fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              55              57              73       74       end
  

Archive 2017 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II

  
 
Kolbasz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #1 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


myaeroplace wrote:
This camera will blow your mind if you're coming from a T2i. Enjoy it man!




This is reassuring, considering all the canon bashing that is happening in this thread of late.



Jul 21, 2017 at 06:56 AM
Kolbasz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #2 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Paul Mo wrote:
Or a 5D4, much better but $500 more.


I considered this, but cannot find it for the $500 more price you mention. Plus, I am a little drawn to the flippy screen and likely will not see the benefit for the added investment at this point of my photo journey (read: novice)



Jul 21, 2017 at 06:57 AM
TeamSpeed
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #3 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Kolbasz wrote:
This is reassuring, considering all the canon bashing that is happening in this thread of late.


Well, Canon does deserve it a bit. To think they were going to hype up marketing saying how much better this new sensor was based on their newest tech, only to have the public find out that DR compared to the original 6D even is a bit less. The noise qualities look better, it may be that the 6D2 has a less aggressive AA filter (allowing more detail), but if pulled darks become very noisy, removing that noise will take away that detail. This is a step back. Even putting in a 26Mpx version of the 6D sensor would have been better.

This a first time that Canon has released a new FF where the preceding APS-C has better specs, and that the new FF is a bit worse than its predecessor, in regards to missed exposure or wide DR. Don't miss your exposure (like you had to do with old off-chip ADC sensors), or don't shoot wide DR scenes where you need to bring shadows up 3 stops (which really isn't that much), and you should be fine!



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:15 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #4 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Rusty1 wrote:
Canon uses 160 real base ISO on 6D2, 6D, 5D4, 7D2 and other but not all cameras



Which is where the 80D uses the lower base ISO ...

I had hoped that they would also move the base ISO from the 6D > 6D2 lower to match that of the 80D. It would have meant a bit of a hit on the higher ISO, but that didn't happen. Again, it was a hope ... understanding that the 6D series has its prowess in areas other than shadow lifting ... not the least of which is its very broad range of usability (in a different manner than ISO invariance / shadow lifting) native to a given ISO.

While much advocacy is made regarding the shadow lifting, I see the 6D2 being a very welcome camera to those shooting wildlife, birds, sports, etc. over that of maximum DR landscape, etc. The combination of noise and detail (weaker AA filter ) provided at the higher ISO seems to be well suited for light challenged environments or where the ISO is raised for the benefit of shutter speed. The higher base ISO, while coming at the expense of the DR provides for a better IQ in the end (vs. base ISO & lift) once you move south on the available light realm in non-DR extreme scenarios.

Imagine shooting indoor sports (basketball, volleyball, etc.) or morning / dusk critters or little tykes in the house. Since you're EV level is low ... you're effectively going to wind up in the higher ISO territory whether you shoot the higher ISO natively, or try to use the lower base ISO and lift. In the end, using the native ISO yields the better IQ than the approach of base & lift.

For the dedicated DR junkie, the 6D2 is likely not the ticket for them. And while there will continue to be those who decry what Canon did NOT do, there does remain an aspect of what Canon DID do. Too early to confirm from these few samples, but it appears to me that the noise pattern is improved, the color is very nice, and the AA filter seems to be weaker (which also means slightly higher noise, i.e. 5DsR vs. 5Ds), if the same glass was used for the 5D4 and 6D2 images.

I for one would like to see what this camera does in the hands of Geoff or others for that feather detail in light challenged situations, etc. The max DR users have their obvious objections presented for the test data. I'll welcome equal time for the non-DR users in real world to find out what this camera really IS as well as isn't. It may not be the Pentax K-1 ISO invariant, but it may also be very good at what it does natively.

One thing I noticed with many of the "lifted" shadows in the test scene was the color shift that accompanied it. Shooting at native ISO seemed to avert that shift. Imo, I see a lot of real world images that are not well corrected for color casts or WB. The prospect of imparting color shift while lifting (camera dependent), means it is something that has to be corrected for. Imo, the issue of correcting for noise vs. correcting for color ... well, both are an additional correction, so it becomes a "choose your poison" kind of scenario.

In that regard, shooting the native ISO seems to yield a better overall (noise & color) IQ. Of course, we haven't determined the sweet spot or limits to be employed, but I think that when we start including the issues of AA filter detail & color fidelity to the native ISO, there is an offset afforded to the otherwise glaring difference in the DR at base ISO compared when getting to final IQ.

Still ... the test data shows the the low ISO DR to be not on par with other cameras. That is seemingly unrefutable. But, the question becomes ... what does that mean / not mean to a given user in real world application. Uber-DR shooters are going to continue to cry foul, that will never change. But, now that "Strike One" is clearly a wicked curve ball that we didn't want to see ... next pitch, please. Since we've quickly assessed what it is NOT ... now, let's see if we can find out what this puppy IS and how we CAN use it to knock it out of the park.

