fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2017 · Hooked on Contax now

  
 
DannyBurkPhoto
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Hooked on Contax now


Tradition, I'd say, just like Zeiss doing 25mm instead of 24mm.


Aug 22, 2017 at 07:10 PM
AdaptedLenses
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · Hooked on Contax now


Why 25mm while we're on it...


Aug 22, 2017 at 08:41 PM
DougVaughn
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · Hooked on Contax now


I tried the 25mm C/Y a while back and just couldn't fall in love with it. I have the 28/2.8, and it works very well. Also have 35/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.7, and 85/1.4. I've found the 85/1.4 to be a crazy-wonderful portrait lens.


Aug 22, 2017 at 08:59 PM
George Orwell
Offline
• •
[X]
p.2 #4 · Hooked on Contax now


jcolwell wrote:
Nope. It's probably something that happens somewhere between design inception, build, marketing, and sales. Maybe the big boss had a preference.


Good point...maybe the boss was a fan of blackjack.



Aug 23, 2017 at 03:37 AM
Dustin Gent
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Hooked on Contax now


Mathieu18 wrote:
Why 25mm while we're on it...


Well when i was looking through my LR catalogue, most of my shots taken on the 14-24 were either 14mm or 23/24mm.

i will end up with a 21mm at some point, but i think for now, a 25mm will be wide enough - especially here in the SW




Aug 30, 2017 at 11:02 AM
Jmonat7
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Hooked on Contax now


From personal experience, the 28mm f2.8 is the best lens I've ever used. It has a very cinematic color palette and rendering. The 50mm f1.4 and 1.7 are both wicked sharp lenses but I prefer the smoothness of the bokeh and much better build quality of the 1.4. The 1.7 is all plastic and does not really fit in with the typical tank-like contax zeiss build quality. The 35-70, is just phenomenal. It can do everything if you can deal with the size and push/pull ergonomics (which were never an issue for me). I have never used, but would love to get my hands on a 100mm f3.5 or 100mm f2 someday. The 100mm f2 is supposed to be incredible. Some call it the best lens that they have every used.


Sep 01, 2017 at 02:40 PM
philip_pj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #7 · Hooked on Contax now


Both 100s are truly wonderful portrait lenses, tremendous presence and character.


Sep 03, 2017 at 06:00 AM
timballic
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Hooked on Contax now


I always preferred the later iteration of the C/Y 25/2.8, the Zeiss ZF/ZE 25mm f/2.8 Distagon. My favourite24/25mm FL on Canon 5DII, but I found it front heavy on the A7.

As diglloyd points out, it doesn't perform well on test charts because of Close-up curvature of field. (But I found c/u performance to be really good)
https://diglloyd.com/articles/ZeissZ/ZeissZ-25f2_8.html

I'm surprised that the Contax 100-300 Vario-Sonnar hasn't been mentioned yet. I haven't used it myself, but it usually gets great accolades here.
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1501962

https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/926319

https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1058320/0



Sep 03, 2017 at 08:40 AM
jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #9 · Hooked on Contax now


I found the CZ 100-300 to be an excellent lens, but the results for handheld shooting just could not match what I got from my Canon L-series zooms, with IS.


Sep 03, 2017 at 10:33 AM
rico
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Hooked on Contax now


Jmonat7 wrote:
... I have never used, but would love to get my hands on a 100mm f3.5 or 100mm f2 someday. The 100mm f2 is supposed to be incredible. Some call it the best lens that they have every used.

In different ways, these are definitive CZ Contax lenses: I own both. Used S100 have been listed recently on FM B&S for under $300. The P100 is a dense hunk of glass and metal with great handling and classic rendition. It has excellent bokeh and virtually zero linear distortion—both rare for Planars. Narrow DOF wide open makes for a challenge at close range:




Sep 03, 2017 at 11:26 AM
jonboring
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #11 · Hooked on Contax now


I have the 21/2.8, 28/2, 35PC, 35-70/3.4, and the 100MP. The 100 Macro is one of the sharpest 35mm lenses ever made. And it is 1:1.


Sep 03, 2017 at 03:19 PM
Audii-Dudii
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Hooked on Contax now


I'm coming to think I may be hooked on them as well ... again! (I briefly owned a modest, two-lens RTSII outfit back in the early '80s and loved it, but had to sell it when my car needed a new cylinder head and I was caught short of funds.)

Anyway, I was out photographing this morning in downtown Phoenix from 2:30 am until 6:30 am and used exclusively the 35/f2.8. Here are some of the initial results with it mounted on my A7R / Cambo Actus combo:










Sep 03, 2017 at 04:21 PM
fferreres
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Hooked on Contax now


George Orwell wrote:
I always wondered why Carl Zeiss makes 21mm lenses as opposed to 20mm. Just to be different?


The had the first well corrected wide angle, the Biogon 2.1cm f2.8 from early 1950s. I think from them on, they stuck with 21mm. Note that Minolta also had a 21mm f4 that was and still is close to epic, and it currently the single lens that used the entire nomenclature available for Minolta Rokkor lenses. The 20mm appeared later. Also interesting to note that 21mm appears to be arbitrarily a bit more than a rounded 20mm, but that's only because we defined a cm as 1/10 of a meter, and also because we use base 10 system. There isn't anything in nature that makes a 21mm less natural than 20mm. And since they had the first fast 21mm lens (along with Angenieux) and it was already very close to the image plane, then I'd say it was the ideal trade off for the excellent performance of the lens.



Aug 26, 2019 at 09:15 PM
fferreres
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Hooked on Contax now


George Orwell wrote:
OK. Any ideas why the odd number? It just seems weird.


It's only odd in metric system. The first 21mm f2.8 for FF that I know of is the Biogon for Contax. before any lens as such was 20mm, they first hd to be either the Biogon or a copy of it.



Aug 26, 2019 at 09:17 PM
buggz
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Hooked on Contax now


I like mine, they also work with my Fuji 50R, the 35-70 to varying degrees, didn't try any in 35mm mode.
I used to have the 85/1.4, though, someone decided they needed it more than I, I still miss it...

- 35/1.4 CYZ - very slight soft vignette,
this lens is also amazing close focus on the 50R.
I see this one is going to be another rediscovered treasure gem.
Sure to be used often.

- 35-70/3.4 Macro CYZ - Starts vignetting anything lower than 50mm.
Progresses to total tunnel vision super hard at 35mm.
However in macro mode, NO vignette, amazing, also amazing close focus in macro mode.

- 100/2 CYZ - non macro model - imperceptible vignette, if any?



Aug 27, 2019 at 02:39 PM
1              end




FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account