fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Pro Digital Corner | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
  

Archive 2013 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...

  
 
cineski
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


KaBudokan, in my experience usage is mostly considered unlimited just because usage from a client perspective has become altered (mostly because so many photographers don't understand usage and don't charge for it). From my dealings and speaking with agents, many companies today simply don't want to deal with limited usage either. It's just a matter of negotiating what's fair for that unlimited usage. Sure there are companies used to this but unless you're dealing with an art buyer I wouldn't suggest getting too complicated with usage. This is especially true of smaller companies. More often than not, when I'm approached by someone similar to this situation, the second I bring up usage the second the person checks out. But then that person has a very limited budget so it wasn't going to work out in the long run anyways. There's different types of unlimited usage, though, and you really need to look at the company as to what they're really going to get out of the image. If you're taking a photo that's going to something in the entertainment industry, they're going to get a ton more milage from that image than someone in a small restaurant. But the entertainment industry is notorious for doing rights grabs just to allow access to an actor. So now I generally have 3 tiers of unlimited usage. The cheapest is for unlimited web. Next includes web and print. Next includes web, print, billboard, pretty much everything.


May 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM
paparazzinick
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


KaBudokan wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, Nick. I had been leaning toward a price per image fee, but what you're saying makes sense as well. I think charging a fair rate for both of us (based on time, valuation, etc.) and overdelivering in this case is the way to get the repeat business I'm hoping for.

Can I ask an "in general" question (which I'm starting to learn, there isn't such a thing)? Is there a typical, standard length of time to grant usage rights for, or does it just vary completely on the client's needs? If the client wants longer (or permanent!)
...Show more
HAHA there are general questions. its just that most of us are assholes and cut you up for asking them.

Usage rights vary on the client. I have a client that I let them use it forever and have at it. They also bring be a ton of business and I know they wont take advantage of me. But there are clients that I will setup a time frame or for a project. So they will get slightly different pricing.

And example and this is just fake numbers by the way. lets say I do a shoot for $10 for 2 different clients. Client 1 wants lifetime use and client 2 wants per project. Client 1 will pay $5 and client 2 will pay $2.50. See where I am going? If you do per project, make sure you put in your contract that if caught using the photos outside of the agreement then penalties will be paid.





May 15, 2013 at 12:10 PM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


paparazzinick wrote:
And example and this is just fake numbers by the way. lets say I do a shoot for $10 for 2 different clients. Client 1 wants lifetime use and client 2 wants per project. Client 1 will pay $5 and client 2 will pay $2.50. See where I am going? If you do per project, make sure you put in your contract that if caught using the photos outside of the agreement then penalties will be paid.



So in this example, your "daily rate" is $10, and then you're charging a usage fee based on the other variables? Do you bill this as such, or just change the overall "daily rate" to reflect the different usage?




May 15, 2013 at 01:35 PM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


cineski wrote:
Pap, you are exactly correct with your first sentence. This industry is being rocked to its core from this. It's also a perfect example of people sidestepping the traditional route of becoming a photographer while working for another established photographer and actually learning the industry vs people now just stating they're a photographer and not having a clue what's right or wrong and often completely undervaluing themselves.


In my time-machine world, I would go back 20 years and pick up a camera and find a photographer to assist. Seriously. As a 41-year-old guy with a 16-month old boy at home and a steady career and a mortgage, etc., I can't quite go that route at this point in my life.

Having said that, I'm trying to do my best to move forward with doing something I have discovered I love and I am good at. I really do appreciate the feedback and knowledge from those of you who have been doing this for a long time. I've also been trying to avoid causing injury to the profession - not sure how I'm doing with that, but reality checks here are helping!



May 15, 2013 at 02:12 PM
paparazzinick
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


KaBudokan wrote:
So in this example, your "daily rate" is $10, and then you're charging a usage fee based on the other variables? Do you bill this as such, or just change the overall "daily rate" to reflect the different usage?




You are correct. I bill the rate then we discuss usage later. Unless the client came to me for a specific usage for a photo upfront.