Surely, it's good for something.




Edited on Jul 21, 2017 at 07:37 AM · View previous versions



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:23 AM
Mikehit
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #5 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


This is an interesting article about processing Canon images as compared to other marques and suggest the 'standard' processing in DRP is somewhat detrimental to Canon images due to Canon's use of an offset

http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/canon.raw.processing1/

Part of the problems in digging out the dynamic range is due to the image editing programs. Photoshop, for example, clips data at zero. If the image editors would handle negative numbers I believe we could produce better images without fear of clipping the low end during processing.
....
Processing Canon raw data similar to the above to manage offsets shows the full dynamic range of the camera and makes results similar to Nikon images which do not have offsets to deal with. Comparison Between Nikon and Canon Raw processing[/quote



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:33 AM
Kolbasz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #6 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


TeamSpeed wrote:
Well, Canon does deserve it a bit. To think they were going to hype up marketing saying how much better this new sensor was based on their newest tech, only to have the public find out that DR compared to the original 6D even is a bit less. The noise qualities look better, it may be that the 6D2 has a less aggressive AA filter (allowing more detail), but if pulled darks become very noisy, removing that noise will take away that detail. This is a step back. Even putting in a 26Mpx version of the 6D sensor would have
...Show more

I guess this makes good sense. I know a lot was also about the lack of 4k video. This to me is a nice to have, but not a deal breaker.

I am coming from a t2i, it is broken, has been for 14 months now, so I guess from my standpoint, getting anything is going to be awesome as noted. I won't be as impacted by said short comings because in reality, I won't be missing anything.

While some of the capabilities may be worse, I guess I am paying the premium for some of the other nice to haves. Will I be happy, who knows, but with nothing but a broken old t2i to compare to, I am thinking I will be satisfied. I have been all over the board regarding the options, old 6d, 5d3 or even the 5d4 (a bit out of my price point) and the 6d2 is where I landed. all my lenses are FF so to go to the 80d or something means a complete sell and replace and that is not really something I wanted to do. While it could end up being cheaper in the end, I am also convinced that going FF will be for the positive and ultimately I will be satisfied in the end. I cannot imagine myself disappointed, but time will tell.

I am just trying to determine best place to buy, thinking b&h



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:38 AM
myaeroplace
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #7 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Kolbasz wrote:
This is reassuring, considering all the canon bashing that is happening in this thread of late.


It's all relative. The guy who was on a 6D looking for an upgrade has every right to be disappointed. This is a big divergence from Canon's history, as I don't think we've ever seen such a setback in terms of expected IQ in a modern sensor. However, we're not to conclude from this move that the 6D2 is a bad camera. It'll still take fantastic images and you won't know what to do with all the extra dynamic range you'll have if you're coming from a T2i.



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:40 AM
TeamSpeed
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #8 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


A T2i to a 6D2 will be a massive step! The only question really is whether you want to perhaps save some cash for glass or other toys and find a used 6D? It would also be a huge upgrade.

You just have to decide if the $1100 price difference is worth the flippy touch screen, 6Mpx more resolution, more AF points in the same general area as the 6D, and DPAF. The rest of the enhancements seem to be more minor.

That price difference just about pays for a 100-400II, 24-70II or an 85L, all spectacular lenses, and on a 6D, they will revolutionize your shots over the T2i and whatever you are using on them (unless you already have these lenses).

Edited on Jul 21, 2017 at 07:43 AM · View previous versions



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:41 AM
myaeroplace
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #9 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


TeamSpeed wrote:
A T2i to a 6D2 will be a massive step! The only question really is whether you want to perhaps save some cash for glass or other toys and find a used 6D? It would also be a huge upgrade.

This is a great point. If you don't have good glass, get a used 6D or 5DIII and take the extra money for a better lens.



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:42 AM
Kolbasz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #10 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Ralph Conway wrote:
Get a new 6D IQ is fantastic like (center) AF is. And both blew away 5D III. It is even cheaper purchased new, too.
If you do not know/miss the joystick and do not shoot sports, this body imo might give you anything you wish and all you need. 6D II will give you a bit more. But I would wait after christmas when it´s intro price will reach the 1.500$ level.

Conny



As much as I would love a discount at Christmas, it has been about 14 months I am without my t2i, so I am willing to pay the premium to take some pictures of the kids...



Jul 21, 2017 at 07:44 AM
TeamSpeed
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #11 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


https://shop.usa.canon.com/shop/en/catalog/eos-6d-body-refurbished - on sale, and comes with a 1 year warranty, and is $1000 cheaper than the 6D2...


