Numfar Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
ucphotog wrote:
Great experiment / demonstration! I love the table runner. That's something I'll have to keep in mind.
A question: Did you have to compromise on the ISO because of using the lights? Or was it a matter of getting the lights close? Among other reasons I have come to love strobes: 1) lots of light (too much sometimes) so that I can stick to base ISO and 2) and I can shoot fast, avoiding most motion blur. I'm just wondering what, if any, compromises you ended up with do to this choice of lighting.
Thanks for sharing.
(P. S. Sorry. I'm not taking my strobes back. )
Dave...Show more →
Honestly, with any half decent dSLR made in the past 3-4 years, I don't think there's much 'compromise' involve din going to ISO800 (or ISO 3200 on some of the new cameras).
Sticking to base ISO (iso35) Is something I do on medium format. Moving to 35mm, I think obsessing about noise is only really useful to landscape photographers, because they have that luxury. For everyone else, story trumps the fine grain low-level, non intrusive noise we may perceive in shots.
I mean, look at that shot above... is there noise? Yes. Is that even a bad thing, or does the modern noise character actually look fairly film-like - making the image at worst 'different', and at best, 'better' than zero-noise images? Some people steadfastly argue for the organic nature of film grain. I'm not one of them, but I do, on occasion, prefer noise in my images (sacrilegious, i know!). 
I'm not taking my strobes back either. But the skill of spoofing a professionally lit shot from $35 and items at hand is invaluable when you are out without strobes and you still have 3 minutes to nick a shot of someone a) famous, b) gorgeous, c) awesome, d)all three...
|