May 15, 2013 at 02:13 PM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


So - I finally got a few details, and it was an interesting conversation.

First - they're looking for 24 images. They have 12 beers they want me to shoot. For each beer, one bottle picture, and one picture with a bottle and 6-pack.

Second - when I asked about their intended usage, he said they planned to use it for everything. AND... he informed me that "because they were paying me to take the images for them, that they owned all the rights to the images." Without getting nasty about it, I disagreed, and said that according to everything I had ever read and everyone I had ever spoken to, this was not even remotely right. He mentioned "Creative Commons" and "You can thank Bush for that" and "Photographers generally haven't caught up with the new laws" and "That's the way it used to be." The only thing that I thought of that made any sense, was that maybe he was thinking of this in terms of - if a company pays an employee to take pictures, maybe the company owns the right to them? Either way - they certainly seem to want the rights to the pictures forever and ever amen.

Third - He said that the last time they had a photographer take pictures for them, he charged $17 per image. (Yes - $17!) "That's stupid low," I said. "Yes, it is," he replied, "but you're also getting experience, so take that into account." (Did I mention that I've never seen a single picture of beer -- or anything else -- on their website, other than a few snapshots of beer glasses for sale and a few snapshots of employees in the employee section? So I'm not sure where the $17 pictures are...) He also said they're "a small company and can't pay a lot for pictures."

So....

All of this seems to be heading toward them wanting cheap pictures and the rights forever. I get that. I also have a feeling that he's trying to take advantage of my inexperience because, as I mentioned, he is aware that I am new to the commercial aspect of photography. (I'm not 100% sure this is true, but...)

The one thing leading me toward lowering my initial thoughts on pricing (per image) is the fact that after the initial setup for each of the two types of images, it literally is going to be swapping out a bottle (with some slight prep) and shooting another picture. Even the majority of any post-processing will be an assembly line with the same lighting, etc. There are only two setups for the 24 images. (My initial thoughts before discussing details with him were $150 for an initial image, and $75 for each additional image with the same setup.)

Here's my current thought on the pricing: (I would still love some feedback and guidance, and as always, appreciate everyone's patience!)

Bill $200 for the initial image in each setup: $200 x 2 = $400
Bill $50 for each additional image with the same setup: $50 x 22 = $1100

This puts the total at $1500. Provide an initial first time promotional discount as discussed: -$500 (Maybe a $300 discount, which is 20% would be more appropriate.)

Total: $1000. (Or $1200 with a $300 discount.)

My estimate (possibly inaccurate) is that I'd spend in the neighborhood of 8 hours on this. $1000 as a "discounted" day rate doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Maybe I'm wrong?

If this is where I end up, should I be charging extra for usage that he assumes is their right? lol

I could go on and on, but I'll stop here for now.

Thanks for the help and for being fairly gentle!

Edited on May 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM · View previous versions



May 15, 2013 at 11:02 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #7 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Well ...

There is a "work for hire" perspective that it sounds like he is sort of expecting. In that regard, it might be appropriate to simply say here's my day rate or project quote @ XYZ.

Okay, so you've got some thinking to do. Hmmm, @ 24 delivered images. Using his $17/image (as example only), you're talking $408. If you can do the project in 8 hours, that's $51/hr, 4hrs = $102/hr, 12hrs = $34/hr. Whether you choose to look at it that way or not, he might already be.

Another thing that comes to mind here ... he is clearly striving to "devalue" you. Personally, I wouldn't sweat the usage rights issue too much because he is clearly not going of that mindset and given your lack of experience @ presenting usage rights, etc. odds aren't too good that you'll skillfully persuade him off his current position on the issue.

As to your day rate of $1,000 ... that's $125/hr ... and you're overhead is How much is your studio rent, your insurance, your staff, your backup equipment, your marketing costs, etc. He probably thinks that your overhead isn't sufficient to warrant $125/hr as the cost of doing business/cost to produce, and that for the basic catalog shots, you're artistic input isn't part of the equation, either. So, while you've kinda latched on to what he doesn't value ... the real question is to figure out what DOES he value? That doesn't mean you'll agree with it, but if you are going to contend with adjusting his present valuation, you need to know what moves that valuation up/down for him ... then play to that accordingly ... and be prepared for some objection handling.

