70 cents per. Outrageously expensive. Something to think about - I am working to support the OEM ink industry.
I agree with you about the paper. I use ImagePrint, so am able to try any number of papers. I have settled, unfortunately, on one of the more expensive papers for most types of matte prints - the Epson Ultrasmooth Fine Art. Out of curiosity, I ran a comparison print on a number of papers, including a couple of the Hahnemuhle rags. Among that limited range of papers, the Ultrasmooth was by far my preference for fineness of detail and color, as governed by the color of the paper substrate, the coating and the particular software profile. Of course, there are many other papers out there that I haven't tried, and I'm on the lookout for sample packs. I'd love find something as good but cheaper
On the reflective front, I have a large supply of the Harmon Baryta, which has been discontinued - inevitably! - by Hahnemuhle, after acquiring and continuing the brand for a while. I need to find an eventual replacement, but so far nothing I've tried matches the Harmon, and that includes the two comparable ( and more expensive ) Epson legacy papers, the original ( expensive ) Epson Baryta, and the more economical Canson, as well as some Ilford papers. Again, there are lots of papers available that I haven't tried. I ran a comparison print on six of the aforementioned papers. These are all good papers. The prints look very close, some would think identical, but for me, there is a definite difference: the Harmon renders the image best - it gives the best balance of tone and saturation, the most faithful translation from screen to paper. Again,some of the difference should be attributed to the profile. I thought it was interesting that a photographer friend of mine who used to work with 4x5 film ( and recently acquired a 5D SR ) also picked the Harman from the test array.
If you have any suggestions on paper, please suggest!
PS: Of course the cat is a scam. It is trained to escape the new owner at the earliest opportunity and return home.
|