(I'm hoping an in-camera multiple exposure (2, in this case) is acceptable rules-wise. Please call me on this if you think it is not and I'll pull this entry.)
CDalessandro wrote:
Very creative and well done!! Good luck!
Thank you Carolyn!
Jon
---------------------------------------------
Foggy14 wrote:
Very nice, Jon!
Thanks Foggy!
Jon
---------------------------------------------
georgetd wrote:
I quite like it, and think a multiple exposure is a completely acceptable technique.
Great shot.
Thanks George! I'm glad you approve. No pixels were harmed in the making of this image.
Jon
---------------------------------------------
pike40 wrote:
Nice work on this one Jon. Good background selection.
Mike
Thanks Mike, I'm glad you liked the background and I feel it accomplished what I wanted with the double exposure. If I had done this in Photoshop in multiple layers, I would have made the ears and mouth less noticeable so that just the eyes were poking through the ivy...but it still worked pretty well.
Very cool shot Jon! My first thought wasn't a good entry because of heavy PS work but when I read that you did this with in camera multiple exposure I thought " Damn! Jon's got himself a serious entry for this assignment."
lighthound wrote:
Very cool shot Jon! My first thought wasn't a good entry because of heavy PS work but when I read that you did this with in camera multiple exposure I thought " Damn! Jon's got himself a serious entry for this assignment."
Fantastic job and way to use that camera!
Dave
Thanks Dave. It took many tries, but I am happy with the way it came out. Not having to even open Photoshop for this made it more enjoyable (and time-saving).
I like it!