Mind you, I'm not saying this is right or wrong ... but this is how he is likely perceiving it. I mentioned before that all valuation is relative. Understanding what it is that your prospect/client values ... that is key to valuation. Each of you has a stake in establishing relative valuation and he is trying to figure out your sense of valuation at the same time you are trying to figure out his sense of valuation, with both trying to optimize their own perspective @ valuation.

You're challenge now is to get the two of you to come to an agreement that makes sense for the two of you. Putting yourself in his shoes (not the I'm too small & cheap part) at him seeing you're "hourly rate" once the math is done may give some insight into your need to "revalue" what he is trying to "devalue". How you "add value" to your images/service ... above the next guy with a camera ... is always a challenge. For some, it is self-evident; others need a bit more help to see it.

Right now, it sounds as if he thinks he is doing you a favor. As to the whole "you getting experience" thing ... he's right ... you are getting experience in valuation and negotiation . Getting experience to shooting a bottle of beer, you can do that on your own, so his insistence that it presents "value" to you is only valuable if you allow yourself to perceive it to be. Granted, a "tear sheet" from paid work does have value, but I think he is trying to "overvalue" it to "devalue" you.

By all means, take the input from your other fellow FM members into account ... but, I'm thinking that for this one, you are going to be trying to salvage it, if you want to. I'd simply ask myself ... is it worth $50/hr for me to do this "part-time" gig, or do I need to make $75/hr or $5,000/hr to make it worth my while. Once you answer that question FOR YOURSELF as to what it is worth to your time to do the work ... then you have a baseline of how your VALUE your time (whether for him or for a different client).

Right now, it sounds like you two are on the edge of getting into a PI$$ING contest on who's right and who's not. IMO, you need to turn that around pretty quickly and restore an emotionally positive perspective to simply refocus on what it's worth to you ... submit that as your proposal ... entertain his counter proposal ... accept or attempt to re-counter with an effort to add valuation or simply say "No Thank You, I'll pass. Maybe next time. I was looking forward to working on the project with you, but it just doesn't work for me right now, but I really do appreciate the consideration and opportunity. Hopefully, we can get on the same page a bit better for the next one." (language of your choice to end it well).

BUT, in presenting your proposal, your re-counter, your acceptance or your pass, do so in a manner that is emotionally amicable ... whether that is because it just isn't worth it to you to take it on for the amount he wants it for or you've come to realize that "ya know, $75/hr for a one day, part time gig is actually kinda fair" since I've got zilch for overhead.

Trying to justify getting paid for usage rights, etc. is something that you might not be prepared to win at this point in your experience/negotiation skills, particularly with how it has proceeded to this point. So rather than put your negotiation efforts toward that which may have low chance for improving your position on, figure out what does have a better chance at improving your position for valuation ... it can be on his side, or yours ... or both.

Mind you though, I'm not suggesting that $50, $75 or $5,000 per hour is good or bad, right or wrong ... just that you have to answer that question for yourself, and then be able to persuade others to agree with you, lest you wind up agreeing with them ... or else you don't come to an agreement.

This is a setting up to be a classic "set your price" vs. "get your price" and the significance of salesmanship is rearing it's head once again.

GL ... HTH

Edited on May 16, 2013 at 11:58 AM · View previous versions



May 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM
Josh Evilsizor
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


RustyBug wrote:
Man, I can get several cases of Stag for that price !!! Who in their right mind would pay that kinda money for a beer?



I've paid that much for a single bottle



May 16, 2013 at 05:50 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #9 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Josh Evilsizor wrote:
I've paid that much for a single bottle


I've seen a can of Budweiser go for $30 a pop, a short draft for $10, while a case of San Miguel could go for under $5 (all 1980's $$$), depending on market conditions and the seller/buyer perspectives @ valuation. Did I mention that valuation is relative?



