Scott-
The punched-up revision looks a bit unreal on my monitor.
But I really like the first two; they are colorful- yet believable, and excellent in all ways.
Charlie
Dougo wrote:
Two beautiful images Scott, to me your original first image seems to have more depth to it, and a very natural feel,IMHOO
Cheers Ray
Thank you Ray. I agree. I processed #1 to looks as close to actually being there as I could. To me it is exactly how I saw it. I did enlarge the moon slightly to compensate for the UWA lens making it look so small.
sbeme wrote:
From one Scott to another, your images are always top-notch
As are all the beautiful variations above
Is this tastefully done HDR?
Looks great
Scoot (G)
Thank you very much Scoot? Typo or on purpose?
No HDR here. I did blend in a little bit of the hot areas in the sky with another exposure and the same for a few dark areas to help reduce noise.
Jul 19, 2013 at 02:28 PM
Mark Metternich Offline • • • • • • Upload & Sell: On
Just a really well-balanced and exquisite scene. Nice work.
Second rendition works well for me (viewed on my NEC 2490WUXi2 at 6500k, 2.2 gamma; I believe most are probably not viewing on a similar display). But I like strong colors and find you need that extra bump when printing, and also when converting to jpeg. Colors always seem to be a bit more over the top on upload to this particular site (don't know if there's some default color adjustment going on or if it's just in my head).
Typo or on purpose? 