p.5 #1360mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
I just inherited an AF version with 7 digit serial number that preceded the D & G versions. Are there any slight to significant optical changes the newer ones have that make them better (not talking about focusing, just sharpness) or is mine on par?
I looked through the thread but didn't see anything that would answer my curiosity.
p.5 #1460mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
old_hikingman wrote:
I just inherited an AF version with 7 digit serial number that preceded the D & G versions. Are there any slight to significant optical changes the newer ones have that make them better (not talking about focusing, just sharpness) or is mine on par?
I looked through the thread but didn't see anything that would answer my curiosity.
Dave
No difference between pre-D and D AF versions. Most of the time, D lenses only differ in the data that they transmit to the camera.
The AF-S G is a different optical formula altogether. It looks a bit more modern if you're using it at non-macro distances. More vignette, a bit better contrast, different bokeh, etc.
p.5 #1560mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
old_hikingman wrote:
I just inherited an AF version with 7 digit serial number that preceded the D & G versions. Are there any slight to significant optical changes the newer ones have that make them better (not talking about focusing, just sharpness) or is mine on par?
I looked through the thread but didn't see anything that would answer my curiosity.
Dave
Yours might be the same as the D version, just minus the (D)istance encoding electronics. Having owned the D version alongside the G version in the past, I felt the G version was better. Sharper, way faster focusing because of the built-in motor, and generally a joy to use. I eventually let go of the D version due to minimal use.
If you are into charts, you can also compare the charts of D vs G over here, confirming sharpness of the G version over most of the frame compared to the previous version(s). I think for macro though, centre sharpness is hard to tell apart between the two versions.
p.5 #1660mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
Many thanks for these responses!
After having posed the question, I did go to the "Thousand and One Nights" and saw that article and could see there were aspherical elements, etc. added to the G version. I'm lucky that I have a modern Z macro for my film copying work, so I'll have some fun getting outside with this older lens and experience its unique rendering.
p.5 #1760mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
old_hikingman wrote:
I just inherited an AF version with 7 digit serial number that preceded the D & G versions. Are there any slight to significant optical changes the newer ones have that make them better (not talking about focusing, just sharpness) or is mine on par?
I looked through the thread but didn't see anything that would answer my curiosity.
Dave
The āDā mostly matters when using TTL flash. Distance data is input into the flash equation. Enjoy your very much on-par lens!
The AF-S G lens has a different optical formula, and environmental sealing, plus, probably auto-focuses somewhat faster, so that it may be the better lens for general-purpose, all-weather photography. Some camera bodies may auto-focus the AF-S G lens more accurately. All AF-S lenses incorporate the D technology.
My wife and I have one AF-D and several AF-S G 60mm Micro-Nikkors. A small herd. I do not consider the older AF-D to be lesser, optically. When they went out of production, we accumulated spares.
p.5 #1860mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread
Put the old 60 macro on my Z8 and tried to capture the tiny water drops on a backlit tobacco flower. Didn't turn out quite as I had hoped but I still like it. It encourages me to work at it some more
Dave
NIKON Z 860mm f/2.8 lens60mmf/8.01/320s100 ISO0.0 EV
Sep 24, 2026 at 12:10 PM
kerrymattson
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.5 #1960mm f/2.8 d/g Micro - Official Image Thread