May 16, 2013 at 07:48 AM
cineski
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


And there you have it. The most important thing any photographer can do for themselves or their career is learn to say the word no. This particular business is everything that is horrible for a photographer (seeing a perceived weakness and fully exploiting it). Now the question is do you want to devalue everything about yourself? I would hope not. You can go back and quote $1000 but based on what you wrote I highly doubt they have any intentions of budging because they truly do not value photography. The issue is (and some will argue till their blue in the face with this which came first argument) the first photographer placed a very low value on what they charged, and therefore the client was taught how much photography cost and that photographers are willing to in essence pay for the shooting of a company's advertising in exchange for experience. Go back and ask them why they didn't hire the original photographer for $17/shot? I'd be very interested in hearing why.

As for work for hire, you can choose to work under this or you choose not to. The world is full of bullies (like this guy on the phone) and it's up to you to stand up to it or not.

Put in simpler terms (and this is a very valid concern that I've seen a lot of photographers get bit in the behind on): What happens if your camera goes down on a shoot you got paid $408? You're not even covering the cost of getting your gear fixed.

If this were me, I'd call them back and quote $12,000 for the job just to hear this guy's jaw hit the ground to get a chuckle. In reality, if there's no photographers who will shoot for $300/shot in your market, they'll be forced to hire someone for $300/shot.

KaBudokan wrote:
So - I finally got a few details, and it was an interesting conversation.

Did I mention this isn't a close friend?

First - they're looking for 24 images. They have 12 beers they want me to shoot. For each beer, one bottle picture, and one picture with a bottle and 6-pack.

Second - when I asked about their intended usage, he said they planned to use it for everything. AND... he informed me that "because they were paying me to take the images for them, that they owned all the rights to the images." Without getting nasty about it, I disagreed, and
...Show more



May 16, 2013 at 09:02 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #11 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


cineski wrote:
Put in simpler terms (and this is a very valid concern that I've seen a lot of photographers get bit in the behind on): What happens if your camera goes down on a shoot you got paid $408? You're not even covering the cost of getting your gear fixed.


Good point.

Or rental gear to finish the job (or your capital invested into backup gear) ... suddenly the numbers can take a radical change. You are putting your gear "at risk" every time you use it. Using lower cost gear, typically means more risk. Better gear, more $$$, less risk @ failure shoot. He doesn't need to be the one to offset all the risk in one job, but you shouldn't be "flying naked" either. Risk management is part of business. How much you've got invested into your gear for it's reliability factor (pro build vs. consumer build vs. backups) is part of that also.

I got bit by the need to have some retouching done (my first "commercial" job way back when) on a "no re-shoot" that eroded my profit margin from "kinda nice" to "man, that was a lot of work for the few bucks that remained".

Contingency is part of business. I'm quite certain that he doesn't sell his beer at his cost to produce. He has contingency/spoilage/etc. built into his pricing, as well as profit. If his customers all "demanded" that he should lower the price of his beer to what it cost someone else to produce, who hasn't factored in contingency (I can hear him now) ... he has the option of:

Changing their mind to agree with him (or partly so)
Changing his mind to agree with them (or partly so)
Telling them no (I appreciate your ever so generous offer, but I'll graciously decline at this point in time.)
Getting out of the beer business

I'd expect that he would be able to "justify" his pricing by things like the pumps & filters that he uses aren't the same as some cheap competitor, he invested in the "good ones". That his quality control is higher than theirs with a bevy of high quality gauges and controls to perpetually monitor and regulate. As a micro-brewery, he is more responsive to changes in customer tastes. His ingredients are "fresher", more organic. Yet, in a taste test ... some customers can't taste the difference between his and a competitors, but he'd still insist on justifying the valuation he has placed into his pricing ... claiming it is the "uneducated beer drinker" who doesn't understand why his product is worth as much as it is. (Starting to see a pattern @ relative here?)

If he values himself as a savvy businessman, he likely would be very willing to explain to you why he doesn't sell his product "too low", citing the real needs he has for protecting his price point. (Tap his ego.) That may be a possible "point of agreement" that can be harnessed to establish a frame of reference at why you establish your pricing however it is that you do. A tough nut to crack, and cyber-thoughts can only go so far ... since being there and getting a read on his values would be much more helpful in "real time".




