Photon Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Gunzorro wrote:
Hi Jess! Nice shots.
I can't recall if, or where, I might have mentioned that lack of identification on the TSE's, but it is consistent throughout the range of four lenses (haven't got the original 24 to check against). Yes, I'm familiar with the 1.4X showing the new focal length on my 100-400L. That's why I typed in the ID of 24+1.4X to keep the photos understandable. Small price to pay though ($200, used), for a new TSE lens, albeit a stop slower!
Thanks.
Along with that vague memory that you or someone else had mentioned the incomplete communication, I also have a vague idea that Canon lists the TS-Es among lenses compatible with their extenders. Or maybe not. If not, that would explain why they don't engineer them for extender exif reporting. Not officially supported, not optically designed for good results. And yet they work amazingly well together, IMO. Even Petkal couldn't complain about the negative effect on AF. 
|