Today.. 42nd Street (from Tudor City Pl)
Otus 55mm & D5
In spring and summer every year, New Yorkers are treated to the celestial eye candy known as Manhattanhenge. The setting sun aligns with Manhattan’s city grid, creating a solar display perfectly framed by concrete buildings and steel skyscrapers. It bathes the city in its warm glow. Manhattanhenge is a two-day event that happens twice a year, first in May and then in July. This year both days in May (May 29, 30 and July 12, 13 ) were a bust thanks to cloudy skies.
Tront wrote:
Today.. 42nd Street (from Tudor City Pl)
Otus 55mm & D5
In spring and summer every year, New Yorkers are treated to the celestial eye candy known as Manhattanhenge. The setting sun aligns with Manhattan’s city grid, creating a solar display perfectly framed by concrete buildings and steel skyscrapers. It bathes the city in its warm glow. Manhattanhenge is a two-day event that happens twice a year, first in May and then in July. This year both days in May (May 29, 30 and July 12, 13 ) were a bust thanks to cloudy skies.
Wow! Inspiring, Danny! THAT is a selfie!
Let me show you mine. I am afraid, though, that my lens has odd distortions and lack of sharpness and needs to be looked at. What say you?
philber wrote:
Wow! Inspiring, Danny! THAT is a selfie!
Let me show you mine. I am afraid, though, that my lens has odd distortions and lack of sharpness and needs to be looked at. What say you?
Fantastic shot Phillipe. I am a big fan of shots of reflections of the self that demonstrate the murkiness of perceiving oneself. This shot is among the very best that I have seen demonstrating that.
CR, love your shot! I have a question: stacking is as far as I know used to get more depth of field over single-shot. So, if you are stacking, why use f:8.0, rather than a wider aperture, f:4.0 or f:5.6, where the lens is just a mite better?
philber wrote:
CR, love your shot! I have a question: stacking is as far as I know used to get more depth of field over single-shot. So, if you are stacking, why use f:8.0, rather than a wider aperture, f:4.0 or f:5.6, where the lens is just a mite better?
well the more shots i use the longer photoshop takes to render everything. plus im new to these zeiss len's and to my eye it looks sharp all the way to f16 lol.