May 16, 2013 at 09:22 AM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #12 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Part of the key to changing someone's mind is your ability to get inside their head. There are a few ways to go about it, and they have their "pro's & con's" as well as their variable effectiveness.

You can:

A) Try to hammer into them what you are thinking (my way or the highway, take it or leave it, uber-logic why can't you see, isn't it obvious)
B) Guess at what they're thinking (assume/strategic)
C) Ask them to unlock the door and let you go exploring (ask questions)
D) Let them open the door and "spill it" while you take notes and plant seeds (see above @ "Tap that ego" or other emotion)
E) Others

Depending on where the other person is relative to being open/closed minded ... which of the above will most effectively allow you the opportunity to change their mind is variable. Likewise, their efforts to change your mind are predicated upon much the same. Getting them to be open minded and unlock the access to their mind isn't always easy. Recognizing how they are trying to access and change your mind has merit for defending yourself from their efforts as well.

Whether you are trying to plant on fertile ground, clay or rock will determine what tools you need to plow through to where your seed will take root ... and how long it might take, or if it is worth the effort. When it is realized to no longer be worth the effort (value), that's where words like "No Thanks" and "Pass" can become more valuable for you than for them ... or maybe meeting in the middle can put more coinage in the coffer if you can only get them to "partly so" agree with you.

At the end of the day, it's either:

A) They agree with you (market transaction)
B) You agree with them (market transaction)
C) The two of you don't agree (no market transaction)

How good are you at getting to A, B or C ... and what is it worth it to you to do so?





May 16, 2013 at 11:01 AM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #13 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Just to update... We're actually a go at the $1000 rate I mentioned above. It will be billed as $1500 - $500 discount.

I'm happy with everything, except... in hindsight, I should have maybe pushed for the $1200 price. And... I don't think I handled the usage right at all - basically granting unlimited usage without additional fee. I was taken in by his assumption that they owned the images, so my thinking was that charging additional for usage would sour the deal.

Basically, I should have tried for more, but was worried about losing the gig. Now I know...

Thanks for all the help - it's definitely been a learning experience.



May 17, 2013 at 08:07 AM
Mr Joe
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Definitely get everything in writing. ASMP has contract templates if you need them. I highly recommend including that their rights to use the images are contingent upon payment.
http://asmp.org/tutorials/assignment-confirmation-form.html#.UZZUDCuglGs

Edited on May 17, 2013 at 11:03 AM · View previous versions



May 17, 2013 at 08:28 AM
cineski
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Good for you! Yes, get everything in writing including a pay schedule and the fact that image use is not granted until payment is received in full.

KaBudokan wrote:
Just to update... We're actually a go at the $1000 rate I mentioned above. It will be billed as $1500 - $500 discount.

I'm happy with everything, except... in hindsight, I should have maybe pushed for the $1200 price. And... I don't think I handled the usage right at all - basically granting unlimited usage without additional fee. I was taken in by his assumption that they owned the images, so my thinking was that charging additional for usage would sour the deal.

Basically, I should have tried for more, but was worried about losing the gig. Now I know...

Thanks for all
...Show more



May 17, 2013 at 10:01 AM
jefferies1
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #16 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


Don't feel bad about the rights. I know in some places that is easy to negotiate but in others it is best to charge a flat fee and put the money in the bank. I have to charge a flat fee or would be out of business because of the area I live in.


May 17, 2013 at 01:00 PM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #17 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


jefferies1 wrote:
Don't feel bad about the rights. I know in some places that is easy to negotiate but in others it is best to charge a flat fee and put the money in the bank. I have to charge a flat fee or would be out of business because of the area I live in.


Thanks - good to know. I don't have much of a network of pro photographers in the area to confer with, and the ones I know mainly do family shoots, portraits, etc. I'm going to try to do a little networking to see if I can get an idea of typical expectations in the area, if there is such a thing.

