pdmphoto wrote:
Like I said, I don't buy the theory of decentering issue being caused by shipping companies...I've tested my lenses at 36MP with the A7R.
I don't buy it either. In that we're in agreement. The rest, well, I don't think that's worth either your time or mine to argue.
Still, until we know that the lens in question isn't a one off, I don't have plans to pounce on Zeiss. Even with great production quality, decentering in some copies (whether many or few) is still a statistical necessity.
Can you repeat the test with another camera body, just to be sure it's not the mount?
Although your Canon FD 20 seems to be better balanced between L/R, (top v/s bottom is bad btw) it would be interesting to see if a second body shows same results...
PEKA62 wrote:
Can you repeat the test with another camera body, just to be sure it's not the mount?
Although your Canon FD 20 seems to be better balanced between L/R, (top v/s bottom is bad btw) it would be interesting to see if a second body shows same results...
Maybe I can borrow the A7 from a friend after christmas. I only have an A6000 as second body at the moment.
As can be seen on this grab, rain actually brings people closed together :-) - this kind of picture is very hard to do with the classic (which has slightly better ergonomics when used on tripod, but is clearly too large to wave around with)......
I have tried to find some targets to show Loxia 21's distortion pattern close up. Which is not easy, I could not find a lot of them. Also alining the camera is hard. But here's what I managed - distance about 80cm/2.5 feet (mine)
Lens compensation is the first option in tab 7 of the cogwheel menu. It gives three correction options. For distortion, for vignette and for chromatic aberration. How the camera can correct both LoCA and LaCA at the same time I do not know, which is why I am somewhat suspicious.