I took the 35mm f/2D to Bordeaux for a weekend. Together with the D750 it makes for a small and light package, perfect for walking around and street shooting:
I am in the market for a 35mm to be used with a D750 and this lens looks like a great candidate for my budget.
My only hesitation is the oil in the blades issue. In your experience how common is this? Since I will buy used, how to check for it? Thanks in advance for your comments.
If there is oil on the blades you will be able to see it when you stop the lens down. This lens is known for it but it can be avoided by storing the lens face down and fully stopped down. I've had mine for more than 20 yrs and had to have it cleaned twice until I learned this trick and have not had to have it cleaned since.
Had this lens for many years on my D100 - D4 (and a bunch of cameras in between). Loved it.
Gave it to one of my daughter's friends when he graduated from the police academy. Then used my 16-35 for most things.
I always liked the look and colors the 35 wide open or a bit stopped down (soft corners not a problem for me). In fact, I mostly had D lenses before I sold off a bunch to try Sony.
Thinking about buying it again to go with my 58 1.4.
I don't think I have used the 35 at all this year, forcing myself to shoot the 50 for family stuff at home lately. I'm loving the 50 Art, but the 35 f/2 still has its own kind of magic.
The Nikon 35/2D is not a lens for measurebators. It takes high quality pictures just fine. It may not be the fastest nor the best micro-contrast but it's a nice lens in it's own right.
I am absolutely in love with my D primes. I'm doing all of my professional shooting with them. I just wrote an article about them too if anyone is interested in my reasoning:
pgeorges wrote:
I am absolutely in love with my D primes. I'm doing all of my professional shooting with them. I just wrote an article about them too if anyone is interested in my reasoning:
Smousefam5 wrote: pgeorges wroteI am absolutely in love with my D primes. I'm doing all of my professional shooting with them. I just wrote an article about them too if anyone is interested in my reasoning:
pgeorges wrote:
I am absolutely in love with my D primes. I'm doing all of my professional shooting with them. I just wrote an article about them too if anyone is interested in my reasoning:
Peter, just looked at the article. It's always great to see an article not just pushing the latest tech and gear. I use a mix of Nikon D lenses and Sigma Art lenses (seems weird as they are very different beasts, but it works for me).
Not sure how extensive your use has been with other D lenses, but there are a couple of others you'd probably enjoy. I've had the 85 f/1.4d for years and it has aged well. It handles flare better than some of the other D lenses and is a bokeh machine. It is a bit close with having both the 50 & 105, so probably doesn't have a home in your bag. What would be a nice supplement to your lineup, though, is the 180 f/2.8d. This is easily one of my favorite lenses and most accurate focusing too. Better still, it can be had for cheap. I bought [stole?] my copy for just south of $300 here is very good condition. I find the 50 f/1.4 to be really good some of the time, and okay most of the time, and garbage a little of the time. Could be an issue with sample variation, or perhaps it just doesn't hold up on 36mp sensors--but I couldn't live with it. The 60 f/2.8d, though, that thing a shocking budget do-all lens. If you haven't, you should consider playing with it.
BSPhotog wrote: pgeorges wroteI am absolutely in love with my D primes. I'm doing all of my professional shooting with them. I just wrote an article about them too if anyone is interested in my reasoning:
Not sure how extensive your use has been with other D lenses, but there are a couple of others you'd probably enjoy. I've had the 85 f/1.4d for years and it has aged well. It handles flare better than some of the other D lenses and is a bokeh machine. It is a bit close with having both the 50 & 105, so probably doesn't have a home in your bag. What would be a nice supplement to your lineup, though, is the 180 f/2.8d. This is easily one of my favorite lenses and most accurate focusing too. Better still, it can be had for cheap. I bought [stole?] my copy for just south of $300 here is very good condition. I find the 50 f/1.4 to be really good some of the time, and okay most of the time, and garbage a little of the time. Could be an issue with sample variation, or perhaps it just doesn't hold up on 36mp sensors--but I couldn't live with it. The 60 f/2.8d, though, that thing a shocking budget do-all lens. If you haven't, you should consider playing with it.
I hadn't put the 35mm f/2 to use in a while, but I took it to the Iowa State Fair last week. It is still the smallest lens I own and it punches (literally) above its weight. Just the D500 and 35 f/2 all day. Here is one where I'm dragging the shutter a bit (a lot).