Jul 21, 2017 at 07:59 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #12 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


I'm not sure if Geoff will be getting his hands on a 6D2 or not. But, I'd love to see him slap on the 100-400 II + 1.4X TC III and show us what that combination is capable of in those feathers he's shown us over time ... both great light and not so great light.


Jul 21, 2017 at 08:06 AM
Wayne M
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #13 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II




If you are out there with a xx/xxxD and ef-s 18-55 and 55-250 or something, perhaps a nifty fifty, and decide on FF the cost to switch to another brand is no barrier at all.


Nope I am well invested in good non crop glass that covers from 17mm up through 200mm plus a 1.4 TC. My 40D is dead and I want FF....I think the 6D II is where I want to be right now...though I will wait until they are actually released here in The States. If I jumped to another brand it will be because I want to try something different and will look to see how it can fit in with what I have with Canon at that time...I am certainly not going to liquidate my Canon glass.




Jul 21, 2017 at 08:38 AM
Kolbasz
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #14 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


TeamSpeed wrote:
A T2i to a 6D2 will be a massive step! The only question really is whether you want to perhaps save some cash for glass or other toys and find a used 6D? It would also be a huge upgrade.

You just have to decide if the $1100 price difference is worth the flippy touch screen, 6Mpx more resolution, more AF points in the same general area as the 6D, and DPAF. The rest of the enhancements seem to be more minor.

That price difference just about pays for a 100-400II, 24-70II or an 85L, all spectacular lenses, and on a
...Show more

As far as my current lens list, this is what I am l working with when I bring in the 6D2:

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD



Jul 21, 2017 at 09:19 AM
arbitrage
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #15 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


RustyBug wrote:
I'm not sure if Geoff will be getting his hands on a 6D2 or not. But, I'd love to see him slap on the 100-400 II + 1.4X TC III and show us what that combination is capable of in those feathers he's shown us over time ... both great light and not so great light.


Unfortunately I won't be buying a 6D2. Not because of any of the specs or DR etc. Just because I don't need another camera and already shoot with the 5D4/1DX2/D500. Honestly, the only DSLR I could see myself buying in the next 6 months is the D820 and that would be to replace D500 if it has a 8 FPS+ in crop mode so that it could replace a D500 and gain all the other FF advantages when you get close. But then again, I tried that with 5DSR vs 7D2 and in the end decided it wasn't right for me.

I think for resolving detail the 6D2 will be excellent....probably on par with the 5D4 which is very very good.



Jul 21, 2017 at 09:27 AM
lighthound
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #16 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


RustyBug wrote:
I'm not sure if Geoff will be getting his hands on a 6D2 or not. But, I'd love to see him slap on the 100-400 II + 1.4X TC III and show us what that combination is capable of in those feathers he's shown us over time ... both great light and not so great light.


+1 @ that idea. He obviously doesn't need (nor probably want) a 6DII but I'm thinking Geoff would be more than happy to take one for the team.

Kent - I take it you're seeing what I'm seeing in DPR comparison between the 6DII and 5DIV?




Jul 21, 2017 at 09:41 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #17 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


lighthound wrote:
+1 @ that idea. He obviously doesn't need (nor probably want) a 6DII but I'm thinking Geoff would be more than happy to take one for the team.

Kent - I take it you're seeing what I'm seeing in DPR comparison between the 6DII and 5DIV?



You mean Cataloochie in the morning light @ >400 ISO?



Jul 21, 2017 at 09:51 AM
arbitrage
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #18 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II




lighthound wrote:
+1 @ that idea. He obviously doesn't need (nor probably want) a 6DII but I'm thinking Geoff would be more than happy to take one for the team.

Kent - I take it you're seeing what I'm seeing in DPR comparison between the 6DII and 5DIV?



I'll be happy to evaluate your copy for a week and give my opinion😜



Jul 21, 2017 at 09:57 AM
JohnK007
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #19 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Allow me to provide some perspective between as to what can be had for under $2,000:



  1. Nikon D750 = $1,796.85
  2. Canon 6D II = $1,999.95


The most accurate description of Canon's offering might be, "Canon decided to cripple the base ISO performance of its brand new entry ... while offering nothing out of the ordinary in high ISO performance ... and to charge people more for less."



Jul 21, 2017 at 10:03 AM
JohnK007
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #20 · Official: Canon Announces the EOS 6D Mark II


Now, compared to its closest Nikon competitor, the D610:

  1. Nikon D610 = $1,496.85
  2. Canon 6D II = $1,999.95










Jul 21, 2017 at 10:10 AM
1       2       3              55              57              73       74       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              55              57              73       74       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account