carstenw wrote:
Yeah, somehow the Contax is too good... The imperfect film look is mostly because of the film with this camera. I sold mine, but am considering buying one back, and just shooting Adox CHS 25.
It's only black and white though right? N you have to develop it yourself if I'm not wrong.
But yes, the contax 645 system is great. I'm just trying to justify buying a digital back for it.
Nice. Do you use the 120mm macro often for landscape? I didn't use it that much because of the busy bokeh. Should give it a try as it is extremely sharp.
And please keep them coming.
I don't think bokeh would be a major concern with landscapes. I pretty much use whichever lens/focal length suits the composition. I like the 120mm quite a bit as it is very sharp and a good all around lens. I do have to keep the bokeh thing in mind when shooting shallow DOF type of shoots. I will upload some more later.
adamdewilde wrote: carstenw wroteYeah, somehow the Contax is too good... The imperfect film look is mostly because of the film with this camera. I sold mine, but am considering buying one back, and just shooting Adox CHS 25.It's only black and white though right? N you have to develop it yourself if I'm not wrong.
But yes, the contax 645 system is great. I'm just trying to justify buying a digital back for it.
Oops, it seems I never answered this. Adox/Efke CHS 25 is an art film, ISO 25, with fine grain but a very nice moderate contrast curve, a bit of an older look. There are some shots here (B&W cemetery shots):
jamgolf wrote: H.Lux wroteWow, is this the new 90mm lens? Looks fabulous.Yes. Its the new 90mm. So far I like it.
Thanks
Cool, I hope you show us more from the 90mm, it appears to be a nice lens.
pinball_pw wrote: jamgolf wroteH.Lux wroteWow, is this the new 90mm lens? Looks fabulous.Yes. Its the new 90mm. So far I like it.
ThanksCool, I hope you show us more from the 90mm, it appears to be a nice lens.