I'm also curious to see how my estimate is on the amount of time the shoot + editing will take. I tried to be conservative with the time I "allowed" myself, but I also know that sometimes I'll obsess over details, etc. Should be interesting.

I may also try to "overdeliver" - I have an idea or two outside of what I was tasked with that I may throw together as a bonus. As I said before, this brewery releases new limited edition and seasonal beers often - about once a month - so that's a lot of potential. My friend also manages and creates websites for several businesses - some of them rather large - so the potential exists for new business through that avenue as well. I'm planning to make a good impression.



May 17, 2013 at 01:41 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #18 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...




So, do tell ... what was your salient point(s) to swing him around off $17/image ... i.e. how you got him to agree with you more than before.



May 17, 2013 at 01:52 PM
KaBudokan
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


RustyBug wrote:


So, do tell ... what was your salient point(s) to swing him around off $17/image ... i.e. how you got him to agree with you more than before.


Well, I definitely do better in print than in person. My mouth is slower than my brain... or is my brain slower than my mouth? Either way.

I didn't do too much selling, to be honest. I was pretty straightforward. I didn't necessarily get the impression that he was expecting me to do the pictures for $17. He agreed when I said that was really low, but he also added in the "Remember, you're getting experience."

I pretty much started with:

"I think it's a good value for the quality of work and level of service that you'll receive."

And then:

"As stated before, I'll give a "promotional discount" for this initial shoot; I think a 33% discount is reasonable, which brings the total on your end down to an even (and tidy) $1000."

In hindsight, they may have gone for my proposal if I did a $300 discount instead, but at this point I'm looking at it like I didn't risk the deal and "getting in the door" over $200, and the potential for future business could be many many times more than that. I can live with that rationale.

My thinking on the pricing was to make the initial setup image a bit higher than my original thought because I could see a lot of potential one-offs in the future as a new beer is introduced, for example.

I did explain that his assertion that they owned the images was based on a "Work for Hire" situation, and that contracted work almost never falls under this category. (I read up on it - the work needs to fit into one of 9 specific categories, AND it needs to be specifically written into the contract.) Having said that, I was willing to give them the unlimited usage rights, as that seemed to be what they needed and expected. I also said I could add in a "no resale" stipulation on my end, since I wouldn't have any reason to sell the images that are specific to their brand anyway. I can still use the images for self-promotion.

That's about it. I thanked him for the opportunity, and said that I would be able to do the shoot this weekend, which was his original goal. It now turns out the bottles won't be ready until next week, so I'll do the shoot next week. I did ask (at one point a few weeks back) if they were on a deadline, and he mentioned to me today that he wants them by the end of the month. If I had known that before, I may have felt I had a little more leverage, which may be why I didn't know it before. lol



May 17, 2013 at 03:48 PM
RustyBug
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #20 · Pricing help for product photography (BEER!) - updated with more info...


KaBudokan wrote:
I didn't do too much selling, to be honest.


Oh .. but you did, even if it is way more than you realize.

You're ability to present with the conviction and the ability to provide some sound objection handling (based upon your research/homework) likely was an integral aspect in getting him to agree with you.

"Selling" isn't the "fancy pitch" that most people think it is, it is having the ability to navigate you & prospect through the course of the 5 C's (which isn't always in a straight line from start to end) to get the prospect to agree (take action) to accept your proposal of how your are going to solve his problem. It sounds like you did a nice job.

Conversation
Curiosity
Conviction (objection handling)
Create Desire
Close

His problem ... he needs/wants the pics for his website
Solution ... you'll provide the pics
Proposal ... for XYZ $$$
(oversimplified, of course)

Salesmanship is solving the prospects problem and getting the prospect to agree to your proposed method/approach/solution to do so. Negotiation (a form of objection handling) is the dance around valuation.

Again, it sounds like you've gotten quite a lot of value out of this one (in a variety of forms)... with more to follow.

Congrats on much goodness.

Edited on May 17, 2013 at 04:39 PM · View previous versions



May 17, 2013 at 04:01 PM
1              3       end




FM Forums | Pro Digital Corner | Join Upload & Sell

1              3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account