p.14 #3Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
WhyFi wrote: Fred Miranda wroteWhyFi wroteFred Miranda wrotePerhaps going by the listing description does not tell the whole story as all the lenses I bought were listed as free of haze and separation...Yup. This, coupled with the positive feedback for the guy that repairs rear element separation, has me thinking that, if I want a 100-300, I'll buy one with with haze/separation (and priced accordingly) and get it fixed. I feel like the odds that you'll need repair work is worse than a flip of the coin anyway, so why overpay?Which guy? Any successful story?Yes -
amade1974 wroteI was asked by Robin to send the info on the place I had the CLA on my VS100-300 done. I figure there may be more people interested in this information:
When I sent him my lens, he told me there was around a 45 day waiting period. He gets lots of these lenses, as well as Leica Summiluxes and other really high end gear (he accidentally sent me a picture of some Leica 'luxes mentioning that he was working on my lens).
He charged me 150 dollars, plus around 60 dollars shipping (express shipping). The lens came back pristine, so I can only recommend his work!
p.14 #4Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
DavidBM wrote: WhyFi wroteFred Miranda wroteWhyFi wroteFred Miranda wrotePerhaps going by the listing description does not tell the whole story as all the lenses I bought were listed as free of haze and separation...Yup. This, coupled with the positive feedback for the guy that repairs rear element separation, has me thinking that, if I want a 100-300, I'll buy one with with haze/separation (and priced accordingly) and get it fixed. I feel like the odds that you'll need repair work is worse than a flip of the coin anyway, so why overpay?Which guy? Any successful story?Yes -
amade1974 wroteI was asked by Robin to send the info on the place I had the CLA on my VS100-300 done. I figure there may be more people interested in this information:
When I sent him my lens, he told me there was around a 45 day waiting period. He gets lots of these lenses, as well as Leica Summiluxes and other really high end gear (he accidentally sent me a picture of some Leica 'luxes mentioning that he was working on my lens).
He charged me 150 dollars, plus around 60 dollars shipping (express shipping). The lens came back pristine, so I can only recommend his work!Wow! Makes me a bit tempted to try a VS....
Yes, just grab the cheapest VS 100-300 from Ebay (even if haze and separation is mentioned) and send it in.
p.14 #5Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Wish I hadn’t sold my beautiful, mint copy for $500 here last summer 😩. It had just a slight haze on a small area of the rear element. I panicked and sold because I was worried that it would get worse and I’d be stuck with a lens that I couldn’t sell.
If it’s not too early to start making a wishlist for next Christmas, I’d love for Zeiss to introduce modern (Loxia?) versions of the CV 35-70, 100-300, and a new wide zoom, say, 16-28mm or so.
🙏
p.14 #7Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Fred Miranda wrote: WhyFi wroteFred Miranda wrotePerhaps going by the listing description does not tell the whole story as all the lenses I bought were listed as free of haze and separation...Yup. This, coupled with the positive feedback for the guy that repairs rear element separation, has me thinking that, if I want a 100-300, I'll buy one with with haze/separation (and priced accordingly) and get it fixed. I feel like the odds that you'll need repair work is worse than a flip of the coin anyway, so why overpay?Which guy? Any successful story?
After viewing his FB page, he does a lot more complex work to lenses than just rear element issues to the 100-300..
p.14 #8Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
mitesh wrote:
Wish I hadn’t sold my beautiful, mint copy for $500 here last summer 😩. It had just a slight haze on a small area of the rear element. I panicked and sold because I was worried that it would get worse and I’d be stuck with a lens that I couldn’t sell.
If it’s not too early to start making a wishlist for next Christmas, I’d love for Zeiss to introduce modern (Loxia?) versions of the CV 35-70, 100-300, and a new wide zoom, say, 16-28mm or so.
🙏
I’d love for Zeiss to introduce modern (Loxia?) versions of the CV 35-70, 100-300, and a new wide zoom, say, 16-28mm or so.
Zeiss are you listening, mitesh your not the only one
If you have deep pockets you could get this...... Zeiss Compact Zoom CZ.2 15-30mm T2.9
p.14 #10Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
I heard back from the place in regards to fix the haze issue on the 100-300. The particular one I was looking at has haze that affects the rear element. The guy said $150 to fix and re-cement.
When I get back from my trip, I may buy one and get it fixed. In the end, one doesn't save much money over a good one, but knowing there is someone out there talented enough to fix these is great!
p.14 #12Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
chris9 wrote:
I wonder if anybody let service a C/Y 100-300mm at Zeiss for the haze issue as Zeiss still services MM lenses. What was their reply and cost?
I made an inquiry with Zeiss about 11 months ago about servicing the CY 100-300, and this was the response I received:
p.14 #19Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Received the Leitax mount today. Pretty nifty. Have it mounted on my good copy of the VS.
Will be sending the hazed copy to Taiwan for repair in the next day or so. Should have it back in ~30-45 days.
p.14 #20Sony FE 100-400/4.5-5.6 GM vs Contax 100-300/4.5-5.6
Just an update on my "lens journey": according to the tracker, my lens has been delivered to the repair lab in Taiwan already at the end of December, but for now no news from them (notwithstanding I've asked them to send me a confirmation when they would get it).
So at least communication at the moment is a bit iffy, let's see how it pans out..